Re: gEDA-user: GL on non-accelerated hardware?

2011-05-19 Thread Peter Clifton
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 02:56 +0200, Levente Kovacs wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:17:34 +0100 Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote: Anyway, it would be worth testing to check I tested it on my notebook. It has an Atom CPU with an intel GPU. With the GL renderer it can do 7fps. What GPU

Re: gEDA-user: GL on non-accelerated hardware?

2011-05-18 Thread Levente Kovacs
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:17:34 +0100 Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote: Anyway, it would be worth testing to check I tested it on my notebook. It has an Atom CPU with an intel GPU. With the GL renderer it can do 7fps. With the original renderer it is 7.2. No significant change. Levente --

gEDA-user: GL on non-accelerated hardware?

2011-05-16 Thread Kovacs Levente
Hi, Is there any drawbacks running the GL renderer on system without hardware openGL support? Thanks, Levente -- Kovacs Levente leventel...@gmail.com Voice: +36705071002 ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org

Re: gEDA-user: GL on non-accelerated hardware?

2011-05-16 Thread Peter Clifton
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:45 +0200, Kovacs Levente wrote: Hi, Is there any drawbacks running the GL renderer on system without hardware openGL support? It would be slower than the non-GL version, due to the software emulation of the graphics calls. Your X11 driver might have had 2D

Re: gEDA-user: GL on non-accelerated hardware?

2011-05-16 Thread Kovacs Levente
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:17:34 +0100 Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote: It would be slower than the non-GL version, due to the software emulation of the graphics calls. Your X11 driver might have had 2D acceleration for the non-GL version's rendering calls, for example. Even if the non-GL