On Jul 17, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Traylor Roger wrote:
Gang,
I've now finished my third board with gschem/gaf + PCB. I post
these pictures as an encouragement to others. I was was discouraged
at times learning the tools but with the help and support available
I finally pushed out some good
Steven Michalske wrote:
Worked almost right away. Note red wire and missing pullup. Keeps me
humble.
Green wires are less humbling, i suggest them.
I look at design efforts like golf. Low scores are better, but nobody
plays a round with 18 holes-in-one in a row.
My most humbling: back
Hi there,
On Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008, Csányi Pál wrote:
I tried to use tragesym with my favorite text editor Emacs.
I'm using org-mode in Emacs in which one can to create tables.
So I edited the tragesym template.src and made in it the tables for
[options], [geda_attr] and [pins]. I saved
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:10:09 -0700
Traylor Roger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang,
I've now finished my third board with gschem/gaf + PCB. I post
these pictures as an encouragement to others. I was was discouraged
at times learning the tools but with the help and support available
I
Werner Hoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Hi there,
On Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008, Csányi Pál wrote:
I tried to use tragesym with my favorite text editor Emacs.
I'm using org-mode in Emacs in which one can to create tables.
and I get an error message:
Traceback (most recent call last):
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 11:45 -0700, Dave N6NZ wrote:
Steven Michalske wrote:
Worked almost right away. Note red wire and missing pullup. Keeps me
humble.
Green wires are less humbling, i suggest them.
I look at design efforts like golf. Low scores are better, but nobody
plays a
Friends -
OK, really stupid question: is there a standard suffix
to use for Verilog include files? I need something different
from .v, so my Makefiles and scripts can tell them apart:
include files don't get listed on the Icarus command line,
even though they are a dependency listed in the
Reversed polarized cap? Those ones are easy to find upon power up :)
I don't think it is sufficient to rely upon the silk screen to provide
assembly instructions.
For cases like this you really need to provide written assembly
instructions and make following them part of the purchase terms.
But
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:14 -0700, Steve Meier wrote:
Reversed polarized cap? Those ones are easy to find upon power up :)
I don't think it is sufficient to rely upon the silk screen to provide
assembly instructions.
For cases like this you really need to provide written assembly
After I dump them on the board near where I'm working, I just pick
up the upside-down ones and drop them until they land right-side up.
No, silly, those are for the other side of the board.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
from geda-bugs, written by Csanyi Pal:
In xgsch2pcb I wish to have an option to show the PCB in 3D model
when it is accomplished in pcb tool.
I think that there is a possibility to write a script that should
to make an output file for the BRL-CAD free modelling system.
From xgsch2pcb one
On Fri, July 18, 2008 7:44 pm, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
BRL-CAD is broken by design. It suffers from many weaknesses. Not
packeged in major linux distros is just one of them.
That's a pretty strong statement. BRL-CAD has been used with great
success by the US military for many, many years,
I like using the other side resistors like caps, there both
white they do the same thing then.
On Jul 18, 2008, at 4:37 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
After I dump them on the board near where I'm working, I just pick
up the upside-down ones and drop them until they land right-side up.
No,
I started to create a schematic for a capacitive sensing circuit to be used
in an interface for a project I'm working on. I'm using Quantum's QTouch
QT240 IC. I have yet to use PCB and I'd like to get suggestions on how to
represent the electrodes and their footprints in the schematic.
I'm using
How about just making a small copper arc with a big, fat track?
Of course, there is no component and footprint this way.
-dave
DJ Delorie wrote:
If you just want a round electrode, define your footprint as a single
SMT pad, rounded, with the same width and height. This gives you a
big circle
For plain circles, smt pads are easier and better.
If you wanted to do a resistive touch sensor with a circle with a ring
around it, you'd do the circle as a pad and a smaller circle (radius
== ring width) beside it. Then, when you lay out the board, add an
arc centered on the big pad,
Hard responding after the next couple of irelevent repies... tears in my
eyes from laughing... ok sure we expect the assembly shop to do their
job perfect but they seem to come back with any excuse to justify why
they are late. Uhm I am not sure we are much better with our custimers
human nature
17 matches
Mail list logo
