On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 02:19, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Even in the case of single-commit features? I completely agree with
more-than-one-commit features because otherwise you don't know where
the feature implementation starts and ends but having it for minor
one-commit
On 26 September 2011 10:21, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
So I was just curious *specifically* what distro(s) and version(s) sets the
oldest version of GTK+ that Geany should support?
I think RHEL in a more or less current version sets a reasonable
benchmark. We have used RHEL 5
On 1 October 2011 13:44, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
It seems to me like this group of users would be very small and require that
they are:
- Enterprise/LTS users running a GUI
- And who are willing to install unsupported software.
That may be the case more often than one
On 11-10-04 05:36 AM, Alexander Eberspächer wrote:
On 1 October 2011 13:44, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
It seems to me like this group of users would be very small and require that
they are:
- Enterprise/LTS users running a GUI
- And who are willing to install unsupported
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 22:15:56 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 15:36, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:52:19 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, there's a bug in the MRU code [...]
Can you please
Hi,
I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are
still a few points unresolved:
I have a few comments (and questions) myself:
1. Some branch names should be renamed (e.g. Geany-0_19_1) because
they have the same name as tags and they are ambiguous when doing git
Hi Jiri,
On 5 October 2011 08:37, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are
still a few points unresolved:
I have a few comments (and questions) myself:
1. Some branch names should be renamed (e.g. Geany-0_19_1) because
Le 04/10/2011 23:37, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Hi,
I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are
still a few points unresolved:
I have a few comments (and questions) myself:
1. Some branch names should be renamed (e.g. Geany-0_19_1) because
they have the same name as
