Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?

2010-02-12 Thread Vanessa Ezekowitz
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:55:47 -0500 DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: I still think you're finding an old copy of that file somewhere. Actually, it looks like it's very much the opposite: --prefix is the same for both pcb and geda? Actually, no. Since GEDA is from Gentoo's repository, got

Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?

2010-02-12 Thread DJ Delorie
A symlink would probably solve this, but that feels a little kludgy. Make a symlink. PCB has to install a netlister into gnetlist's install directory. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org

Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?

2010-02-12 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:14 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: A symlink would probably solve this, but that feels a little kludgy. Make a symlink. PCB has to install a netlister into gnetlist's install directory. DJ; Or, you could get PCB to pass the search path to gnetlist. I think that can be

Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?

2010-02-12 Thread Jared Casper
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote: DJ; Or, you could get PCB to pass the search path to gnetlist. I think that can be done using a gafrc file in the temp directory, with (scheme-directory ${SCMDIR}) This could of course clash with an gafrc required by the

Re: gEDA-user: OT: Latex

2010-02-12 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:12 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote: The main use of this macro is to be able to control the pagestyle of a figure which occupies a whole page. By placing: \floatcontrol{\thispagestyle{empty}} between the \begin{figure} and \end{figure}, header/footer/page number is

Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?

2010-02-12 Thread Vanessa Ezekowitz
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:14:41 -0500 DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: A symlink would probably solve this, but that feels a little kludgy. Make a symlink. PCB has to install a netlister into gnetlist's install directory. That helped. I can now import most of a schematic, but it brings up

Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?

2010-02-12 Thread DJ Delorie
1. None of my custom footprints are being pulled into the layout. Do you have the search path set in pcb? The old way used gafrc, the new way uses pcb's own search path. 2. Some pins on PCB's stock footprints are being renamed without corresponding changes being made to the netlist. For

Re: gEDA-user: Action to flip board

2010-02-12 Thread Mark Rages
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:29 AM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: Install this plugin: ... OK, I got all the pieces installed but the copper and component layers are interchanged. What have I done wrong? Regards, Mark markra...@gmail -- Mark Rages, Engineer Midwest Telecine LLC

Re: gEDA-user: Action to flip board

2010-02-12 Thread DJ Delorie
OK, I got all the pieces installed but the copper and component layers are interchanged. What have I done wrong? With or without the swapsides perl script? ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org

Re: gEDA-user: why separate xgsch2pcb?

2010-02-12 Thread Vanessa Ezekowitz
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:47:11 -0500 DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: 1. None of my custom footprints are being pulled into the layout. Do you have the search path set in pcb? The old way used gafrc, the new way uses pcb's own search path. You mean in the Library section of the

Re: gEDA-user: Action to flip board

2010-02-12 Thread Mark Rages
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:30 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: OK, I got all the pieces installed but the copper and component layers are interchanged.  What have I done wrong? With or without the swapsides perl script? Hm, that didn't make it into my Makefile. All good now. Thanks.