Before this deteriorates into a my software is better than your
software contest, can I suggest that we try to keep things on-topic?
An excellent suggestion.
Peter :-(
--
Peter Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey Space Centre
Negotiating with IEEE is a good idea. ...
but I'd ask them to put links to our website, or give them lectures about the
project.
I think working with the IEEE is a good idea.
...
I am the chair of the IEEE consultants network in Washington, DC.
I apologise for being flippant in my previous
Andrew,
Thanks for the reply. It is a bit hard to read
here because all the lines are run
together. Kaimartin has indicated this is
because of using transfer encoding base64. Any
chance you can resend this in a different format?
Rick
At 03:48 AM 12/15/2010, you wrote:
Negotiating
Thanks for the reply. It is a bit hard to read here because all the lines
are run together. Kaimartin has indicated this is because of using transfer
encoding base64. Any chance you can resend this in a different format?
Funny you mention that, this email reads perfectly fine in my
At 10:12 AM 12/15/2010, you wrote:
I'm not sure about the 'base64' stuff, this is
google's 'rich text format'Â some people prefer
plain text on the mailing list so I've sent this straight to you.
Hope its a bit easier to read.
Thanks for the reply. I'm not clear on what you
did
On Wednesday 15 December 2010, timecop wrote:
Funny you mention that, this email reads perfectly fine in my
closed-source email reader.
Of course it does. You are using the same closed-source email
reader as Andrew does. Now, how about a different closed-source
email reader, like the one
al davis ad...@freeelectron.net wrote:
Base64 is a published standard that should be
universally supported.
... by way of standard open source mailing list managers detecting and
automatically rejecting posts encoded in base64.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
MS
On Wednesday 15 December 2010, Michael Sokolov wrote:
... by way of standard open source mailing list managers
detecting and automatically rejecting posts encoded in
base64.
Just because Eudora on Windows can't cope with it?
___
geda-user mailing
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:02:15 +
andrew whyte ajwh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I realise that I am joining a very established thread, but I'd like
to put forward 2 cents worth. Please don't be offended if what I'm
saying isn't the same as your opinion. I have used gEDA as the main
Anthony Blake wrote:
We already have a decent footprint/symbol library..
Ermm, no. We don't have decent libraries. What we have, is two sets of
inconsistent, incomplete libraries plus an orderless bunch of user
contributions in gedasymbols.org. The default symbols refuse to give a
clue what
At 04:30 AM 12/14/2010, Kovacs Levente wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:02:15 +
andrew whyte ajwh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
..snip..
Because of the GERBER standard, FOSS stands a chance of creating
competitive tools for EDA, this is much more difficult in areas where
open
Hi Everyone,
I realise that I am joining a very established thread, but I'd like
to put forward 2 cents worth. Please don't be offended if what I'm
saying isn't the same as your opinion. I have used gEDA as the main
(but not only) tool for EDA in my company for two and a half years, I
don't
Another option, that may not be acceptable to all, is that in the UK
RS Farnell both recently acquired small PCB development
companies(DesignSpark eagle respectively). The intention being the
companies adopt the free tool which integrates easily with their
catalogue and then buy more from
On 12/13/2010 08:23 PM, timecop wrote:
Another option, that may not be acceptable to all, is that in the UK
RS Farnell both recently acquired small PCB development
companies(DesignSpark eagle respectively). The intention being the
companies adopt the free tool which integrates easily with
Why do you bother to subscribe to this list? Its obvious that $0.02 is
worth more than your opinions.
Why do you bother replying?
Is it to show you agree or disagree?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:23 PM, timecop time...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway tl;dr version: RS sucks, DesignSpark sucks, Eagle sucks, buying
a EDA suite to pimp to your customers as the only benefit of your
shitty stock/price practice = stupid.
Also any designer too lazy to make
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Justyn Butler
justynbutler+g...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 10 December 2010 00:09, Stephen Ecob
silicon.on.inspirat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
How about a Kickstarter project for the toporouter? Let Anthony
On 12/12/2010 01:20 PM, Anthony Blake wrote:
If I do it, I think I should aim for a full years worth of funding,
which would be at least 50k. Three months is too short. What do you
guys think?
I have plans to use it for my low budget launches of open hardware products,
so I've looked at it
On 10 December 2010 00:09, Stephen Ecob
silicon.on.inspirat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
How about a Kickstarter project for the toporouter? Let Anthony make
a proposal and put it on www.kickstarter.com, and then gEDA users can
pledge
On 12/09/2010 05:03 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote:
Thanks Robert, it's good to know I'm not the only one !
Stephen
I've contribute tip money to gEDA tools and will again, and am working on
business
that will support more than tip money.
John Griessen
--
Ecosensory Austin TX
On 12/09/2010 06:09 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote:
how much funding would you need to get the toporouter working well
That's always a tough question to answer...
Unless it is for a limited feature, how do you define well?.
A good question of Anthony is, How much time would it take to reorganize
Hello all,
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 21:55 +1100, Stephen Ecob wrote:
I'm aiming to finish University in a few months.. if people would
like to fund work on the toporouter, then I would be pretty keen to
work on it full time.
Regards,
Anthony
Good, we've established that money could
How about a Kickstarter project for the toporouter? Let Anthony make
a proposal and put it on www.kickstarter.com, and then gEDA users can
pledge donations. If it raises enough money by graduation (or
whatever other deadline), then we all fund Anthony to work on it. If
we don't raise enough,
Peter Clifton wrote:
It wouldn't take many people willing to contribute £2 per month (say),
to fund a server, but getting infrastructure set up to make this kind of
donation would be a pain.
There is chipin.com
ChipIn does not charge any fees to organizers and contributors of events
that
I find adverts generally annoying.
That's fair enough.
There are better alternatives than advertisements to get the website
funded.
Yes and no. I'm certainly willing to chip in, and so is my company.
However, one-time contributions are things need to be negotiated or
processed on a
Popup ads and ads intermixed with gEDA content would
be distracting but I don't believe that is what is
being suggested.
A sidebar of text ads does not seem bad.
Occasionally useful and easy to ignore.
(* jcl *)
--
You can't create open hardware with closed EDA tools.
twitter:
26 matches
Mail list logo
