Well well, we've got quite some votes, thanks guys!
However, we can't say there is a clear winner: 0.21 and 1.0 got the same
vote count [1], but 0.21 got one more unique vote [2].
Le 30/09/2011 23:48, Jiří Techet a écrit :
[...]
If it's too late to bump the version number for the upcoming
Le 30/09/2011 03:08, Matthew Brush a écrit :
On 09/29/2011 02:59 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Finally, if you choose something else, you could perhaps elaborate by
responding to this mail :)
2.10 (ie. 0.21 * 10) - because it matches closer to the GTK+ and
Scintilla versions.
Also,
On 11-10-01 07:11 AM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 30/09/2011 03:08, Matthew Brush a écrit :
On 09/29/2011 02:59 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Finally, if you choose something else, you could perhaps elaborate by
responding to this mail :)
2.10 (ie. 0.21 * 10) - because it matches closer to
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:24:55 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 22/09/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:28:21 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 23:59, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 20/09/2011 12:07, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Hi,
Hey,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This would be
just numbering
Le 22/09/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:28:21 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other
Le 20/09/2011 12:07, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Hi,
Hey,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This would be
just numbering change, not some milestone based on features that have
to be implemented (similarly
On 09/29/2011 02:59 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Finally, if you choose something else, you could perhaps elaborate by
responding to this mail :)
2.10 (ie. 0.21 * 10) - because it matches closer to the GTK+ and
Scintilla versions.
Also, 2.21 (ie. 0.21 + 2) would be fine for the same
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 13:02, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 September 2011 20:14, Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0
Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like
''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ...
Heh, I like krumkach, sounds in
Am 22.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like
''busel', 'verabei',
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:28:21 +0200
Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like
''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ...
Heh, I like krumkach, sounds in German quite funny :).
BTW, how are Geany codenames
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 15:34, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Am 22.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000?
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:28:21 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name
like ''busel', 'verabei',
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This would be
just numbering change, not some milestone based on features that have
to be
On 20 September 2011 20:14, Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This would be
just
Hi,
Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Jiří Techet:
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
To make it short: As we are about two weeks ahead of next release I
disagree. After 0.21 release we got a lot of
On 20 September 2011 21:23, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Jiří Techet:
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
To make it short: As we are about two weeks ahead
Am Di, 20.09.2011, 13:43 schrieb Lex Trotman:
On 20 September 2011 21:23, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Hi,
Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Ji?í Techet:
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
To
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like
''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ...
Best regards,
Yura Siamashka
On 20/09/2011, Thomas Martitz thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am Di, 20.09.2011, 13:43 schrieb
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
How about getting rid of the 0 version prefix and calling the next
release 1.0?
+1.0 :) Much more reliable that my primary IDE, which is version 5.
Though I'd prefer to see stash-tree-display-5923.diff (from the last
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Jiří Techet:
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0?
To make it short: As we are about two weeks ahead
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like
''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ...
Heh, I like krumkach, sounds in German quite funny :).
More seriously, I personally don't
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This
24 matches
Mail list logo
