Hi all,
we set up a wiki for additional documentation and resources related to
Geany at http://wiki.geany.org.
Anyone can contribute to the wiki simply by registering and then
logging in.
In the wiki you can find configuration snippets and tips, snippets for
various programming languages and
On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 14:52:20 +0200
Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com wrote:
it seems there wasn't any page with events in our wiki, yet. Thus, I
created one:
http://wiki.geany.org/events
It still has to be filled with events, and some of the linked events
also will have to be filled
Hey guys,
it seems there wasn't any page with events in our wiki, yet. Thus, I
created one:
http://wiki.geany.org/events
It still has to be filled with events, and some of the linked events
also will have to be filled with content, but hopefully I made a good
start with this. :)
Maybe
I think a general config section would be useful. I'll +1 this idea.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 June 2011 05:29, Jonathan Daily biomathjda...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a custom filetype for the sage [1] mathematics language,
conveniently built on
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:05:57 -0400, Jonathan wrote:
I think a general config section would be useful. I'll +1 this idea.
So, go ahead! :)
Regards,
Enrico
--
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgpC7Ko1t9PGY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:16:37 +1000, Lex wrote:
Using firefox 3.6.17.
Tried with Midori (GIT master), some Chromium version from Debian
Testing and Firefox 4.0.
I couldn't reproduce it but that doesn't mean much.
Not happening for me at the moment either, maybe its some thing to do
with
BTW I put the images in a howto:images: namespace rather than directly
in howto.
Ok.
I didn't think about how to handle images yet. Maybe a dedicated image
namespace is useful or a image namespace per major namespace?
Not sure yet.
Well I would suggest images split up to be near where they
On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 23:19:03 +1000, Lex wrote:
BTW I put the images in a howto:images: namespace rather than
directly in howto.
Ok.
I didn't think about how to handle images yet. Maybe a dedicated
image namespace is useful or a image namespace per major namespace?
Not sure yet.
Well I would
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 13:07:08 +1000, Lex wrote:
Enrico and all,
Is anyone else having trouble with preview when editing pages?
Sometimes (and I can't determine when) when asking for a preview the
sidebar overwrites the edit window and disables the save button. So I
have had to do recent changes
Am 03.06.2011 03:37, schrieb Lex Trotman:
/rant I feel better now. :-)
/me hopes you'll never read CSS he wrote...
Sadly I already did, but I gave him the benefit of the doubt that it
might be program generated and the server squashed whitespace.
In which case I also think vector is
Please dont't. I don't want to have every page looks different. If you
really want to have fixed size, you can use e.g. a firefox plugin to
have some local css for a namespace.
Its not me who is reading it, why do you want to make the wiki harder
for users to read unless they have some
Am 03.06.2011 09:38, schrieb Lex Trotman:
Please dont't. I don't want to have every page looks different. If you
really want to have fixed size, you can use e.g. a firefox plugin to
have some local css for a namespace.
Its not me who is reading it, why do you want to make the wiki harder
From a design view it would make sense to limit it for every page, but
done on a global css level. Using a little number of different templates
might would also make sense. BUT: I'd like to avoid individual styles on
each page as user's expectations will be some common look and feel on
whole
Am 03.06.2011 10:56, schrieb Lex Trotman:
I will also try to get the images in the build document this weekend,
You could also send the to me via direct mail and I can do the upload if
needed.
Cheers,
Frank
___
Geany mailing list
Geany@uvena.de
On 3 June 2011 19:27, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Am 03.06.2011 10:56, schrieb Lex Trotman:
I will also try to get the images in the build document this weekend,
You could also send the to me via direct mail and I can do the upload if
needed.
The problem is getting time when I
://tiwtr.uvena.de/wiki/playground
I installed the wrap plugin anyway (in the Geany wiki). If you want,
play around with it, even at the risk Frank will hate us :).
Seriously, we could at least try what's possible and then decide
whether we want this or not.
In general, I share Frank's opinion
Done so.
But it looks weird, 40em is too few I'd say:
https://tiwtr.uvena.de/wiki/playground
Yes, the 40em seems to include the sidebar, so it would need to be wider.
