I was going through the gEDA tutorial and though it lists footprints
for the tutorial, it does not say how I would determine what footprints
to use for other components. For instance I have a schematic with a
couple LEDs on it and a radial style electrolytic capacitor. The
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:25:25 -0700
blueeag...@gmail.com wrote:
I was going through the gEDA tutorial and though it lists footprints for the
tutorial, it does not say how I would determine what footprints to use for
other components. For instance I have a schematic with a couple LEDs on it
blueeag...@gmail.com wrote:
I was going through the gEDA tutorial and though it lists footprints for
the tutorial, it does not say how I would determine what footprints to use
for other components.
You just hit a major weakness of the geda-pcb work-flow. There is not much
in the tools to aid
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 11:41 -0500, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
What I've found myself doing for this is to run PCB and flip through
its footprint library until I find the particular footprint I want,
Of course, if you have an idea of the name of the footprint (i.e. from
Datasheet) one may try
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 19:20 +0200, kai-martin knaak wrote:
blueeag...@gmail.com wrote:
I was going through the gEDA tutorial and though it lists footprints for
the tutorial, it does not say how I would determine what footprints to use
for other components.
You just hit a major weakness
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 19:20 +0200, kai-martin knaak wrote:
blueeag...@gmail.com wrote:
I was going through the gEDA tutorial and though it lists footprints for
the tutorial, it does not say how I would determine what
Stefan Salewski wrote:
Much more difficult is to ensure that all your
footprints on your PCB board really match with your devices. One has to
do a printout of the PCB board and place all devices on it. Next time,
when you order parts from a different company, you may get other shapes
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 13:05 -0500, Mark Rages wrote:
gschem-pcb is farther to the right on Kathy Sierra's graphic than any
other software I regularly use:
http://headrush.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/04/06/kickasscurvetwo.jpg
Just hang in there, it makes more sense
If I order resistors, size 0805, they better fit a 0805 footprint ;-)
Seriously, can you give an example for parts with arbitrary footprint?
SMT connectors
SOIC
TQFN
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
DJ Delorie wrote on the other list, were mere mortals like me are not
allowed to post:
I don't know. My conundrum at the moment is that pcb is at 1.99z so
we're out of letters,
why not go on with either 1.100, or 1.991, or 1.99za, or 1.99æ ...
Seriously, I'd love to see some form of more
On Jul 17, 2010, at 8:53 AM, kai-martin knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
DJ Delorie wrote on the other list, were mere mortals like me are not
allowed to post:
I don't know. My conundrum at the moment is that pcb is at 1.99z so
we're out of letters,
why not go on with either
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 20:29 +0200, kai-martin knaak wrote:
Stefan Salewski wrote:
If I order resistors, size 0805, they better fit a 0805 footprint ;-)
Seriously, can you give an example for parts with arbitrary footprint?
---)kaimartin(---
Of course. Many ICs of my DSO board are
On Jul 17, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Mark Rages wrote:
gschem-pcb is farther to the right on Kathy Sierra's graphic than any
other software I regularly use:
http://headrush.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/04/06/kickasscurvetwo.jpg
The curves as drawn are nonsense. Generally they cross, at
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:32 PM, John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Jul 17, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Mark Rages wrote:
gschem-pcb is farther to the right on Kathy Sierra's graphic than any
other software I regularly use:
Thanks, same for the clear explanation on conformal coating.
Bob Paddock wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Armin Faltl [1]armin.fa...@aon.at
wrote:
Hi,
while I can clearly live without that feature, I read that blind and
burried vias
are not possible with PCB.
When I do an update layout with xgsch2pcb I get a syntax error at line
20.
This is what is at line 20.What is wrong with this other than there
is nothing inside the brackets. I tried deleting it from the .pcb file
and it gives the same error.
Symbol(' ' 18)
(
)
16 matches
Mail list logo
