very sexy
web-2.0 AJAX goodness there ;)
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 02:23 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Hi guys,
Recall there was some chat about git backed wiki software? I came across
this one today:
https://github.com/github/gollum
Also, see:
https://github.com/blog/774-git-powered-wikis-improved
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical
paths, and as you suggest - we ought to introduce some user control over
the z-order.
(Goes to file a feature request about that now).
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 13:03 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 10:00 +0900, John Doty wrote:
(Goes to file a feature request about that now).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/geda/+bug/704407
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University
into the pcb checkout you made, and type:
git rev-parse HEAD
Please past\e the returned string, so I know exactly what version you're
trying with.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44
That is a good idea indeed. Could you file a feature request for it
please?
https://launchpad.net/pcb/+filebug
I would have called it spatial-merge ;)
John
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
this was the latest development
version which was failing for you.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone
run doesn't segfault, but I can reproduce the fact that
something odd is going on. I'll get back to you if I discover any
short-term fix.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729
wish, I could try to reconstruct your design in a way which
doesn't break PCB. I also need to file the minimal test-case in order to
solve the underlying bug. (PCB should never segfault).
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ
.
3. Possibly some warning function to note the mistake when loading a PCB
with bad clearances.
4. Longer term - do we need to revisit the maths used to create thermal
shapes? How do we fix this without risking breaking old designs?
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering
-b pcb+gl git://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
More likely to have bugs, but faster:
git clone -b pcb+gl_experimental git://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
NB: It doesn't crash, but it doesn't render correctly either. You still
need to fix the clearances in your design.
--
Peter Clifton
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:56 -0500, George M. Gallant, Jr. wrote:
See the attached screenshot.
Mailing list has scrapped the attachment I think.
I don't think there is a better technique for now. Perhaps you could
explain what the polygons are to be used for?
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:31 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
A fix for this belongs:
1. In src/thermal.c (to avoid producing BROKEN polygons)
Actually, it seems ArcPoly () is also producing bad polygons for small
angles. (As well as thermal.c asking it to produce some negative sweep
arc segments
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 10:35 -0800, Colin D Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:10:11 +
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:49 -0500, George M. Gallant, Jr. wrote:
What is required to run the OpenGL port?
Just a working (and not ancient) OpenGL driver
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:15 -0500, George M. Gallant, Jr. wrote:
On 01/18/2011 01:13 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:56 -0500, George M. Gallant, Jr. wrote:
See the attached screenshot.
Mailing list has scrapped the attachment I think.
I don't think there is a better
(if there is
such a thing) calculation to determine a thermal shape for a given pin
or via?
I've attached my work in progress.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 01:42 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
It is intended that these will be published in Altium format as that
is the CAD package of choice for the design process.
Why not geda in the first place?
I've mentioned some reasons in other emails - I'll
is, but I thought John was talking about one of the Balloon
developers.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab
The designers already bought Altium at some point
Existing symbols / schematics which can be reused
Production tested and optimised footprints
Belief more than logic seems to be what moves people to choose proprietary
over open tools.
That is probably true.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering
- PCB designs are more like deployed web-software.. very linear in
their development, and diverging branches don't make a lot of sense.
PCBs are of course harder, as it becomes harder to partition and
segregate areas of conflict so individual changes could be reverted.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical
- PCB designs are more like deployed web-software.. very linear in
their development, and diverging branches don't make a lot of sense.
PCBs are of course harder, as it becomes harder to partition and
segregate areas of conflict so individual changes could be reverted.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical
Sorry, I sent this twice.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
could
insert new objects mid way into a list. I'm not sure which (if any)
edits cause PCB to create a new object though.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal
, John Doty wrote:
On Jan 15, 2011, at 1:42 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
I want to see all connectivity code move into libgeda, and
flattening be optional.
Connectivity is precisely the kind of thing that should not be in
libgeda.
I (and all other gEDA developers I've talked to) disagree
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 21:29 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
What about extracting the topology of the tracks (probably using /
refactoring some code from the topological auto-router).
Isn't this what gnetlist does?
No - we are talking cross purposes I think. gnetlist
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 08:03 -0800, Colin D Bennett wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 08:47:19 +
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Are there any use-cases for invisible text which is not an attribute?
Since it might exist already though - we MAY have to add an:
Invisble [x] option
/+filebug
Which does not report as you quoted below. It is possible someone has
fixed before I looked though.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 17:24 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 09:32 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
I wanted to submit a patch to PCB.
Launchpad tells me to use the Source Forge tracker, which can't be
found on Source Forge anymore:
Send me the link to the page which says
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 11:44 -0600, John Griessen wrote:
On 01/16/2011 11:32 AM, John Griessen wrote:
So I don't see how that was a stopper, even without Bill's specific Altium
experience.
I meant Bob's
I'm lost.. who is Bob?
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 00:22 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
Ok, I found the quote - it was in our tips for filing bugs. (gEDA and
PCB)
Doh. I thought I had sifted through all the instances of sourceforge in
the geda-wiki.
Indeed.. this was on our LP page! (From
.
