On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 22:32 -0800, Jared Casper wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
I can't help but feel that some log messages are important enough to
bother the user about - and others are not.. we'll have to see what
people actually using it
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:36:48 +, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
BUT.. this should also be using the gEDA font size - points conversion.
The 13 vs 13.89 discrepency is already incorporated in the 1.3 factor
shipped by default.
If I remember correctly, printed line spacing was
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:01:55PM -0500, gene glick wrote:
what else? Any suggestions?
Check your hole dimensions, especially on connectors - a correctly-routed
board is not much use if your connector pins won't fit through the
holes...
--
David SmithWork Email: dave.sm...@st.com
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:16:49 -0500, Charles Lepple clep...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think the Fedora build is silently accepting the other directory
under BUILDROOT:
Making install in po
make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/geda-gaf-1.6.0/
libgeda/po'
/usr/bin/make
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:30:20 +, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 22:32 -0800, Jared Casper wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
I can't help but feel that some log messages are important enough to
bother the user about -
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:48 +, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:30:20 +, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 22:32 -0800, Jared Casper wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
I can't help but feel that some log
Hi all,
-Original Message-
From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
[mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Peter Clifton
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 11:30 AM
To: gEDA user mailing list
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Message and Library windows
On Tue, 2010-02-23
Stephan Boettcher boettc...@physik.uni-kiel.de writes:
Julian thepurl...@gmail.com writes:
Stephan,
Yes, you can do it, however you can't use the project file for the
process. Here's how:
gerbv --export=png --dpi=600 --foreground=#ffff
--foreground=#00ff0088 file1.gbx file2.gbx
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:48:14 +
Peter TB Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk wrote:
Why not have a bar (in a warning colour) that pops up at the top of the
layout window, and disappears after a short interval (say, 2 seconds).
Clicking the bar would bring up the message window.
I like this idea, but
Ladies and Gentlemen -
Is there an update to gschem scheduled, and if so, when? Is there a
release notes that we can view to know what is coming?
Thanks!
Tony Radice
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:22:05 -0500, Tony Radice tradi...@verizon.net
wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen -
Is there an update to gschem scheduled, and if so, when? Is there a
release notes that we can view to know what is coming?
We just released 1.6.1 in the current stable release series, but
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 08:22 -0500, Tony Radice wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen -
Is there an update to gschem scheduled, and if so, when? Is there a
release notes that we can view to know what is coming?
The weekend before last..
http://geda.seul.org/release/v1.6/1.6.1/
Release notes not yet
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:53:13 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
I can't help but feel that some log messages are important enough to
bother the user about
I suggest, that gschem (and pcb for that matter) stick to the way most
unix applications handle this issue: Truely important messages should be
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:18:02 -0500, gene glick wrote:
I'll have to order up a bunch of
parts to make it happen but that's ok.
This is an important part of the check. It is too easy to misread some
aspect of the physical dimensions in the data sheet. Think SO16 vs SO16-
wide. This has hit me
I just got aware of the open source mechanical CAD project freecad. It
hit the debian repository a month ago. Although it is still lacking
important features, much of the basic infrastructure is already up and
running.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeCAD_(Juergen_Riegel)
al davis wrote:
On Tuesday 23 February 2010, John Griessen wrote:
Would you still use gschem/gnetlist to schematically connect
verilog modules? That depends on having a good translator
first, right?
Anything that generates a netlist.
Gnucap uses language plugins to read whatever input
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:01 PM, gene glick carzr...@optonline.net wrote:
After a very long time, I am just about ready to send out 3 different boards
for fab. I would appreciate any advice to improve my chances of success.
I'm making the assumption you will have a contractor build quantities
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:32:20 -0800, Jared Casper wrote:
Maybe add a Warn function along side Message (or something along those
lines), and add a flag to HID.log that says whether or not to bring the
log window to the foreground? Or go all out and add an enum for
severity. It'd be easy to add
Hi -
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:40:50PM -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
I'm making the assumption you will have a contractor build quantities someday,
in automated equipment. These will (at least should) lower production costs:
Although OT, I appreciate and try to learn from discussions like this.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Larry Doolittle
ldool...@recycle.lbl.gov wrote:
Hi -
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:40:50PM -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
I'm making the assumption you will have a contractor build quantities
someday,
in automated equipment. These will (at least should) lower
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:07:13PM -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
I've learned most of this by working at a large CM, and 'The Hard Way'
of doing it wrong.