I installed the wrap plugin anyway (in the Geany wiki). If you want,
play around with it, even at the risk Frank
On 06/03/11 00:38, Lex Trotman wrote:
Please dont't. I don't want to have every page looks different. If you
really want to have fixed size, you can use e.g. a firefox plugin to
have some local css for a namespace.
+1
Its not me who is reading it, why do you want to make the wiki harder
Hey guys,
today I put a little love into the new wiki to get it a step further.
Changes:
- I put some basic guidelines together, just what came to my mind [1]
- installed the nspages plugin to generate dynamic index pages for
namespaces, I used it for testing on the Snippets page [2] - I like
Naw, it's bad enough having some pages not take up the full available screen
space let alone all of them. Wasn't it you in the A new look thread who
was quite strongly against wasting your resolution by using a fixed width?
IMHO, having one page not fill the available screen space is weird.
On 4 June 2011 05:29, Jonathan Daily biomathjda...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a custom filetype for the sage [1] mathematics language,
conveniently built on python, that I was hoping to put into the wiki.
Would this be something that should go into the wiki, and if so,
where?
Hi Jonathan,
That
Enrico and all,
Is anyone else having trouble with preview when editing pages?
Sometimes (and I can't determine when) when asking for a preview the
sidebar overwrites the edit window and disables the save button. So I
have had to do recent changes by saving and seeing what it looks like
(sorry
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:42:28 +1000, Lex wrote:
For a direct comparism, I pasted your text into another wiki to see
how it looks with the Vector template:
https://tiwtr.uvena.de/wiki/playground
Now you've done it!!
On my monitor the lines are on average 30 words wide, way too much,
way hard
/rant I feel better now. :-)
/me hopes you'll never read CSS he wrote...
Sadly I already did, but I gave him the benefit of the doubt that it
might be program generated and the server squashed whitespace.
In which case I also think vector is ok.
Ok, so I switched back to the Vector
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:56:20 +1000, Lex wrote:
Did you find any template that limits the max-width?
The only one I found and which looks okish is:
http://www.dokuwiki.org/template:doogie
It's currently running on our wiki. It feels more like a blog layout
than a wiki but maybe this is jjust
2011/6/1 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:56:20 +1000, Lex wrote:
Did you find any template that limits the max-width?
The only one I found and which looks okish is:
http://www.dokuwiki.org/template:doogie
It's currently running on our wiki. It feels more like a
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:36:21 +1000, Russell wrote:
2011/6/1 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:56:20 +1000, Lex wrote:
Did you find any template that limits the max-width?
The only one I found and which looks okish is:
http://www.dokuwiki.org/template:doogie
It's
On Tue, 31 May 2011 12:48:40 +1000, Lex wrote:
I guess if they were just tags, then just using regular tags related
to the topic would be good, but since there's some arbitrary link
between tags and the page navigation (haven't figured it out yet),
maybe it needs to be consistent?
IIUC
On Tue, 31 May 2011 23:42:58 +0200, Enrico wrote:
One addition:
Between these two I much prefer the Vector template's layout because:
(1) I think it looks cleaner and more professional;
(2) useful links such as Printable version and the Search input box
are clearly visible. The Doogie template
2011/6/1 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 23:42:58 +0200, Enrico wrote:
One addition:
Between these two I much prefer the Vector template's layout because:
(1) I think it looks cleaner and more professional;
(2) useful links such as Printable version and the Search
Am 30.05.2011 00:40, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 23:12:38 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 06:59:29 +1000, Russell wrote:
2011/5/17 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew
I guess if they were just tags, then just using regular tags related to the
topic would be good, but since there's some arbitrary link between tags and
the page navigation (haven't figured it out yet), maybe it needs to be
consistent?
IIUC (which may not be the case :-) the navigation stuff
One thing that I did notice with the WIki is that playground seems to
be readonly, even if logged in ??
