Hello all,
Am 19.08.2011 02:47, schrieb Andrew Poelstra:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:13:37PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Ctrl-n doesn't toggle visibility? That's what the lesstif HID uses.
No. There is code in there to do this, but (to the best of my
knowledge) it has never worked. The current
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:05:30 -0400
John Hudak jjhu...@gmail.com wrote:
So, this causes me to ask the question: Why hasen't gattrib been
removed from:http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gaf as well as any
other instances?
While the concept is good, the implementation is worthless, and
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:12:57 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
Colin D Bennett wrote:
I really dislike the double-click idea. I often need to quickly
enable/disable visibility of multiple layers,
Nothing beats accel-keys for fast actions. In this case [ctrl-N] or
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 22:22:11 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:34:04PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
I like KMK's
click/double-click idea if possible.
Very possible. But you would still be unable to toggle visibility
On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:05 PM, John Hudak wrote:
So, this causes me to ask the question: Why hasen't gattrib been
removed from:[3]http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gaf as well as
any
other instances?
Perhaps because some of us use it.
While the concept is
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
I have increased the swatch size. Take a look at:
http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup3.png
Nice. Although the font is larger than with the current widget,
the whole stack is still significantly smaller. And it looks less
crowded, too :-)
The swatches are far
John Hudak wrote:
My expectation (hope, guess?) was with an effort that is open source, users
would contribute their symbols to the library, and the symbol library would
be huge. I didn't find that reality. I assumed this because users would
'giveback' to the community. Clearly some have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 11:16:11PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
The procedures with no_drc look unchanged. I still don't see a way
to make this work. I give up and write a bug report.
Bump.
Rebump.
(Whenever I
Felix Ruoff wrote:
Ctrl-n doesn't toggle visibility? That's what the lesstif HID uses.
..snip..
I would not like to use ctrl+n for this because for GTK+ (and propably
other GUI frameworks) this is the default action for 'New...'. (as
actually set in gpcb-menu.res).
This meant control key
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 18:57 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
That is how I would like it to work. But clicking the swatch
also selects the layer, which is undesirable behavior. There
is no clean way to prevent this with a GtkTreeView widget.
Is there any dirty way to prevent it? ;)
I note that
What is mfgs?
Manufacturers?
(Not sure why they'd be bothered to contribute symbols anyway. They do
very few for commercial packages.)
Andy.
signality.co.uk
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
--
It's useful for touch up of a few attributes, but not for the broad
changes you want. The spreadsheet approach really doesn't scale well
anyway. If you have 300 bypass capacitors in a project, it's much more
efficient to have a heavy project-specific bypass capacitor symbol
with all of the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:40 PM, John Doty [1]j...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:05 PM, John Hudak wrote:
So, this causes me to ask the question: Why hasen't gattrib been
removed from:[3][2]http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gaf as
well as
any
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:01:07PM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 18:57 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
That is how I would like it to work. But clicking the swatch
also selects the layer, which is undesirable behavior. There
is no clean way to prevent this with a
Hi everyone,
My PCB+GL branches are now rebased against git HEAD, with all the
excellent work from Andrew Poelstra on the internal unit conversion to
nanometers.
Please test and let me know if you find any bugs. I've given it cursory
testing, but haven't actually used it much myself yet.
Best
On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 16:32 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
Yes, I found one -- and it is not actually that dirty. You can
intercept the button-press-event signal, use the function
gtk_tree_view_get_path_at_pos ()
to figure out what cell is clicked on, then prevent the propagation
of the
Thanks for all of your input, guys. I've done the fun parts
now (i.e., writing the widget) and still have to hook it into
the Gtk menu system. It looks like it won't be too hard, once
I understand everything that's going on in there.
I have a busy weekend, so I won't be posting anything you can
Not true with gattrib_csv. All 300 instances are grouped together
on one line if all their properties are the same. One edit and an
import and then all 300 have been updated. gattrib_csv scales very
nicely to large projects.
Would you be willing to share that code with my sch2csv/csv2sch
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 05:22:57PM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
Cool.
Here's a fun idea - had you considered using the tree view's _tree_
feature to show layer groups?
That might let us allow switching off entire layer groups, or individual
layers within them.
Oooh. I had not
Do we need any core changes to support any new functionality we've
decided on? I know people ask about making sug-group layers
separately controllable, and/or making narrower classes of objects
visible.
___
geda-user mailing list
I can't use Shift without making assumptions about what character
Shift+1 corresponds to on the user's keyboard. So that's out.
The lesstif hid traps the events before they're translated, so it can
do this.
___
geda-user mailing list
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:41:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Do we need any core changes to support any new functionality we've
decided on? I know people ask about making sug-group layers
separately controllable, and/or making narrower classes of objects
visible.
Not with the current
On 08/19/2011 12:18 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
My PCB+GL branches are now rebased against git HEAD, with all the
excellent work from Andrew Poelstra on the internal unit conversion to
nanometers.
Please test and let me know if you find any bugs. I've given it cursory
testing, but haven't actually
Not true with gattrib_csv. All 300 instances are grouped together
on one line if all their properties are the same. One edit and an
import and then all 300 have been updated. gattrib_csv scales very
nicely to large projects.
Would you be willing to share that code with my sch2csv/csv2sch
Pros/cons? and please, no philosphy about integrated vs independent
tools...I am interested in aspects such as what things work? what
doesn't? user experiences such as strengths and weakness (again
actual/functional and not philosophy)
Thanks
John
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:41:58PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
[...]
Though, I am still unsure how to indicate that the last 4
layers can't be used for drawing.
Put the item names in parenthesis.
--
There are some things in life worth obsessing over. Most
things aren't, and when you learn
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:44:12 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
d) While menues can be ripped off and used as a toolbox, they
don't remember their state beyond the end of the session. This
essentially prevents persistent user configuration of the GUI.
Actually, the GTK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave McGuire wrote:
If I may make a suggestion...For those of us who don't access the
repository regularly, and don't live and breathe git (I'm an SVN guy),
it might be helpful to put a quickie command line (or two) in these
sorts of
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:55:31 -0400
John Hudak jjhu...@gmail.com wrote:
Pros/cons? and please, no philosphy about integrated vs independent
tools...I am interested in aspects such as what things work? what
doesn't? user experiences such as strengths and weakness (again
actual/functional and
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:08:57 -0400
Dave McGuire mcgu...@neurotica.com wrote:
On 08/19/2011 12:18 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
My PCB+GL branches are now rebased against git HEAD, with all the
excellent work from Andrew Poelstra on the internal unit conversion
to nanometers.
Please test and
Same here, I remember some aspects were difficult to figure out, and
some basic features were lacking (didnt have copy/paste at the time but
it does now), but at the same time it had advanced features like 3d
models for parts. It would be nice if geda and kicad could read each
31 matches
Mail list logo