For example the job today is 5,000 boards. When you get into
quantities, you start to do things
differently. See the note at the bottom
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Larry Doolittle
ldool...@recycle.lbl.gov wrote:
Hi -
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:40:50PM -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
I'm making the assumption you will have a contractor build
quantities someday,
in automated
Bob Paddock wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Larry Doolittle
ldool...@recycle.lbl.gov wrote:
Have you put Fudicuals on components, such as tiny QFN packages, or
even massive TQFP and BGAs.
I don't think you said what you wanted to say.
Not sure. I know our CM loves that I put
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Frank Bergmann
frank.g...@frajasalo.de wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:32:20 -0800, Jared Casper wrote:
The functionality I saw someplace (was it in your repo?) to attach/embed
the log window to the main window will help out with this problem as
well I think.
I would have just ensured that my AVR image didn't contain any
sequences that trigger the problem. It might be possible to just
modify AVRdude to detect such sequences and modify the programming
sequence to avoid them. Sort of like bit stuffing with NRZI.
I'm sorry, you cannot program an
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:42:32 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
gschem's log window can be persuaded not to appear with this rhune in a
gschemrc. (I have it in ~/.gEDA/gschemrc)
(log-window later)
I added this to the gschem-FAQ
---(kaimartin)---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
I would have just ensured that my AVR image didn't contain any sequences
that trigger the problem.
How? Its a crap shoot as to know if any particular image will
generate the bad sequence.
Then you waste time trying to figure out how to get around it.
To DJ's comment. We usually do go with
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 04:41:35PM -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
I would have just ensured that my AVR image didn't contain any sequences
that trigger the problem.
How? Its a crap shoot as to know if any particular image will
generate the bad sequence.
Then you waste time trying to figure
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:01 PM, gene glick
[1]carzr...@optonline.net wrote:
After a very long time, I am just about ready to send out 3
different boards
for fab. ?I would appreciate any advice to improve my chances of
success.
Don't send all three at once.
Could be interesting.
Thanks for that!
Cheers,
Andy.
Signality Solutions
York, UK
t: +44 (0) 5601 720 580
m: +44 (0) 7796 538 192
skype: andyfierman
www.signality.co.uk
On 24 February 2010 15:12, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
I just got aware of the open source
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:22:54 -0600, John Griessen wrote:
So these footprint fiducials are outboard of the part so they show in a
vision system as the part is being placed? Do you put silk outline
outside them or some silk circles around each one to clue the CM about
what they are good for,
gene glick wrote:
After a very long time, I am just about ready to send out 3 different
boards for fab. I would appreciate any advice to improve my chances of
success. So far here's what has been done:
1. Run DRC on all PCBs with no issues..
2. Checked schematics.
3. Checked schematic
don't even consider ordering boards without loading up the photoplot files
into something like gerbv and doing some sanity checks. This advice applies
to a design done with any layout tool and not just pcb. A minimal list would
be:
- From 20,000 feet, does each layer look right or are there
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
To DJ's comment. We usually do go with pre-programmed parts
eventually. Solder jumpers
are a really bad idea when doing anything more than few boards. Even
zero ohm resisters jumpers
cost real money.
I believe it was my comment that
So these footprint fiducials are outboard of the part so they show in a
vision system as the part is being placed? Do you put silk outline outside
them or some silk circles around each one to clue
the CM about what they are good for, or does that just need some notes and
documentation and
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Steven Michalske smichal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
To DJ's comment. We usually do go with pre-programmed parts
eventually. Solder jumpers
are a really bad idea when doing anything more than few boards. Even
zero
On Feb 24, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Steven Michalske smichal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
To DJ's comment. We usually do go with pre-programmed parts
eventually. Solder jumpers
are a really bad idea
On Tuesday 23 February 2010, Dave N6NZ wrote:
Really? Is there a use for gEDA-Eagle?
Lots of reasons.
Whether you like it or not, it is popular. Some people will
insist on it.
If gEDA is ever to replace Eagle, there needs to be a migration
path both ways.
If Free/open-source is ever to
Hello,
If you are in PCB and you bring up the command window you can use
ChangeName(Layout)
and it will allow you to change the name of the layout visible in the
fab drawing gerber file.
Which command changes the author name? I tried working with
fab-author (and author and originator along
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
I just got aware of the open source mechanical CAD project freecad. It
hit the debian repository a month ago. Although it is still lacking
important features, much of the basic infrastructure is already up and
running.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Peter TB Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:16:49 -0500, Charles Lepple clep...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think the Fedora build is silently accepting the other directory
under BUILDROOT:
Making install in po
make[3]: Entering directory
fab-author is a user setting, not a board setting. You can do pcb
--fab-author me ... or put it in ~/.pcb/settings:
fab-author: Me
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
42 matches
Mail list logo
