On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 02:47, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 08/25/2011 03:27 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:51:24 +1000
Lex Trotmanele...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, with DVCS each plugin can have its own repository and the Geany
project only needs to manage the
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:34:20 +0300
Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:27:47 +0200
Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:56:52 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
About plugins - I'd like to see them converted to git
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:47:25 -0700
Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 08/25/2011 03:27 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:51:24 +1000
Lex Trotmanele...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, with DVCS each plugin can have its own repository and the
Geany project only needs to
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:06:28 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
My reasoning was based on past discussions around quality control of
the plugins. As noted in those discussions, plugins are more and more
providing essential capability and the aggregated plugins are being
released in the
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:51:24 +1000
Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Due the huge number of contributors at the plugins project and the,
well quiet often broken build, a more decentralized process would be
good for the plugins. We talked about this a couple of days ago
inside IRC
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:27:47 +0200
Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:56:52 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
About plugins - I'd like to see them converted to git too but for me
it's much less important. Plugins are usually one-man-show and require
On 08/25/2011 03:27 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:51:24 +1000
Lex Trotmanele...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, with DVCS each plugin can have its own repository and the Geany
project only needs to manage the aggregated build.
Yes, this was the outcome on IRC. So once a feature is
On 26 August 2011 10:47, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 08/25/2011 03:27 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:51:24 +1000
Lex Trotmanele...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, with DVCS each plugin can have its own repository and the Geany
project only needs to manage the
On 08/25/2011 07:06 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
I don't know what was said on IRC (since if you don't happen to be
there at the time you can't contribute, and I am not going to search
through days of c**p in the logs)
Nothing noteworthy was said that Frank didn't bring to the list, unless
the
On 26 August 2011 12:49, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 08/25/2011 07:06 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:
I don't know what was said on IRC (since if you don't happen to be
there at the time you can't contribute, and I am not going to search
through days of c**p in the logs)
Nothing
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:56:52 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
About plugins - I'd like to see them converted to git too but for me
it's much less important. Plugins are usually one-man-show and require
much less cooperation than Geany itself and their authors already have
SVN access.
[...]
Due the huge number of contributors at the plugins project and the,
well quiet often broken build, a more decentralized process would be
good for the plugins. We talked about this a couple of days ago inside
IRC and we came to that point, that it would be might useful to make
more usage
12 matches
Mail list logo
