On Monday 12 September 2011, Hannu Vuolasaho wrote:
Is it possible to do same thing? Input wav to simulator and
get speaker's output and hear it? I know it's not perfect
but it could be very helpful. Has someone done this before
and provide some hints, examples or links?
If you can do some
Hello Hannu,
I have a python module that can reads ngspice data and export arbitrary vector
to PWL source. I'm using it for quite long time.
If You have any questions then please let me know.
I remember that I was using it to auto optimize a circuit: run ngspice from
python, import it's data,
I've built a cygwin version of geda/gaf 1.6.2 and pcb and combined it,
rather crudely, with the necessary cygwin bits to make it easy
to install on a Windows PC. It's really intended for my students to
use,
but I've put it in [1]http://www.dur.ac.uk/peter.baxendale/stuff/gEDA/
in
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:54:26 -0700
From: russ.d...@asu.edu
To: geda-user@moria.seul.org
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Speaker SPICE modeling with gschem and ng-spice/gnucap
Here's the spice raw reader that jpd and Hannu are both missing out on:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:12:26 +0100
BAXENDALE P.R. peter.baxend...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
I've built a cygwin version of geda/gaf 1.6.2 and pcb and combined it,
rather crudely, with the necessary cygwin bits to make it easy
to install on a Windows PC. It's really intended for my students to use,
I've built a cygwin version of geda/gaf 1.6.2 and pcb and
combined it, rather crudely, with the necessary cygwin bits to
make it easy to install on a Windows PC.
Don't forget that you need to distribute the geda and cygwin sources
with your binaries. Yes, it's a pain, but yes, you
That's great! How coincidental that I just opened up my mail
client to post to the list about how I could not find a Windows
build of gEDA!
I want to recommend gEDA to colleagues and online contacts, but
unless I can point them to a one-click Windows download, gEDA won't
be considered --
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Colin D Bennett [1]co...@gibibit.com
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:12:26 +0100
BAXENDALE P.R. [2]peter.baxend...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
I've built a cygwin version of geda/gaf 1.6.2 and pcb and combined
it,
rather crudely, with the necessary
I want to recommend gEDA to colleagues and online contacts, but
unless I can point them to a one-click Windows download, gEDA won't
be considered -- it'll surely be KiCad or (grimace) EAGLE.
You didn't notice my posting last week about my nightly
geda-for-windows builds? Or that a big part
Unless something has change that I'm unaware of, the Windows build
of PCB does not print at all (you have to export PostScript to the
That hasn't changed, but Peter has cairo-printing patches in the
works.
nor does it handle the library paths correctly.
Seems to work OK for me.
I'll get
On Sep 13, 2011, at 9:00 AM, Dan Roganti wrote:
I noticed that the Mac is
also supported, but it's practically a given since it's basically uinx
underneath.
The difference between Windows and Mac here is that Charles Lepple has
routinely packaged new releases for Fink on MacOSX, while
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 06:30 -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
I want to recommend gEDA to colleagues and online contacts, but
unless I can point them to a one-click Windows download, gEDA won't
be considered -- it'll surely be KiCad or (grimace) EAGLE.
It's a one click download but remember its
Nobody has stepped forward to do this as a routine job for each new
release of gEDA on Windows.
Yes, I have. Peter and I have been working on the details, but I've
been doing automated builds of geda for windows for a while now. I
just haven't advertised them much because we're still testing
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 11:17 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Unless something has change that I'm unaware of, the Windows build
of PCB does not print at all (you have to export PostScript to the
That hasn't changed, but Peter has cairo-printing patches in the
works.
Specifically, I have a patch
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:42:12 -0400
DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
I've built a cygwin version of geda/gaf 1.6.2 and pcb and
combined it, rather crudely, with the necessary cygwin bits to
make it easy to install on a Windows PC.
Don't forget that you need to distribute the
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:44:21 -0400
DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
That's great! How coincidental that I just opened up my mail
client to post to the list about how I could not find a Windows
build of gEDA!
I want to recommend gEDA to colleagues and online contacts, but
unless
On Sep 13, 2011, at 9:53 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Nobody has stepped forward to do this as a routine job for each new
release of gEDA on Windows.
Yes, I have. Peter and I have been working on the details, but I've
been doing automated builds of geda for windows for a while now. I
just
So is mingw-based better so the user doesn't have a huge cygwin
installation in their c:\cygwin? It would be nice to have a more
self-contained install.
The PCB installer is only 9 MB but I haven't tried stripping out debug
information yet. The only other executable pcb needs is one to set
OK, so you and Peter intend to take on the additional burden of
routinely packaging for Windows?
The plan is to automate it so that there is no burden, aside from the
usual dealings with bug reports, but that's no more than what we do
for other platforms.
I think you misread the mailing
On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Colin D Bennett wrote:
How much Unix tools does gEDA really need
to run? Just the Scheme interpreter?
Optional tools need a variety of support, e.g. Perl for refdes_renum, Python
for tragesym. To participate in gedasymbols.org, you need CVS, and some of the
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:44 AM, DJ Delorie [1]d...@delorie.com wrote:
That's great! How coincidental that I just opened up my mail
client to post to the list about how I could not find a Windows
build of gEDA!
