Hi all,
-Original Message-
From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
[mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of
ge...@igor2.repo.hu
Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 7:06 AM
To: gEDA user mailing list
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Resistor values???
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:44:54 -0500
John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
Often, perhaps, but not usually. No matter how you slice it, the most
common way to use such a symbol and its corresponding physical
representation is as a component on a circuit board or in an IC.
Maybe for you. But
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 19:31 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it in Ruby,
using GTK/Cairo.
No, the project is not death...
I just managed to draw to a GTK drawing area,
Ran without any user intervention on Fedora 13. Installed Ruby
some time ago without knowing if I would ever use it.
Depending on the window sizing, either the top/bottom horizontal
line heights or the left/right vertical line widths do not display fully.
George
On 12/26/2010 08:48 AM, Stefan
Peter Clifton:
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 16:06 +0100, Karl Hammar wrote:
...
Like, here is a led and resistor, we want to feed it with 12V, 5V etc.,
or is that more a job for gschem?
That is beyond what we probably want to teach gschem.
Ok.
Explicit parameter passing between hierarchy modules
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 09:28 -0500, George M. Gallant, Jr. wrote:
Ran without any user intervention on Fedora 13. Installed Ruby
some time ago without knowing if I would ever use it.
Fine!
Depending on the window sizing, either the top/bottom horizontal
line heights or the left/right
Hi Stefan,
-Original Message-
From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
[mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Salewski
Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 2:49 PM
To: gEDA user mailing list
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Working on a tiny schematics editor
On Thu,
I would be interested how many people can run the demo script (peted.rb)
from the top of the above page. Are the needed rcairo bindings shipped
with distributions like Ubuntu? If not, then it may be easier for people
to install the whole gEDA package than to get such a short ruby script
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 11:30 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
I would be interested how many people can run the demo script (peted.rb)
from the top of the above page. Are the needed rcairo bindings shipped
with distributions like Ubuntu? If not, then it may be easier for people
to install the
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 11:30 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
I would be interested how many people can run the demo script (peted.rb)
from the top of the above page. Are the needed rcairo bindings shipped
with
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 17:47 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
Please try to execute
/usr/share/doc/ruby-pango-0.19.4/sample/pango_cairo.rb
If that fails, please add some comment to above bug reports.
Or try
/usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb
Should fail too, with
Or try
/usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb
Should fail too, with the same message as my script.
All related to the missing rb_cairo.h -- some Gentoo people seem to
think that it is obsolete, but it seems to be needed on some boxes.
Stephan, this project is interesting. I'll try it on Ubuntu when I get back to
Noqsi. I think I'll pass on trying it on a Mac for now (all I have here in
Cambridge).
I am puzzled, however, by your motivation:
On Dec 26, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
I think one reason for start
Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de writes:
I think one reason for start writing it was my desire to assign
attributes/classes to subnets, to transfer this information to PCB to
support manually- and auto-routing with already specified parameters for
traces.
Why do you need a gschem
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:38 -0500, John Doty wrote:
Stephan, this project is interesting. I'll try it on Ubuntu when I get
back to Noqsi. I think I'll pass on trying it on a Mac for now (all I
have here in Cambridge).
I am puzzled, however, by your motivation:
I wrote something about it in
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 18:57 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de writes:
I think one reason for start writing it was my desire to assign
attributes/classes to subnets, to transfer this information to PCB to
support manually- and auto-routing with already
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 14:01 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
Is your box also AMD64 no multilib profile?
I did not recall what I'd installed, and it looks like no specific
profile is set, which might be the problem in itself:
Interesting.
For me no-multilib is marked with the star, and I do
On Dec 26, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:44:54 -0500
John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
Often, perhaps, but not usually. No matter how you slice it, the most
common way to use such a symbol and its corresponding physical
representation is as a component
I did not recall what I'd installed, and it looks like no specific
profile is set, which might be the problem in itself:
Interesting.
For me no-multilib is marked with the star
Yes, the selected profile is indicated with star.
and I do not really like to change it.
Me either, however I
I have created a footprint for an edge connector. I created the fingers
the way I would create pads.
However looking at the paste gerber created, this means that solder
paste is put on the fingers, which I don't want.
How can I change this?
Philipp
Add a nopaste flag to those pads. You might have to use a text editor
to do that.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Flexibility and specific applicability are not mutually exclusive, and for
the very reasons you are citing here.
True, but what makes this possible? It's *avoiding* specificity in the
foundations.
I find that statement odd. If the foundation is not well specified
then it is not a
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 14:33 -0500, John Doty wrote:
On Dec 26, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
I have to modify the netlister and gschem -- gschem tries to be smart
and makes one single net when multiple net segments are in a straight
line.
Doesn't putting:
(net-consolidate
On Dec 26, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Bob Paddock wrote:
Flexibility and specific applicability are not mutually exclusive, and for
the very reasons you are citing here.
True, but what makes this possible? It's *avoiding* specificity in the
foundations.
I find that statement odd. If the
John Doty j...@noqsi.com writes:
One crazy configuration was to reduce the number of bits/photon to
one, and thereby achieve two orders of magnitude better time
resolution than most people thought necessary while staying within
data transmission restrictions. I'm told that this has been the
On 26 December 2010 02:55, Mark Rages markra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 4:16 PM, John Coppens j...@jcoppens.com wrote:
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:20:03 +0100
kai-martin knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
It about finding authors.
I'm not entirely sure about that. I think there
Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de writes:
OK, shame on me for missing that option. But I do not think that this
really proves that a gschem rewrite is obsolete.
I may believe that writing a second gschem editor is worse use of your
time than improving the existing one, but it is not up to me
On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 01:27 +0100, Michael Theurl wrote:
Hello List,
I try to export the TOP and BOTTOM eps files
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:pcb_tips#how_can_i_print_the_bottom_side_of_the_board
pcb -x eps --layer-stack silk,solderside ..
The wiki calls it solderside, not only
thanxs a lot. It works now
here the working script:
pcb -x eps --element-color '#00' \
--pin-color '#cc' \
--layer-color-1 '#ff' \
--layer-color-2 '#ff' \
--layer-color-3 '#ff' \
--layer-stack solderside,solder,silk \
--eps-file BOTTOM-$PROJECT_NAME.eps \
--as-shown
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Eduardo Costa ecosta@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 December 2010 02:55, Mark Rages markra...@gmail.com wrote:
If it will stop the bikeshedding here, I volunteer to translate a
tutorial from crayon-on-napkin into LaTeX or DocBook or whatever. I
believe that the
On Dec 26, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
All the NASA QA, reviews, and stuff were annoying at first, but in the
end there always were smart people asking the right questions at the
right time to the right people.
Well, you've had better luck than I have. In three decades of
On Saturday 25 December 2010, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
* If the part in question can usually be described by a
single value, for the purposes of the signal flow in the
schematic that is, then give it a default of value=0.
No. Zero is almost always wrong. The only sensible default
value in
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de wrote:
Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it in Ruby,
using GTK/Cairo.
I while ago I started my own schematics editor - pschem:
33 matches
Mail list logo