Not done. Would be nice though - but I'd rate it of similar complexity
to a board auto-router. (Not as rigidly constrained topologically, but
to do well would require a decent auto-place, and a decent auto-router -
even if the rules are different to that used with a PCB).
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical
as an
attribute.. change the attribute visibility, then edit it with an
explicit ex (edit text), to change it back.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal
/Hide invisible text That is the one which
does as you suggest.
It is the option which _changes_ visibility we wish to kill.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173
.
There was no proposal to remove the ability to hide attributes, just the
magic break my schematic button which makes every hidden attribute
visible in a way which is not trivial to undo.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 13:10 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
What are the use-cases?
IMO, only viewing of synthesis results, or matching up / creating a
schematic which matches an extracted netlist - either from reverse
engineering, layout extraction, or from another program.
--
Peter Clifton
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 09:10 -0600, John Griessen wrote:
On 01/15/2011 06:59 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
Yes, please!
+1
Consider it napalmed.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel
) if you find any
API which is lacking.
then another language plugin for the PCB format.
I don't see how the two are congruent. Did you mean for extracting
layout for simulation?
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue
http://balloonboard.org/mailman/listinfo/balloon
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
as a whole.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
... - PS (or PNG etc..)
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
here.. so if /
when anyone files bugs for these requests, remember to find gerbv at
sourceforge.net/projects/gerbv
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal
made to an existing design.
Make the layers XOR logically but not the colors.
i.e. old layer red, new layer green, deleted portions would show up
in red, new portions would be green.
Excellent idea.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 12:39 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
The short answer is html + make
This should be easy to convert to
dokuwiki + make
After all, dokuwiki content is just a set of ascii files. The make file would
only be needed to distribute the files
://launchpad.net/pcb/+filebug
For gerbv, you'll have to brave SourceForge:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=addgroup_id=33921atid=409538
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729
can push html pages and other content to the git
repository though.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 21:19 -0500, Rick wrote:
On 1/10/2011 6:39 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
I don't mind dealing with SourceForge, but I want to be sure that what I
am reporting is considered a bug. When I use gerbv under Windows Vista
the image on the screen is grainy and any features
git natively, Canonical use, develop, love, and
generally adore bzr, and I got the feeling native git support for
Launchpad was not only not on their TODO list.. but that they would
probably not want it even if someone wrote the patch. (Patch being a
euphemism for quite a lot of code).
--
Peter
/geda/+bug/sf-1800913
Or shorter.. since you don't have to explicitly specify the project:
https://launchpad.net/bugs/698670
https://launchpad.net/bugs/sf-1800913
---)kaimartin(---
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson
, and also reassured me that it was ok to make those changes
membership unlocked.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328
for PCB, and removed the
forced line-wrap on both.
Better?
At some point I'd love to see the PCB pages revamped wholesale to
improve their impact and visual appeal. Whatever ends up being done, I'd
like the whole gpleda.org site to look consistent.
---)kaimartin(---
--
Peter Clifton
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 20:07 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
For full triage you have to be a member of the bug team (geda-bugs, or
pcb-bugs). Else, you get no edit buttons next to the importance button.
I'd expect, that this is configurable and the status can also
, the interesting statistic is more:
TOP OS *
Windows
79% of downloaders
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files//stats/os?dates=2003-02-11%20to%202011-01-10
I wonder how many of those downloaders actually use it.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 02:18 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
Over the years, the download count integrated to an astonishing 150.000
Look at the source downloads for the latest release though:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pcb/files/pcb/pcb-20100929/pcb-20100929.tar.gz
=pcbhtdocs.git;a=blob;f=Makefile
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
Just to make people aware, it is possible to do bug management on
Launchpad via email - if that suits you better.
See:
https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface
Note that it requires you to GPG sign your messages in order to prove
who you are.
Best wishes,
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical
.
It seems there is no need to confirm that someone wishes something ;)
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab
to update status of bugs as we
commit related code. See:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/700413
and our mindless helper:
https://launchpad.net/~gpleda-launchpad-robot
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue
fixed it.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
work.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 22:15 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Hi,
Kai-Martin has rightly pointed out that by default, users don't have
access to set certain flags on bugs - such as priority. This comes in
handy if you know you're submitting a feature-request (which by default,
should
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 22:59 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 22:15 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Hi,
Kai-Martin has rightly pointed out that by default, users don't have
access to set certain flags on bugs - such as priority. This comes in
handy if you know you're
=field.has_patch.used=field.has_branches.used=field.has_branches=onfield.has_no_branches.used=field.has_no_branches=onsearch=Search
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173
into the stable branch as
well.
so - in short, origin/master.
PS: Any Peter A. around :-?
I'm just heading to bed, and IIRC from IRC, so was Peter B.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel
tracker they came from - rather than what their contents
represent.
We could consider adding the feature-request tag to them as well (for
the contents). It would probably just require a bit of launchpad lib
scripting.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 06:38 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Set the priority to wish-list, that should do it. I have no problem
with the new tag in addition though, as it should help us find things
which are deliberately thought to be feature requests by the importer
review process, and lets us bisect / revert
parts of changes which cause problems.