I want to recommend gEDA to colleagues and online contacts,
But I would think to look at the main site, www.gpleda.org, for any
kind of announcements
I know, and I've chosen not to make them *that* widely known yet.
We're planning a PCB release this weekend, hoping to have an official
windows installer for PCB at that point.
On other small thing, why
Don't forget that you need to distribute the geda and cygwin sources
with your binaries. Yes, it's a pain, but yes, you have to do it.
The gEDA sources are in the zip, but I forgot about the cygwin ones.
I'll take a look at how much time it would take to include them,
otherwise
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:43:46 -0600
John Doty j...@noqsi.com wrote:
On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Colin D Bennett wrote:
How much Unix tools does gEDA really need
to run? Just the Scheme interpreter?
Optional tools need a variety of support, e.g. Perl for refdes_renum, Python
for
Colin D Bennett wrote:
http://www.delorie.com/pcb/geda-windows/
Well, I wasn't looking for a Windows build at the moment when you
sent that message,
Note, that this build contains a potential show-stopper for PCB: At least
on winXP it fails to zoom. See
Geoff Swan wrote:
+1 I think it unlikely that a gEDA wiki would be targeted.
It is very likely to be targeted by semi clever spam bots. I administrate
a couple of wikis. Plain, anonymous write accesss had to be disabled because
they caught spam bots trying to distribute their spew after a few
Some hooks of gschem are hooked in by default in system-gschemrc. Most of
these are fine. But some don't mix well with my style of schematics (e.g.
autoplace-object-attributes)
Is there a way to unhook these short of editing system-gschemrc? I thought
about overloading with some kind of NOP
On Tue, September 13, 2011 1:54 pm, DJ Delorie wrote:
On other small thing, why are the links split across a couple of
websites for the same project ?
PCB, gEDA, and gerbv (etc) are not the same project.
I keep trying (in person even!) to explain that to Dan. ;)
If Dan can (repeatedly)
From: j...@noqsi.com
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:16:45 -0600
To: geda-user@moria.seul.org
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: cygwin geda tools
OK, so you and Peter intend to take on the additional burden of routinely
packaging for Windows? Above and beyond
Note, that this build contains a potential show-stopper for PCB: At least
on winXP it fails to zoom. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/843577
Might be worth retrying; since then we've bumped the gtk version.
Zoom works fine for me in Win7.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak
kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Some hooks of gschem are hooked in by default in system-gschemrc. Most of
these are fine. But some don't mix well with my style of schematics (e.g.
autoplace-object-attributes)
Is there a way to unhook these
Rubén Gómez Antolí wrote:
Webarchive has a copy at 13 Septembre, 2010. I hope it helps:
http://web.archive.org/web/20100913034623/http://anthonix.resnet.scms.waikato.ac.nz/toporouter/
Thanks.
Unfortunately, the site contains nothing about usage and parameters. However,
I found by trial and
Jared Casper wrote:
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Hook-Reference.html
Looks like there is a remove-hook! function, or just reset-hook! and
start over with what you want.
Thank you for the pointer! I tried reset-hook! and it did the job.
---)kaimartin(---
--
nor does it handle the library paths correctly.
Seems to work OK for me.
I just downloaded the 20110913 snap shot. Fired up PCB.
First thing I got was:
Windows cannot open this file: ListLibraryContents.sh.
Hardly the glowing introduction to a good Windows port.
'Cancel' that then go
First thing I got was:
I meant, if you open the library window, it's got the newlib parts in
there. I knew the m4 stuff wouldn't work, that's why we converted
everything. A few bugfixes in the converter and we can stop using m4
at runtime completely.
File - Preferences - Library - Add a
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:55 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
First thing I got was:
I meant, if you open the library window,
Aren't those two different issues?
File - Preferences - Library - Add a library path
then Restart program for changes to take effect.
This is how it works
Before a Windows Port takes up a prominent spot on any gEDA et.al.
Home Page these are the issue I know that need to be fixed:
Feel free to verify these and file bug reports for them. I'm pretty
sure I'll forget the details over time.
___
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:24:57 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Geoff Swan wrote:
+1 I think it unlikely that a gEDA wiki would be targeted.
It is very likely to be targeted by semi clever spam bots. I administrate
a couple of wikis. Plain, anonymous write accesss
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:36:25 +0100
BAXENDALE P.R. peter.baxend...@durham.ac.uk wrote:
Don't forget that you need to distribute the geda and cygwin
sources with your binaries. Yes, it's a pain, but yes, you
have to do it.
The gEDA sources are in the zip, but I forgot about the cygwin
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 22:53 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Seems like the toporouter would need more than just GUI integration and user
accessible parameters to become a viable option. :-|
Sure -- in one of the last postings the author told us, that one year
fulltime work ($50k) is
You don't have to put the sources in the same ZIP file as the
binary, do you? You can provide a source archive in the same
download directory, right next to the binary download.
Right, same directory (even just same server) is fine.
___
geda-user
41 matches
Mail list logo
