Levente wrote:
I think the dependency hell is provided by your OS, not by the
human nor gEDA. If someone can't figure out the dependencies, (s)he
can't use gEDA, and I think no other EDA toolset.
No. I currently use four EDA packages on Linux, for ASIC and FPGA design
and verification, and I
Bob Paddock wrote:
On Monday 31 July 2006 05:26, Levente wrote:
If you have a $10k worth of software, use that. gEDA is for thoes, who don't
(wanna) have.
I have the $15k+ software, Protel, and I think it sucks compared to gEDA/PCB.
It has become so
bloated that there is no consistency in
Bob Paddock wrote:
I think Windows is all I'm allowed to use at work. Like it or not any EDA
tool must run
on Windows, or gEDA's [and friends are] dead in the water if you're only interested in Linux
hobbyists.
Sorry. Last I checked ASIC was an EDA market - and also one where
windows is
The ability to have a GUI that can use SVG is possibly going to be worth
the extra dependency some day, especially if it is becoming mainstream use with
GTK, it will not be one of the unpopular dependencies that thwarts newbies.
SVG is great for postscript-like one-way output, but it also
This paragraph would be helpful in the README.cvs file
John G
Dan McMahill wrote:
When the build system is used to generate the distfile ('make dist' or
preferably 'make distcheck') then the .dvi, .pdf, and .html versions of
the manual are included in the distfile. If you do not use 'make
John Griessen wrote:
This paragraph would be helpful in the README.cvs file
John G
Dan McMahill wrote:
When the build system is used to generate the distfile ('make dist' or
preferably 'make distcheck') then the .dvi, .pdf, and .html versions
of the manual are included in the distfile.
Levente wrote:
I think the dependency hell is provided by your OS, not by the human nor
gEDA. If someone can't figure out the dependencies, (s)he can't use gEDA, and
I think no other EDA toolset.
Nonsense. There are plenty of (expensive) software packages that
do *not* impose on a user
Hi,
To interject my $0.02 CDN.
Stephen Williams wrote:
Levente wrote:
I think the "dependency hell" is provided by your OS, not by the human nor gEDA. If someone can't figure out the dependencies, (s)he can't use gEDA, and I think no other EDA toolset.
Nonsense.
Peter TB Brett wrote:
Hi folks,
If someone can provide me with step-by-step instructions for building geda on
Windows, I'm volunteering to produce a NSIS-based Windows installation
program.
This goes for any packages currently distributed on the gEDA CD. What I need
to produce the
Mike Jarabek wrote:
Hi,
To interject my $0.02 CDN.
Stephen Williams wrote:
Levente wrote:
I think the dependency hell is provided by your OS, not by the human nor
gEDA. If someone can't figure out the dependencies, (s)he can't use gEDA, and I think no
other EDA toolset.
I hesitate to get even further involved, but:
One cannot compare a controlled corporate OS environment with Linux/FreeBSD or
anything similar because of a couple of - maybe not so obvious reasons ( or
maybe very obvious ).
At my last 'controlled corporate' gig we ran Linux/RH7.2 (this was
Hehe, a bit further then...
On Monday 31 July 2006 23:38, Evan Lavelle wrote:
I hesitate to get even further involved, but:
One cannot compare a controlled corporate OS environment with
Linux/FreeBSD or anything similar because of a couple of - maybe not so
obvious reasons ( or maybe very
Hi Tibor,
After doing a rsync backup of my linux installation, I tried it and get gschem
to run and draw lines, pcb to run and draw lines
when launched from the project manager menu. The files wrote to
/root/home/geda/ under the geda-test directory. My distro is debian linux
unstable. All
Ack! I slip away from the 'net/project for a few days and I come back to
several flame fests. Gah, can't we all just get along... :)
Some comments in random order.
* I'm obviously way way way swamped by my inbox and you people are not
helping with all these discussions... :-) I have read
14 matches
Mail list logo