If you already have the code in one big patch which is difficult to
split up, we could probably just commit it all as a single commit:
Improvements to the Multi-attribute editor (THIS TIME!)
Best wishes,
--
Peter
patches I had
outstanding for gEDA are pretty stagnant.)
[snip]
(Yes, Peter B and I are friends, so I'm biased - but I think this all
bore saying.)
I think we can all be friends. Disagreement does not imply malice.
Well said ;)
(And I forgive Peter B for being an emacs user ;))
--
Peter
.
status 3. - status 1. (I THINK!)
status 4. - status 1. (I THINK!)
I would just let the user rely on the normal undo mech. if they screw
something up in a way they didn't intend.
Good luck!
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering
just do this on my local instance)
Ask the LP admins to do the import for real
Open the LP trackers for use
Publicise change
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel
of my refactoring coordinate trasforms prior to landing
the PCB+GL branch).
Best wishes,
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223
gEDA development has / had otherwise completely stagnated.
(Yes, Peter B and I are friends, so I'm biased - but I think this all
bore saying.)
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0
.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
= Automatic (for design current density)
Track_width = Automatic (based on net class)
Track_width = 20mil
Track_width = 30mil
...
...
All ideas.. I'm not coding anything on this in the foreseeable future ;)
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge
to be equal to one
screen pixel at a given zoom level.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
-cut.
Mirrored is also a possibility. ei.
You should be able to get it back to a sane state where the text anchor
placement matches the description in the edit box.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
on the copper layers being routed.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 12:07 +0100, kai-martin knaak wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
I've got something for
people to PLAY WITH!:
https://bugs.staging.launchpad.net/pcb
https://bugs.staging.launchpad.net/geda
Is it possible to have new launchpad bugs sent to
gmane.comp.cad.geda.bugs
.
Just a guess.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
, the preset resistor looks somehow cramped compared to the nicely
proportioned resistors. I think they are the same size though. Perhaps
both need lengthening a tiny bit.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue
WILL BE LOST.
Best wishes,
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
we get moving bug trackers sorted.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
like to see PCB support this kind of thing
specified more generally than kludging by overlapping drill holes.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab
. (Otherwise it
becomes very difficult to track progress in fixing issues).
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared
was actually necessary to flush out connections from the
current net, before moving onto the next net in the netlist.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 16:37 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
Peter Laurich peter.laur...@akamina.com writes:
Has anyone else seen this problem?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3137324group_id=73743atid=538811
Hmm, I can't reproduce that with git HEAD.. any ideas?
--
Peter Clifton
/pcb.git
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:42 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 16:09 -0500, Peter Laurich wrote:
Has anyone else seen this problem?
More importantly, any idea what I am doing incorrectly?
No, and probably nothing...
Any chance you could try a git checkout and test
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 01:10 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 00:42 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 16:09 -0500, Peter Laurich wrote:
Has anyone else seen this problem?
More importantly, any idea what I am doing incorrectly?
No, and probably
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 17:03 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
I've used Cesar Strauss' minipack tools to build it before. This isn't
particularly maintained, but the latest gEDA version is packaged up here
for testing:
http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda-windows.html
WARNING::
A colleague
...
I'll ask, but I don't think that was the problem from what he said.
Thanks!
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328
for Wx was broken... they missed passing a
configuration variable to the appropriate widget constructor to setup
the GL context properly.
That tended to result in segfault for some GL drivers.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ
wipe the existing
contents!
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me
+gl_experimental.
For me, my biggest bugbear with stock PCB was the lack of layer
translucency, and slow rendering.. so I did this:
http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d-6.png
http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d-2.png
Best wishes,
--
Peter Clifton
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 11:15 +0100, Stefan Tauner wrote:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:43:19 +
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
http://pcjc2.blogspot.com/2010/12/geda-development.html
I hate SourceForge - Ok, that one was just me!
no you are not!
slow, paralyzing, unusable
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:31 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
ps: Comments on this blog are restricted to team members.
not really in favor of crowd-sourcing spirit ;)
I'm not sure when I set that - and team members seems odd.
I've switched comments on for OpenID authenticated users.
--
Peter
tools to build it before. This isn't
particularly maintained, but the latest gEDA version is packaged up here
for testing:
http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda-windows.html
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue
and put it on the main page to download
section(with some neat warning).
I am interested in the build process? Peter, how have you build
this?
mingw32 + Cesar Strauss's minipack build system. (Which comes with
recipes for gEDA)
git://repo.or.cz/minipack.git
--
Peter Clifton
presume on a Linux desktop. Anyway, if you have problems let us (or
me) know, I'm always keen to hear of success stories with gEDA / PCB
being used commercially, so I hope I can help make that happen.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9
.blogspot.com/2010/12/long-time-no-post.html
http://pcjc2.blogspot.com/2010/12/geda-development.html
http://pcjc2.blogspot.com/2010/12/pcbgl.html
No posts in over two years.. then three in one night.
Best wishes,
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University
this for an example:
https://code.launchpad.net/~pcjc2/notify-osd/fix_dropshadow/+merge/42804
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
Tel: +44 (0
301 - 400 of 2064 matches
Mail list logo