Hi Andrew and all,
-Original Message-
From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
[mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Poelstra
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:52 AM
To: k...@familieknaak.de; gEDA user mailing list
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Layer button
2011/8/18 Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca:
Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
Looks good. It resembles GtkTreeView and that raises a question - will
it still be possible to toggle visibility without changing the active
layer (moving
2011/8/17 Stephen Ecob silicon.on.inspirat...@gmail.com:
If you're willing to help then please check out the shop and let me
know if there's anything amiss - would you consider buying the
product, or is there something in the site that would deter you ?
From a perspective of Firefox user
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:05:33 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
I think such a thing would look like:
http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/selector.png
What do people think of this?
Invisibility by greyed out buttons is much more easily grasped
Which browser and OS are you using ?
Chrome (with default settings i.e. JS enabled) on WinXP Pro SP3 32 bit.
Haven't tried it at home with FF on LMDE 64 bit.
:)
BTW; just submitted a couple of your pages to:
http://validator.w3.org/
Quite a few errors. H.
:(
Andy
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:48:31 +0200
Bert Timmerman bert.timmer...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I think such a thing would look like:
http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/selector.png
What do people think of this?
IMHO, the former proposal with visibilty buttons without rectangles
is the improvement
Steven Michalske wrote:
I really like this one. Bonus points for setting layer color by
clicking on the colored rectangle.
This should be part of a properties dialog for the respective layer.
Properties may include attributes like skip-DRC, DRC rules specific
to this layer, layer name,
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
Layer names with white background are much easier to read than white
on color we have now. If it were me, the colored squares could be a
tad larger without increasig the
DJ Delorie wrote:
I think the concept of import/exporting into a spreadsheet program
is an approach worthy of consideration as well.
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/dj_delorie/tools/sch2csv
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/dj_delorie/tools/csv2sch
Sure, comma separated lists can be imported
Павел Таранов wrote:
We need a library as big as possible (not just basic symbols).
ack.
In an ideal world, we'd have both: A comprehesive lib of symbols,
footprints and simulation models that represent all existing components.
And a subset that represents a reasonalble choice to begin with.
I am happy that doc is still useful.
Best Wishes to All here at geda,
Steve M.
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 08:44 -0500, kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Colin D Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:35:46 -0500 (CDT)
kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
I am sure this has been done
Bert Timmerman wrote:
BTW, we could truncate layernames in buttons:
ack.
pins/pads -- leads
Better: Divide these. Pads are different from pins. Pads reside on only
one layer while pins are spanning all layers. During my recent multilayer
layout it would have been handy to disable pads but
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 04:12:34AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
Layer names with white background are much easier to read than white
on color we have now. If it
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:29:13AM +0200, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
2011/8/18 Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca:
Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
Looks good. It resembles GtkTreeView and that raises a question - will
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Poelstra [1]as...@sfu.ca
wrote:
2. Whenever you hide a layer, the selector would jump to the
previously-selected layer. I haven't tried it yet, but I
think that from a user's perspective that would make the
visibility
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Jared Casper wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Poelstra [1]as...@sfu.ca
wrote:
2. Whenever you hide a layer, the selector would jump to the
previously-selected layer. I haven't tried it yet, but I
think
Very possible. But you would still be unable to toggle visibility
independent of selection using the mouse. How important is this
to people? It bothers me, but only because there is no keyboard
shortcut in Gtk for toggling visibility.
Ctrl-n doesn't toggle visibility? That's what the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:13:37PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Very possible. But you would still be unable to toggle visibility
independent of selection using the mouse. How important is this
to people? It bothers me, but only because there is no keyboard
shortcut in Gtk for toggling
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:25:06 -0700
Jared Casper jaredcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
2. Whenever you hide a layer, the selector would jump to the
previously-selected layer. I haven't tried it yet, but I
think that from
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:50:25AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
I really dislike the double-click idea. I often need to quickly
enable/disable visibility of multiple layers, and the last thing I need
is to have to double-click each button. I would much prefer a small
region on the button
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:57:33 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:50:25AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
I like the color swatch and how it shows a small
rectangle of the layer color when the layer is hidden; if this
swatch were the show/hide toggle, that
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:49:22AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:57:33 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:50:25AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
I like the color swatch and how it shows a small
rectangle of the layer color when
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Joshua [1]jos...@laserlinc.com
wrote:
I agree with Delorie. I also was only making slow progress with
gattrib. I found the copy and paist functionality limited and
strange. I also was confronted with the add column bug. If I
remember
Stephen Ecob wrote:
Can they
be shrunk and still be clear enough not to look silly? That would
speed up page loading.
Thanks, I think I'll do that.
The only time I got noticable download delays was with the details
page for each product. IMHO, it would be best to use the same image
as in
Colin D Bennett wrote:
I really dislike the double-click idea. I often need to quickly
enable/disable visibility of multiple layers,
Nothing beats accel-keys for fast actions. In this case [ctrl-N] or
[shift-N] would be the natural choice.
and the last thing I need is to have to
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
I like KMK's
click/double-click idea if possible.
Very possible. But you would still be unable to toggle visibility
independent of selection using the mouse.
Why is this so? Are double clicked items automatically selected
in GTK widgets?
How important is this
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:34:04PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
I like KMK's
click/double-click idea if possible.
Very possible. But you would still be unable to toggle visibility
independent of selection using the mouse.
Why is this so? Are double
27 matches
Mail list logo
