One of my dream projects is to do a GUI for pcb that uses two or
more monitors, with one monitor heavy on the toolbars and showing an
overview thumber window, and the other monitor being 100% layout.
eh, one of the reasons I really like having two monitors is so I can
have reference
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 01:42 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
Even conversion of old legacy Altium designs could be done given access
^
Is this a serious restriction?
Would it be possible for a user of a current altium license to
Even conversion of old legacy Altium designs could be done given access
I expect there will be a growing demand for exit options for Altium
users once the full impact of their recent upheaval settles in. It
could benefit the gEDA community to adopt Altium refugees - they're
used to spending $4K
Andrew and Kai-Martin,
I've saved the broken (with wrong Q42) board using pcb+gl_experimantal.stgit
branch.
No problems with with pcb+gl, but I did not try to open broken file there.
Anyway I remember that there was a situation when one version (after some
moving/dragging components) showed
Matthew Lewis wrote:
but the change had no effect since the older m4
lib is being used when you import a schematic. You have to go back and
manually replace the footprints if you want newlib.
This is why I habitually move the m4 lib out of the way, so gnetlist
does not find it even if it
On Aug 23, 2011, at 8:45 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 08/22/2011 07:45 AM, Kovacs Levente wrote:
I open up a new schematic, place two instances of 7404-1, edit the
attributes of the second one, promote the slot attribute, edit the
newly-accessible one, change it to 2, save it, save the
$ pcb --version
PCB version 1.99z
$ git log -1
commit 87572b48e0d58b8f69d4aece6e22c4a5d89a16c5
Author: Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca
Date: Mon Aug 22 17:10:23 2011 -0700
Fix segfault in report.c text report output
I have a component with a pin that info shows copper width = 72
I want to
Hello All,
How does gschem handle cases of different gates in the same package?
For example, I am trying to create a symbol for On Semiconductor's
NTZD3155C complementary PMOS-NMOS MOSFET pair. Unlike the dual/quad
NAND/NOR gates in the gschem tutorials, this package contains two
dont ya love moderated lists? lol
on a more serious note, yes, a path from altium would be huge, but in
all honesty, having tools that work and inter-operate would be much
better. After playing with KiCAD for a bit, they have a very nice
integrated tool suite that all works...and
On 08/23/2011 08:47 PM, Matthew Lewis wrote:
I was double checking a pcb layout today and I discovered a rather
nasty gotcha. It seems that gschem and PCB don't agree on which end of
a diode should be pin 1. Gschem views pin 1 as the anode and PCB
considers pin 1 to be the cathode. It doesn't
On 08/24/2011 12:34 AM, Gus Fantanas wrote:
Hello All,
How does gschem handle cases of different gates in the same
package? For example, I am trying to create a symbol for On
Semiconductor's NTZD3155C complementary PMOS-NMOS MOSFET pair. Unlike
the dual/quad NAND/NOR gates in the gschem
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 05:14:43AM -0500, kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
$ pcb --version
PCB version 1.99z
$ git log -1
commit 87572b48e0d58b8f69d4aece6e22c4a5d89a16c5
Author: Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca
Date: Mon Aug 22 17:10:23 2011 -0700
Fix segfault in report.c text report
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
Indeed. The posts to the list that I woke up to this morning took a
frighteningly KiCad-centric turn.
Well, this is, because apparently one of the kicad developers showed up.
Is any of the geda devs going to
On Aug 24, 2011, at 5:21 AM, Ethan Swint wrote:
On 08/23/2011 08:47 PM, Matthew Lewis wrote:
I was double checking a pcb layout today and I discovered a rather nasty
gotcha. It seems that gschem and PCB don't agree on which end of a diode
should be pin 1. Gschem views pin 1 as the anode
eh, one of the reasons I really like having two monitors is so I can
I have four monitors (monitors are cheap!). layout on the main
monitor, menus and dialogs on the left, pdfs on the right, schematic
on the upper.
___
geda-user mailing list
No offense, but from all the stuff I've read from the gEDA base, various
blog postings, and freelance how-tos, a common topic that always seems to
come up is that with these tools and a knowledge of scripting languages, one
can do just about anything.
