On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:58, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 04/26/11 11:45, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:18:16 +0200
Jiří Techettec...@gmail.com wrote:
more than two weeks have passed without any response and I fear it
will end the same way as many times
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:58:09 -0700
Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
more than two weeks have passed without any response and I fear it
will end the same way as many times before [...]
Not an exception, the X session management is 9 months old too.
Perhaps we should create a
Le 10/04/2011 15:03, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Hi,
Hi,
first sorry for disappearing for such a long time - I didn't have much
free time left in the past months and from the time I had I dedicated
most of it to the libchamplain library I maintain to make some bigger
changes and adapt it to GTK 3
I understand that if your plugin makes use of some file patterns, it
then makes sense to show them in the FIF dialog. But Geany don't use
project patterns, and adding such patters to projects seems useless to
me since their only usage is to show them in the FIF dialog... but IMHO
they don't
Hi,
I'd like to revive this thread[1]. I wasn't around during the initial
thread but Jiri has just pointed me to it and I read it through. I'd
like to summarize (at least my take) on that thread and then list some
pros and cons to stimulate a discussion.
Disclaimer:
I am not an expert on
Nice summary Matthew,
As far as I remember it, seems to be accurate.
Summary from previous thread:
The people in the thread who do not want to switch to Git, or those who
don't seem to care either way, are those who have commit access to
Subversion on SourceForge. Most (if not all)
On 04/27/11 21:01, Lex Trotman wrote:
- No need to maintain changelog and authors files
Changelog and authors are still needed for tarballs, but maybe they
can be automated?
Seems not too hard with git log and some shell script[1]. I think the
original thread also mentions a way (or that
