- back-annotation to schematic from the PCB editor.
An example of where this is essential is if impedance controlled nets
end up having to cross plane breaks and extra capacitors have to be
added to couple the ground return paths between the planes.
A net in the schematic may have an impedance
On Sep 2, 2011, at 9:36 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Besides, I always thought geda/pcb's competition was Eagle, not the
real high-end EDA tools. There are a *lot* of features we don't have,
that are hard to come by, that the high end tools have.
I came to gEDA from Viewlogic, which I used to
Steven Michalske wrote:
+1 to bundling plugins with pcb sources..
+1 to merging plug-ins into the main project. There is no point in keeping
useful features outside. The necessity to compile and keep distinct plugins
for different versions of PCB is a pain. Also, they tend to bit-rot and
2011/9/6 Kai-Martin Knaak kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de:
Steven Michalske wrote:
+1 to bundling plugins with pcb sources..
+1 to merging plug-ins into the main project. There is no point in keeping
useful features outside. The necessity to compile and keep distinct plugins
for different
Does the category low end bother you?
Original Message
Subject: Re: [OH Updates] How can you help solve the proprietary tool problem?
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:12:20 +1000
From: Dave Jones d...@eevblog.com
CC: upda...@lists.openhardwaresummit.org
I'm planning a review of the
Does the category low end bother you?
Nope. Dave comes from Altium so everything is relative to that ;-)
Besides, I always thought geda/pcb's competition was Eagle, not the
real high-end EDA tools. There are a *lot* of features we don't have,
that are hard to come by, that the high end tools
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 18:08 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 11:36 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Does the category low end bother you?
Nope. Dave comes from Altium so everything is relative to that ;-)
Besides, I always thought geda/pcb's competition was Eagle,
And
Just for the record, I'm not sure what our moderation policy is. Are any
of your posts being rejected by moderation? (If so - just what kind of
emails are you sending? ;)).
One of the things that changed when the list went moderated, is that I
no longer see my own posts, so I really never know
I rarely see my own posts, I turned on post acks.
On Sep 2, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Bob Paddock graceindustr...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for the record, I'm not sure what our moderation policy is. Are any
of your posts being rejected by moderation? (If so - just what kind of
emails are you
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 03:45:57PM -0400, Bob Paddock wrote:
Just for the record, I'm not sure what our moderation policy is. Are any
of your posts being rejected by moderation? (If so - just what kind of
emails are you sending? ;)).
One of the things that changed when the list went
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:10:10PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
I see it sometimes, but with other people's messages as often as mine.
For example, Peter C. recently replied to a message from Stephan. I
received Peter's reply but not Stephan's message.
I meant to say 'Stefan Salewski' here.
John Griessen wrote:
Does the category low end bother you?
It is at the low end of the price tag scale :-)
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895
Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211
Welfengarten 1,
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:18:20 -0500
John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
Does the category low end bother you?
Well, I think low-end is not very specific in reality. Does gEDA
really belong in the category of EAGLE, or is it much more powerful?
Maybe the “low-end” attitude toward gEDA is
On Sep 2, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:18:20 -0500
John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote:
Does the category low end bother you?
Well, I think low-end is not very specific in reality. Does gEDA
really belong in the category of
14 matches
Mail list logo