Cheers
Lex
___
Geany mailing list
Geany@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
On Tue, 17 May 2011 23:12:38 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 06:59:29 +1000, Russell wrote:
2011/5/17 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm ashamed this topic is
2011/5/30 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 23:12:38 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 06:59:29 +1000, Russell wrote:
2011/5/17 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew
I just changed the template to Arctic [1]. I like it though this is
more or less just to test it, it's not a final decision. I'd like to
get some more feedback about the template question.
Unfortunately, the author of the Arctic template won't maintain it
anymore in the future but since it
On 05/29/11 15:40, Enrico Tröger wrote:
I just changed the template to Arctic [1]. I like it though this is
more or less just to test it, it's not a final decision. I'd like to
get some more feedback about the template question.
It's nicer than the default for sure.
And again, this is just
Am 27.05.2011 09:54, schrieb Lex Trotman:
I'm not sure how that would work with file templates, since the 'real'
filename is unknown at the time it's created, unless I misunderstand. Maybe
better would be to make a litte Add-on plugin: 'Insert Header' or similar.
IIRC the proposal was to
Am 25.05.2011 23:54, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Hi,
I can't seem to find the upload form that the Docuwiki documentation
talks about[1]. I would like to insert an image (screenshot) into a
page I just created.
I guess maybe the Wiki isn't configured properly to allow this? Or am I
missing
On 05/25/11 23:52, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 25.05.2011 23:54, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Hi,
I can't seem to find the upload form that the Docuwiki documentation
talks about[1]. I would like to insert an image (screenshot) into a
page I just created.
I guess maybe the Wiki isn't configured
Am 26.05.2011 08:53, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 05/25/11 23:52, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 25.05.2011 23:54, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Hi,
I can't seem to find the upload form that the Docuwiki documentation
talks about[1]. I would like to insert an image (screenshot) into a
page I just created.
On 05/26/11 00:10, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 08:53, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 05/25/11 23:52, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 25.05.2011 23:54, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Hi,
I can't seem to find the upload form that the Docuwiki documentation
talks about[1]. I would like to insert an image
Am 26.05.2011 10:22, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 05/26/11 00:10, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 08:53, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 05/25/11 23:52, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 25.05.2011 23:54, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Hi,
I can't seem to find the upload form that the Docuwiki documentation
talks
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:40:51 +0200, Frank wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 10:22, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 05/26/11 00:10, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 08:53, schrieb Matthew Brush:
On 05/25/11 23:52, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 25.05.2011 23:54, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Hi,
I can't seem to find the
On 05/26/11 13:41, Enrico Tröger wrote:
Not sure what I thought when setting up the groups, I changed it so
that also user members can everything, including upload and delete.
So, Matthew could you please try again?
Yep, it works[1]! Thank you.
And please note my apologies.
No worries.
Le 27/05/2011 01:54, Matthew Brush a écrit :
On 05/26/11 13:41, Enrico Tröger wrote:
Not sure what I thought when setting up the groups, I changed it so
that also user members can everything, including upload and delete.
So, Matthew could you please try again?
Yep, it works[1]! Thank
Just for 5 minutes of Python fun, the guard generation would be better
with something like this:
'H_' + ''.join([c if c in 'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789' else
'_' for c in '{filename}'.upper().rstrip('.H')])
advantages:
* handles any character in the filename (most importantly
Hi,
I can't seem to find the upload form that the Docuwiki documentation
talks about[1]. I would like to insert an image (screenshot) into a
page I just created.
I guess maybe the Wiki isn't configured properly to allow this? Or am I
missing something?
[1]
On Wed, 18 May 2011 09:34:46 +1000, Ross wrote:
Yay!
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
I'm not yet sure about the overall structure of the contents in the
wiki, this we still need to work out. But you can of course create a
page with content already if you like.
If a basic
2011/5/19 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 09:34:46 +1000, Ross wrote:
Yay!
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
I'm not yet sure about the overall structure of the contents in the
wiki, this we still need to work out. But you can of course create a
page
Am 17.05.2011 00:04, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:51:44 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm ashamed this topic is already so old and nothing happened so far
because I
Am 16.05.2011 23:51, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
If you know any cool plugins we could use or have any ideas, please
share them.
