Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-23 Thread Armin Faltl
Hi, I compiled the latest version of FreeCAD and OpenCASCADE on my machine (with NVidia 8600 195.36.15, Debian 5.0.6). The compile worked reasonable and FreeCAD starts, but when I try to model something, e.g. cut a sphere out of a cube or chamfer and fillet the cube the screen-output is rubbish.

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-22 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Matthew Wilkins wrote: 1. make FreeCAD 3D models for each of the components 2. generate an XY place file, board outline file and drill file in PCB 3. run a python script in FreeCAD that generates a model of the board based on the outline gerber file. Make holes using data from the

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-21 Thread Dave McGuire
On 11/19/10 12:21 PM, Peter Clifton wrote: http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d_packages_mockup3.png http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d_packages_mockup4.png Perhaps pixel shaders and bump mapping is a little overkill for a few resistors, but it has

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-21 Thread John Griessen
On 11/21/2010 11:49 AM, Dave McGuire wrote: Perhaps pixel shaders and bump mapping is a little overkill for a few resistors, but it has kept me amused for a while. Looks fab! Will actually be useful. Why not have processors churn for us? Overkill? There are so many ways to kill the problem

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-21 Thread kai-martin knaak
John Griessen wrote: How could one have overkill? Inefficient use of developer cycles. Traditionally, the most valuable resource open source projects. ---)kaimartin(--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x6C0B9F53

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-21 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 22:45 +0100, kai-martin knaak wrote: John Griessen wrote: How could one have overkill? Inefficient use of developer cycles. Traditionally, the most valuable resource open source projects. Developers having fun are happy developers, and might even find time for some

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-21 Thread Matthew Wilkins
, right in a 3D CAD program that can be used to model enclosures and other parts. - Original Message From: John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com To: gEDA user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org Sent: Sun, November 21, 2010 1:29:38 PM Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn On 11/21

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-20 Thread Vanessa Ezekowitz
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:24:56 +0900 timecop time...@gmail.com wrote: 3D renderings of through-hole components is great and all, but this IS 2010, anyone still using through-hole stuff can just use Fritzing or something. How about adding relevant features to PCB, like boolean operations on

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-20 Thread Armin Faltl
kai-martin knaak wrote: I am playing with writing a VRML importer - which should be able to read files exported by Wings32 (like KiCad), but I can't for the life of me figure out how to drive Wings32 to create a new model! I'd strongly prefer to do 3D models with a full fledged 3D CAD

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-20 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 03:58 -0600, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote: Whether an external tool would do the job or not, apparently you are unaware of the immense quantity of through-hole components in use today, right now, in mass-production modern-day devices. Power supplies and audio equipment make

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-20 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 10:59 +0100, Armin Faltl wrote: You might have a look at http://gts.sourceforge.net/ . PCB already uses that for the topological auto-router ;) I had a thought in the back of my mind that it might also be useful for rendering models, but I've not got that far yet. I've

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-19 Thread Richard Barlow
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:21 +, Peter Clifton wrote: http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d_packages_mockup3.png http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d_packages_mockup4.png Wow, they look amazing! Perhaps pixel shaders and bump mapping is a little

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-19 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:30 +, Richard Barlow wrote: On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:21 +, Peter Clifton wrote: http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d_packages_mockup3.png http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d_packages_mockup4.png Wow, they look

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-19 Thread kai-martin knaak
Peter Clifton wrote: I'm sure one day we'll be able to export the whole thing to a format which can be used in blender for those times you need super realistic renderings ;) VRML is already such a format :-) I wish I knew blender This close-up of a laser diode package shows what blender

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-19 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 02:39 +0100, kai-martin knaak wrote: Did I mention, that mesh formats are a one way road, when it comes to construction? (Please tell me, that I don't need to make that point over and over again ;-) Got it ;) -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division,

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-19 Thread kai-martin knaak
Peter Clifton wrote: when PCB+GL+3D lands and users start creating models). ^ I'd love to see PCB+GL enter the main repo rather than wait until 3D is mature enough, too. ---)kaimartin( -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-19 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 03:00 +0100, kai-martin knaak wrote: Peter Clifton wrote: when PCB+GL+3D lands and users start creating models). ^ I'd love to see PCB+GL enter the main repo rather than wait until 3D is mature enough, too. I've been slowly tinkering with

Re: gEDA-user: PCB+GL resistor p0rn

2010-11-19 Thread timecop
3D renderings of through-hole components is great and all, but this IS 2010, anyone still using through-hole stuff can just use Fritzing or something. How about adding relevant features to PCB, like boolean operations on copper pours that aren't a hack or ... hey, who am I kidding. -tc On Sat,