Hi guys,
I saw that the ruby parser don't properly generate tags declarations like:
class Foo::Bar
end
which should generate a tag Bar with the scope Foo; but it
generates a tag Foo and simply ignores Bar. This seems to apply to
modules, classes and methods at least -- almost
Le 06/09/2012 20:58, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
Hi guys,
I saw that the ruby parser don't properly generate tags declarations like:
class Foo::Bar
end
which should generate a tag Bar with the scope Foo; but it
generates a tag Foo and simply ignores Bar. This seems to
On 7 September 2012 04:58, Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Hi guys,
I saw that the ruby parser don't properly generate tags declarations like:
class Foo::Bar
end
which should generate a tag Bar with the scope Foo; but it
generates a tag Foo and simply
Le 07/09/2012 00:49, Lex Trotman a écrit :
On 7 September 2012 04:58, Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org
wrote:
Hi guys,
I saw that the ruby parser don't properly generate tags declarations like:
class Foo::Bar
end
which should generate a tag Bar with the scope
[...]
OK, maybe I could take a look at how the C++ parser parses A::B::C,
maybe they have a better solution; but what I'm saying is that the
Yeah, without much knowledge of Ruby or Vala I was just suggesting
that C++ *seemed* to work different so it might be worth a look
despite the