I'd like to have a plugin to tag pages as e.g.
http://www.dokuwiki.org/plugin:tag is one to.
Cheers,
Frank
___
Geany mailing
Le 16/05/2011 23:51, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm ashamed this topic is already so old and nothing happened so far
because I didn't manage to set up the Wiki yet.
I'll set up the
I have never contributed to a wiki before, but I would love to do so.
I use geany for R statistics on both windows and linux and have done
some things to integrate geany, R, and console2 (windows terminal
emulator) on windows. What is the proper procedure for material/guide
submission?
Thanks and
I wrote an AutoHotKey script to pass text from the geany window to
either an active Rterm or the active tab of console2. I also wrote an
R script to dump functions into a space separated text file to
facilitate text highlighting for packages that I use all the time. And
finally, I wrote some
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:34:47 -0400, Jonathan wrote:
I wrote an AutoHotKey script to pass text from the geany window to
either an active Rterm or the active tab of console2. I also wrote an
R script to dump functions into a space separated text file to
facilitate text highlighting for packages
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:41:32 +0200, Frank wrote:
Am 16.05.2011 23:51, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
If you know any cool plugins we could use or have any ideas, please
share them.
I'd like to have a plugin to tag pages as e.g.
http://www.dokuwiki.org/plugin:tag is one to.
Installed.
Regards,
In case it helps anyone, look at http://caladbolg.net/textadeptwiki/
for an example of content that might be useful to contain in the Geany
wiki. This link is to the Textadept wiki, where Textadept is another
excellent cross-platform text editor but with a different design and
different goasl to Geany
On Mon, 16 May 2011 18:08:46 -0700, Matthew wrote:
On 05/16/11 15:04, Enrico Tröger wrote:
Currently, registration is disabled.
I think we should go for open registration coupled with a captcha.
I changed it a bit:
everyone can register but has limited access until the registration
is
2011/5/17 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm ashamed this topic is already so old and nothing happened so far
because I didn't manage to set up the Wiki yet.
I'll set up the
On Wed, 18 May 2011 06:59:29 +1000, Russell wrote:
2011/5/17 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm ashamed this topic is already so old and nothing happened so far
because I
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:34:47 -0400
Jonathan Daily biomathjda...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote an AutoHotKey script to pass text from the geany window to
either an active Rterm or the active tab of console2. I also wrote an
R script to dump functions into a space separated text file to
facilitate
On Tue, 17 May 2011 22:43:30 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:41:32 +0200, Frank wrote:
Am 16.05.2011 23:51, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
If you know any cool plugins we could use or have any ideas, please
share them.
I'd like to have a plugin to tag
On Tue, 17 May 2011 23:23:04 +0200, Frank wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 22:43:30 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:41:32 +0200, Frank wrote:
Am 16.05.2011 23:51, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
If you know any cool plugins we could use or have any ideas,
in the Geany
wiki. This link is to the Textadept wiki, where Textadept is another
excellent cross-platform text editor but with a different design and
different goasl to Geany.
Looks like a good base to work from.
--
Ross McKay, Toronto, NSW Australia
Before enlightenment: chop wood, carry water
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm ashamed this topic is already so old and nothing happened so far
because I didn't manage to set up the Wiki yet.
I'll set up the Wiki next week or at least next weekend,
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:51:44 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Sun, 8 May 2011 18:41:32 +0200, Enrico wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm ashamed this topic is already so old and nothing happened so far
because I didn't manage to set up the Wiki yet.
I'll set up the
On 05/16/11 15:04, Enrico Tröger wrote:
Currently, registration is disabled.
I think we should go for open registration coupled with a captcha.
I changed it a bit:
everyone can register but has limited access until the registration is
approved. I still think we could use a captcha for the
Am 08.05.2011 18:41, schrieb Enrico Tröger:
I'm ashamed this topic is already so old and nothing happened so far
because I didn't manage to set up the Wiki yet.
