Hi all,
-Original Message-
From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
[mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Peter Clifton
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 12:16 AM
To: geda-user@moria.seul.org
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: help with pcb dsn plugin
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Bert Timmerman
bert.timmer...@xs4all.nl wrote:
PCB mostly has a consistent style, and we won't apply patches
which don't follow that.
This is the next patch on my todo list.
Is the above the exact syntax ?
No worries, I changed the style in the first place
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 01:25 -0700, Jared Casper wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Bert Timmerman
bert.timmer...@xs4all.nl wrote:
PCB mostly has a consistent style, and we won't apply patches
which don't follow that.
This is the next patch on my todo list.
Is the above the exact
The most obvious difference between the windows version of PCB and
the one built for linux is transparency. Why is this so? If I read
the opengl description correctly, all windows versions should be
able to deal with opengl commands even if a driver for hardware
acceleration is missing. And of
Happy Birthday to Linux, 20 years old today. (9/17)
--
Darryl Gibson N2DIY
Linux, free software, for the people, by the people.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Peter Clifton wrote:
PCB mostly has a consistent style, and we won't apply patches which
don't follow that.
Two space indents,
if (test)
{
statements (like, this);
}
else
{
even_if_they_ARE_horrid ();
}
Can the style conventions be found anywhere in a halfway comprehensive
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
provides accelerated drivers for windows.
Wouldn't openGL just work in such an environment?
GLEW is typically used:
http://glew.sourceforge.net/
You can find an example of its usage in the Toped project:
Can the style conventions be found anywhere in a halfway comprehensive
written form?
http://astyle.sourceforge.net/
Better would be to write a AStyle configuration file, that matches the
standard style of the code, that could then be applied to
the code so all of it is completely
Hi, congrats too,
-Original Message-
From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
[mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Darryl Gibson
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 8:45 PM
To: gEDA user mailing list
Subject: gEDA-user: Happy 20th
Happy Birthday to Linux, 20
Is the above the exact syntax ?
PCB follows the GNU coding standards, Run the source through indent
and it should come out correct.
The only exception, usually, is comments (since we build docs from
them) and table-formatted structure data, since GNU style creates much
more whitespace than we
The most obvious difference between the windows version of PCB and
the one built for linux is transparency. Why is this so?
We couldn't get it working correctly in time.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
Can the style conventions be found anywhere in a halfway comprehensive
written form?
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Just for the record, I don't like PCB's code formatting style myself
either ;)
I assume there are PCB devs that prefer the gnu style? Or is it only
enforced to be consistent with all the legacy code?
Jared
I assume there are PCB devs that prefer the gnu style?
1. I prefer GNU style. Emacs automatically does this style when
coding, too.
2. GNU style seems to be popular elsewhere too, which reduces the
learning curve for many new developers
3. Historically, that's what we've used.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:46 AM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote:
I assume there are PCB devs that prefer the gnu style?
1. I prefer GNU style. Emacs automatically does this style when
coding, too.
Good enough. Note that Emacs automatically does whatever style you
tell it to,
DJ Delorie wrote:
The most obvious difference between the windows version of PCB and
the one built for linux is transparency. Why is this so?
We couldn't get it working correctly in time.
Is there a serious road block?
Can I tell potential users that this will most likely be rectified
on
DJ Delorie wrote:
Is the above the exact syntax ?
PCB follows the GNU coding standards,
(.. snip ..)
The only exception, usually, is comments
Is this also true for the c portion of gschem, gnetlist, gerbvierw, etc. ?
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak, Email: k...@familieknaak.de
On 09/18/2011 11:04 PM, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
Well, C itself doesn't seem to be used too much outside of 10 year
old code. Nowadays the language du jour seems to be Python, and C is
only used for library-type projects that want many language bindings.
For web apps and other trendy stuff,
Is there a serious road block?
Yes - the code just doesn't work. The PCB window is very messed up,
including no menus or sidebar and a misaligned crosshair.
Can I tell potential users that this will most likely be rectified
on a reasonable time frame -- Say in, in a few months?
PCB 20110918 has been Released! Many thanks to everyone who put
effort into this release, from the huge new feature sets to the
tiniest doc fixes, every little bit helps! This release saw about
three times the number of commits over the previous two releases, and
many first-time contributors
Just got fooled by the classic solder/component vs top/bottom, again.
It just won't stick with me, that solder is supposed to be a synonym
to top. I addressed the issue before about a year ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/31354/focus=31356
Consensus seemed to be that
It just won't stick with me, that solder is supposed to be a
synonym to top.
Good, because solder is a synonym for bottom. ;-)
Still unhappy with moderation of geda-user.
Why? Because it is completely intransparent.
Please do not mix your political agenda with technical questions.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:24:51AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Just got fooled by the classic solder/component vs top/bottom, again.
It just won't stick with me, that solder is supposed to be a synonym
to top. I addressed the issue before about a year ago:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:47:36PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Still unhappy with moderation of geda-user.
Why? Because it is completely intransparent.
Please do not mix your political agenda with technical questions.
In Kai's defense, his message was in his signature, which
is clearly
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 01:24:51 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak k...@familieknaak.de wrote:
Just got fooled by the classic solder/component vs top/bottom, again.
It just won't stick with me, that solder is supposed to be a synonym
to top.
DJ's clarification aside, I would vote for top/bottom, with each
On 09/18/2011 07:56 PM, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
DJ's clarification aside, I would vote for top/bottom, with each of those
symbolically being placed in the list. That is, for an 8-layer default: Top, Layer 2,
Layer 3, ..., Layer 7, Bottom
+1
JG
On 09/18/2011 10:04 PM, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
Well, C itself doesn't seem to be used too much outside of 10 year
old code. Nowadays the language du jour seems to be Python, and C is
only used for library-type projects that want many language bindings.
IMHO everything should be Lisp.;)
:-)
JG
DJ's clarification aside, I would vote for top/bottom, with each
of those symbolically being placed in the list. That is, for an
8-layer default: Top, Layer 2, Layer 3, ..., Layer 7, Bottom
+1
You're +1'ing something we already have, and not what Kai was taking
about. From the user's
On 09/18/2011 08:16 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
You're +1'ing something we already have,
Whoops.
On 09/18/2011 08:16 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
So... go get the release and test it
OK. There's another unfinished/overdue project on my to do list...
I will attempt to swap sleep/insomnia for executing
DJ Delorie wrote:
From the user's point of view, we use top/bottom [hopefully]
consistently.
There are at least three places in the GTK-GUI that still expose
solder/component:
a) The first item on the left in the status line, which gives a
hint on the side the canvas shows. (patch
On 09/18/2011 09:01 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
This patch replaces component and solder in the leftmost item of the
status line of the GTK HID with top and bottom.
Thanks for work to improve the GUI Kai-Martin.
JG
___
geda-user mailing list
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
b) The names of the copper groups in
File - Preferences - Groups
c) The help text in
File - Preferences - Info
patch atttached for the preference dialog
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak, Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Hello All,
After many years (10+) of hosting the user mailing list at SEUL, the
time has come for the user list to find a new home.
DJ has graciously volunteered to host two new gEDA mailing lists on
his server:
1) A new list called: geda-help
The geda-help mailing list is for people
33 matches
Mail list logo