There are two camps here. One pushes
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:35 PM, DJ Delorie [1]d...@delorie.com wrote:
I wouldn't know how to tell PCB that it should look at several
schematics for the import action. Maybe, DJ can add a comment.
Layout-level Attributes:
import::src0 = file1.sch
import::src1 =
kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
I have a component with a pin that info shows copper width = 72
I want to set copper width to 70 so I go to File-Preferneces-Increments
and set Size Increment/Decrement to 1 and press OK
This feature is currently broken (and
Dave McGuire wrote:
You should promote the slot attribute for both instances.
Even though slot #1 defaults to 1?
In any event, I've tried all combinations, and I still get the same
behavior. This is with v1.6.2.20110115. This is repeatable here, using
symbol 7404-1 from the
Colin D Bennett wrote:
The lesstif tear-off model isn't so hot either. I've been considering
writing my own from scratch to work around some of the weirdisms.
I used the tear-offs for grid size when it worked, so I could quickly
switch back and forth between fine and coarse, imperial and
Peter Clifton wrote:
For converting legacy designs, an import from gerber might be more
generally useful to our user base, and doesn't require decyphering
unknown file formats. Admittedly this looses footprint information, but
perhaps that isn't always an issue.
Sometimes I would like to
On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:33 AM, Jared Casper wrote:
I chuckled at what this community would think of the comment, in
response to There are users who prefer separate dedicated
applications to an integrated design environment., BTW. How many of
these users have ever designed a PCB with more than
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:14:23 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 05:14:43AM -0500, kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
I have a component with a pin that info shows copper width = 72
I want to set copper width to 70 so I go to
File-Preferneces-Increments and set Size
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:21:17 -0400
Ethan Swint eswint.r...@verizon.net wrote:
On 08/23/2011 08:47 PM, Matthew Lewis wrote:
I was double checking a pcb layout today and I discovered a rather
nasty gotcha. It seems that gschem and PCB don't agree on which end
of a diode should be pin 1.
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:53:23 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I thought about that... making different footprints that don't
have copper on the component side of the pins. Since that would
require making new footprints for pretty much everything,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:42:26 +0100
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
For converting legacy designs, an import from gerber might be more
generally useful to our user base, and doesn't require decyphering
unknown file formats. Admittedly this looses footprint information,
but perhaps that
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:53 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
eh, one of the reasons I really like having two monitors is so I can
I have four monitors (monitors are cheap!). layout on the main
monitor, menus and dialogs on the left, pdfs on the right, schematic
on the upper.
More or less
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Colin D Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:14:23 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 05:14:43AM -0500, kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
I have a component with a pin that info shows copper width = 72
I want to set copper width to 70 so I go to
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:01 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
Unpacking the container format, separating out individual footprints
from a library, identifying most of the binary record types within those
footprints. It would take time and examples to verify we can know
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 22:14 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:01 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
Unpacking the container format, separating out individual footprints
from a library, identifying most of the binary record types within those
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 20:28 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:53 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
eh, one of the reasons I really like having two monitors is so I can
I have four monitors (monitors are cheap!). layout on the main
monitor, menus and dialogs on the left,
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:53 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
eh, one of the reasons I really like having two monitors is so I can
I have four monitors (monitors are cheap!). layout on the main
monitor, menus and dialogs on the left, pdfs on the right, schematic
on the upper.
A decent graphics
A decent graphics card capable of driving them is not though.. and it
needs to have working GL drivers under Linux too ;)
Two cheap dual-dvi nvidia cards is all it takes.
The problem is when you want a single desktop across two cards, then X
starts tripping over itself.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:31:23PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
I have a component with a pin that info shows copper width = 72
I want to set copper width to 70 so I go to File-Preferneces-Increments
and set Size Increment/Decrement to 1 and press OK
On 08/22/2011 11:29 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
The commercial package he wants to keep up with seems to be altium designer.
Oh, I guess that's why I referred his request to others. I like the
radical flexibility of gEDA tools without getting evangelical about it,
and KiCAD is closer to
35 matches
Mail list logo