I'll set up the Wiki next week or at least next weekend, hopefully.
Thanks for your patience.
Looking forward to ;)
Cheers,
Frank
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:59:08 -0700, Matthew wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm ashamed this topic is already so old and nothing happened so far
because I didn't manage to set up the Wiki yet.
I'll set up the Wiki next week or at least next weekend, hopefully.
Thanks for your patience.
Regards,
Enrico
--
On 04/03/11 05:56, Enrico Tröger wrote:
To enforce the decision a bit, are there any objections in using
DokuWiki for wiki.geany.org with the MarkDown and/or reStructuredText
plugins?
None here.
Cheers,
Matthew Brush
___
Geany mailing list
Am Sonntag, den 03.04.2011, 14:56 +0200 schrieb Enrico Tröger:
To enforce the decision a bit, are there any objections in using
DokuWiki for wiki.geany.org with the MarkDown and/or reStructuredText
plugins?
Go ahead and don't hesitate that long. :)
--
Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com
Le 03/04/2011 15:29, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:02:07 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 03/04/2011 14:56, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:20:06 +0200, Frank wrote:
[...]
To enforce the decision a bit, are there any objections in using
DokuWiki for wiki.geany.org
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 15:29:33 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:02:07 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 03/04/2011 14:56, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:20:06 +0200, Frank wrote:
[...]
To enforce the decision a bit, are there any objections
Le 03/04/2011 16:39, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 15:29:33 +0200
Enrico Trögerenrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 15:02:07 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 03/04/2011 14:56, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:20:06 +0200, Frank wrote:
[...]
To enforce the
On 04/03/11 17:10, Lex Trotman wrote:
Through away the rst stuff and use DokuWiki syntax. Simple, fast and
consistent solution for the wiki.
Yeah, if it's not a problem for some users not to use the same thing than
Geany use for it's own doc (why Wiki user would even know? :D) I think it's
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:40:30 +1000, Russell wrote:
On 1 April 2011 11:07, Randy Kramer rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 31 March 2011 01:43:52 pm Enrico Tröger wrote:
The question about the Wiki software to use is still unanswered if I
didn't miss anything.
I personally still would
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:55:49 -0700
Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
It could also serve as a sort of
scratchpad to work on the newsletter (or ideas for the newsletter,
topics wishlist, etc) before the issues are released.
I had the chance to do this within some other project during
On 1 April 2011 11:07, Randy Kramer rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 31 March 2011 01:43:52 pm Enrico Tröger wrote:
The question about the Wiki software to use is still unanswered if I
didn't miss anything.
I personally still would prefer DokuWiki or PMWiki.
Any opinions?
Of course!
I haven't used neither of the mentioned wikis, but here are some interesting
links that you might take a look at.
http://www.wikimatrix.org/compare/DokuWiki+PmWiki
http://www.abcseo.com/blog/dokuwiki-vs-pmwiki
http://www.wikimatrix.org/forum/t539-dokuwiki-pmwiki
Cheers :)
Le 31/03/2011 19:43, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
[...]
Do you think this is something that could/should be hosted on the
Geany website using MediaWiki, MoinMoin or similar software, or do you
think it would be better to use a third party hosting like
live.gnome.org or a similar service?
as
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:35:10 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 31/03/2011 19:43, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
[...]
Do you think this is something that could/should be hosted on the
Geany website using MediaWiki, MoinMoin or similar software, or do
you think it would be better to use a third party
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:43:07 +0200
Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:35:10 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 31/03/2011 19:43, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
[...]
Do you think this is something that could/should be hosted on the
Geany website using MediaWiki,
On Thursday 31 March 2011 01:43:52 pm Enrico Tröger wrote:
The question about the Wiki software to use is still unanswered if I
didn't miss anything.
I personally still would prefer DokuWiki or PMWiki.
Any opinions?
Of course! ;-)
I'd recommend choosing a wiki which uses a markup language
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:51:40 +0100
Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 15.03.2011, 16:36 +0100 schrieb Michael Spahn:
I would offer the hosting and maintenance.
We could use a sub domain like wiki.geany.org, f.e.
