On 27 May 2011 05:33, John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
It seems to me that the first step to switching languages here is for
somebody to:
1. Define a mapping of the .sch/.sym file format into a data structure.
2. Implement a parser that reads a file into such a structure.
I don't think this
On 27/05/2011, Gareth Edwards gar...@edwardsfamily.org.uk wrote:
On 27 May 2011 05:33, John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
It seems to me that the first step to switching languages here is for
somebody to:
1. Define a mapping of the .sch/.sym file format into a data structure.
2. Implement a
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 13:33 +0900, John Doty wrote:
Hmm, Python seems popular,
Eagle, Windows, Basic, Java are popular too -- if popularity is your
concern.
Seriously -- I am not too happy that Python is praised, but Ruby is
mentioned only a few times here. Both languages are very similar.
This is more anecdotal than anything else...
I'm a Perl fan myself.
(shudder)
Just before I learned Perl (WAY before python existed, before perl 5
even), my manager was talking to *his* manager about this nifty new
tool called perl that they just discovered. Apparently, their
metric for
Please try to make format bumps so, that it is still possible to
share geda/pcb documents in a heterogeneous environment.
My desire for any bump is as follows:
* Version N adds support for the feature
* Version N+1 may require it in saved files.
So problems should only happen when you want
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
Shortly after, I needed it, so I learned it. It'll be the same with
Python, just like it was with Scheme. I'm a compiler engineer -
picking up languages is second nature to me.
Python is really easy to learn. Dive in:
I will put together such a combined symbol and footprint lib
in my section of gedasymbols. May take about a week or so.
Excellent! Thanks!
This implies changes to the way gschem, gnetlist and PCB search for
libs. Currently, the only way to replace the default library is to
actually
Hmm, Python seems popular, but my Python capability is limited to:
Sounds like my guile capabilities :-)
1. Define a mapping of the .sch/.sym file format into a data structure.
2. Implement a parser that reads a file into such a structure.
I might try this for PCB-Perl just for fun.
to do the second part of that. Happy for me to continue and publish?
Please!
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
How hard is it to install Ruby on Windows, or Mac, and use it from our
ports of gEDA and PCB ?
I think readily available on all platforms is just as important as
many people know how to use it and it meets our technical needs.
___
geda-user mailing
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 12:33 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
How hard is it to install Ruby on Windows, or Mac, and use it from our
ports of gEDA and PCB ?
According to the following references, seems that at least one method
is pretty straight forward and easy.
-Original Message-
From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
[mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of DJ Delorie
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:55 AM
To: gEDA user mailing list
Subject: gEDA-user: Perl
...
You can implement arrays of hashes, hashes of arrays, arrays
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:54 AM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
This is more anecdotal than anything else...
I'm a Perl fan myself.
(shudder)
Oh goody! flame war bate!
I stopped liking perl when I learned why this script didn't do what I
expected it to do:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
my
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:33 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
How hard is it to install Ruby on Windows, or Mac, and use it from our
ports of gEDA and PCB ?
I think readily available on all platforms is just as important as
many people know how to use it and it meets our technical
On 05/26/2011 07:40 PM, John Doty wrote:
If the consensus is that gnetlist is the place to perform the transformations
we're discussing, then we're in Scheme territory, I think.
I can't see abandoning guile/scheme. I've even written scripts
in Cadence skill language, which is pretty much
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 10:03 +0200, Richard Rasker wrote:
- Work flow of newer gschem/PCB version: until recently, I worked with
an older PCB version (20080202), but I finally got round to compiling
and installing the latest version -- and it's quite an improvement (no
more disappearing
Hello Kai-Martin,
I have had a first look at your patch. You are right - nearly the whole
documentation for the command-line actions is not up to date. So I
think, the contend of your patch would improve the documentation a lot.
First thing: The patch does not apply to my git repository :-(.
DJ,
while reading your comments about gschem and pcb requesting ALL the
'packets' that match the partial information in order to fill in gaps
reminds me of another minor problem I have with the occasional work _I_
do. I usually start with an Atmel microcontroller and add on parts
but could the 'packet' of data also have choices for alternate
naming in the schematic of pins with multiple uses?
Perhaps that kind of choice could be part of the symbol itself, not
part of the component data? It would have to be independent of the
symbolic name we use in the packet, but
On May 28, 2011, at 12:54 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
This is more anecdotal than anything else...
I'm a Perl fan myself.
(shudder)
Just before I learned Perl (WAY before python existed, before perl 5
even), my manager was talking to *his* manager about this nifty new
tool called perl
20 matches
Mail list logo
