Hi,
On 02/08/2011 19:49, Colin D Bennett wrote:
He said H.264 which is significantly compressed, or composite video,
which would probably be an analog signal.
For H.264, you could possibly use 802.11g. The possibilities really
depend on other system constraints. What are the sending and
Hey all,
I've recently been playing around with designing footprints by
describing a set of constraints that position features relative to each
other. This is rather than specifying the absolute co-ordinates of
every feature.
I've written a small tool that allows this to be done. It pumps out
I understand...
It is a result of symbol nature and Wedana drawing abilities.
Symbols usually have their objects near 0:0, Wedana coordinate system
is x=0:infinite, y=0:infinite (no negative values, like in gEDA)
So just now there is no way to center symbol drawn on the left bottom.
On 08/08/11 06:21, Chris Smith wrote:
I'm guessing that composite will be easier to work with?
Depends on the video sender products you find. If there's one for analog,
that's problem solved. Do you have plenty of power at both ends?
Google shows that there are plenty of video sender
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Josh Jordan outerspacema...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have given osx a good try and found it
lacks basic features such as expanding a window to take up half the
screen, you have to buy an app for that!
You can also use ShiftIt [1].
--
Andrea
[1]
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 03:47 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote:
Hey all,
I've recently been playing around with designing footprints by
describing a set of constraints that position features relative to each
other. This is rather than specifying the absolute co-ordinates of
every feature.
On 08/08/2011 15:50, John Griessen wrote:
On 08/08/11 06:21, Chris Smith wrote:
I'm guessing that composite will be easier to work with?
Depends on the video sender products you find. If there's one for analog,
that's problem solved. Do you have plenty of power at both ends?
I think so,
Rob Spanton wrote:
I've written more information about it in a blog post, where you'll also
find a link to the code:
https://xgoat.com/wp/2011/08/08/playing-with-footprints-and-constraints/
Nice!
This is the way to go.
Get rid of grid based design, enter constrains and let the system figure
On 08/07/11 21:47, Rob Spanton wrote:
https://xgoat.com/wp/2011/08/08/playing-with-footprints-and-constraints/
The tool is by no means complete... it's the result of just a few hours
work right now.
Thanks for sharing that, looks like python style of
sub-function.sub-function.function()
I have been thinking about such a footprint editor as well. I think
such a parametric sketcher is the way forward. At least it would make
drawing footprints much more fun! It might be possible to use code
from Sketchflat or pSketcher to obtain this functionality.
http://cq.cx/sketchflat.pl
Stefan Salewski wrote:
Do we have a list of all available generators? Would be useful to find
the best one for a special type of footprint.
IMHO, generators that proved to be useful should be bundled with PCB. This
also applies to plug-ins. If this bothers the devs, a seperate goodie
package
Hello together,
thank you very much for the very interesting answers ... ;-)
Actually I am just using my Ubunutu Linux in a Virtual Box. I would like to
do more with Linux, but I do not have the time.
In my live at work, I just have Windows available (with Mentor Boardstation
in X-Windows).
Jasper wrote:
Another option might be to use a parametric cad program to draw the
footprint, export as a dxf or similar and then convert.
Did anyone mention freecad? The footprint might be part of a 3D model :-)
sourceforge.net/projects/free-cad/
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 03:47:25 +0100
Rob Spanton rspan...@zepler.net wrote:
I've recently been playing around with designing footprints by
describing a set of constraints that position features relative to
each other. This is rather than specifying the absolute co-ordinates
of every feature.
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 03:47 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote:
The tool is by no means complete... it's the result of just a few hours
work right now. Anyway, I hope either the tool or the concept of the
tool might be of use to at least some in the gEDA community.
Certainly a feature like this will
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 10:48:19PM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 03:47 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote:
The tool is by no means complete... it's the result of just a few hours
work right now. Anyway, I hope either the tool or the concept of the
tool might be of use to at
If you go analog you can also send digital data through the Audio
channel (low bandwidth, just for commands, or telemetry depending on
direction of communication)
Regards, Felipe.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Chris Smith [1]cj...@zepler.net
wrote:
On 08/08/2011 15:50,
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Rob Spanton rspan...@zepler.net wrote:
Hey all,
I've recently been playing around with designing footprints by
describing a set of constraints that position features relative to each
other. This is rather than specifying the absolute co-ordinates of
every
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:16:11PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
The procedures with no_drc look unchanged. I still don't see a way
to make this work. I give up and write a bug report.
Bump.
(Whenever I get a chance, if you have not reported this, then I
will. But that might not be for
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
The procedures with no_drc look unchanged. I still don't see a way
to make this work. I give up and write a bug report.
:(
Of course, I still have to satisfy the design rules of my fab. My board
is 100 µm copper on inner layers and 35 mm on outer. The fab requires
20 matches
Mail list logo