I guess hosting is not that issue, actually. There
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:48:14 +1100
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 March 2011 10:42, Russell Dickenson
russelldicken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 March 2011 09:35, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 March 2011 10:29, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 03/15/11
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:20:59 +0100, Frank wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:51:40 +0100
Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 15.03.2011, 16:36 +0100 schrieb Michael Spahn:
I would offer the hosting and maintenance.
We could use a sub domain like wiki.geany.org, f.e.
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:36:27 +0100, Michael wrote:
I would offer the hosting and maintenance.
We could use a sub domain like wiki.geany.org, f.e.
Don't worry about the hosting, I think it should stay with the rest of
the Geany services.
I'll setup wiki.geany.org as soon as we clarified the
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:02:20 +0100, Frank wrote:
Am 15.03.2011 16:36, schrieb Michael Spahn:
I would offer the hosting and maintenance.
We could use a sub domain like wiki.geany.org, f.e.
I'd like that idea. What do you thinking of using here? MoinMoin,
docuwiki, Mediawiki? I'd would also
On 03/16/11 12:18, Enrico Tröger wrote:
Regarding the wiki software, basically I don't mind which wiki.
Though I have some technical preferences about the software.
I'd prefer to have a PHP based solution as it would nicely integrate
into the existing Lighttpd+FastCGI setup, from my personal
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:46:32 -0700, Matthew wrote:
On 03/16/11 12:18, Enrico Tröger wrote:
Regarding the wiki software, basically I don't mind which wiki.
Though I have some technical preferences about the software.
I'd prefer to have a PHP based solution as it would nicely integrate
into
This website might help you find the best wiki platform for your needs:
http://www.wikimatrix.org/wizard.php
Or you can view some opinions on SO:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/541675/whats-the-best-open-source-wiki-platform
If there's need for UI/functionality changes on the wiki, i can
Matthew Brush wrote:
MediaWiki is probably the most standard Wiki software (ie. Wikipedia and
friends) and it's written in PHP. It also supports ReST as noted in
this thread. I've never heard of DocuWiki though, it looks interesting
too. I haven't looked at PMWiki yet.
There's a few geany
On 15 March 2011 13:59, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
Does Geany have a wiki somewhere which users and developers can edit with
tutorials, examples, links, screenshots and so on? I looked around a bit
and I couldn't find one. I notice that the main website is a Wiki, but it
Am 15.03.2011 04:59, schrieb Matthew Brush:
Does Geany have a wiki somewhere which users and developers can edit
with tutorials, examples, links, screenshots and so on? I looked around
a bit and I couldn't find one. I notice that the main website is a
Wiki, but it doesn't seem to be editable
Dnia wtorek, 15 marca 2011 o 10:21:35 Frank Lanitz napisał(a):
moment. I hardly recommend to keep it like this as these are the
'official' pages.
strongly recommend
___
Geany mailing list
Geany@uvena.de
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 10:45:51 am Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 15.03.2011 13:01, schrieb Křištof Želechovski:
Dnia wtorek, 15 marca 2011 o 10:21:35 Frank Lanitz napisał(a):
moment. I hardly recommend to keep it like this as these are the
'official' pages.
strongly recommend
Stupid
I would offer the hosting and maintenance.
We could use a sub domain like wiki.geany.org, f.e.
2011/3/15 Randy Kramer rhkra...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 10:45:51 am Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 15.03.2011 13:01, schrieb Křištof Želechovski:
Dnia wtorek, 15 marca 2011 o 10:21:35 Frank
Am 15.03.2011 16:30, schrieb Randy Kramer:
I guess you meant to say: heartily recommend.
Whatever you call it ... something with violence ;)
Cheers,
Frank
___
Geany mailing list
Geany@uvena.de
http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 12:00:40 pm Frank Lanitz wrote:
Am 15.03.2011 16:30, schrieb Randy Kramer:
I guess you meant to say: heartily recommend.
Whatever you call it ... something with violence ;)
;-)
___
Geany mailing list
Geany@uvena.de
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
