On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:31:29 -0700
Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
Would it be useful for someone with admin rights on SourceForge.net
to create a Patch Tracker? I've seen some projects with this[1].
[1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=6556atid=306556
I thought
On Sun, 29 May 2011 15:25:12 +0200, Frank wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011 14:31:29 -0700
Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
Would it be useful for someone with admin rights on SourceForge.net
to create a Patch Tracker? I've seen some projects with this[1].
[1]
Hi Hans,
I just tried to check out the plugins repository on Windows (again
after a long time) and I notice a strange problem:
The SVN checkout breaks at checking out geanypg/src/aux.c because
Windows doesn't seem to allow files and directories containing aux in
their names[1]. This is weird but
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 22:16, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 05/25/11 09:03, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 17:29, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
parsing the open source files. Dumping the list of tags parsed to a
plain-text (Ctags format) file seems
On 05/29/11 17:33, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 22:16, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
I think that would be best. Tag manager isn't really a binary format, but
there's no reason to use a format that you can't punch in on a normal
keyboard.
The tags are saved in
On 30 May 2011 10:43, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 05/29/11 17:33, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 22:16, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
I think that would be best. Tag manager isn't really a binary format,
but
there's no reason to use a format that
On 05/29/11 18:31, Lex Trotman wrote:
On 30 May 2011 10:43, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 05/29/11 17:33, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 22:16, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.cawrote:
I think that would be best. Tag manager isn't really a binary format,
but
On Tue, 17 May 2011 23:12:38 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 06:59:29 +1000, Russell wrote:
2011/5/17 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm ashamed this topic is
2011/5/30 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 23:12:38 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 06:59:29 +1000, Russell wrote:
2011/5/17 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew
I just changed the template to Arctic [1]. I like it though this is
more or less just to test it, it's not a final decision. I'd like to
get some more feedback about the template question.
Unfortunately, the author of the Arctic template won't maintain it
anymore in the future but since it
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:35, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 05/10/11 15:11, Jiří Techet wrote:
Yes, tagmanager was based on some pre- ctags 5.1 version which is more
9 years old now. I have a branch here
http://gitorious.org/~techy/geany/gproject-geany/commits/tm_cleanup2
On 05/29/11 16:55, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:35, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 05/10/11 15:11, Jiří Techet wrote:
Yes, tagmanager was based on some pre- ctags 5.1 version which is more
9 years old now. I have a branch here
On 05/29/11 15:40, Enrico Tröger wrote:
I just changed the template to Arctic [1]. I like it though this is
more or less just to test it, it's not a final decision. I'd like to
get some more feedback about the template question.
It's nicer than the default for sure.
And again, this is just
13 matches
Mail list logo
