On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 02:56 +0200, Levente Kovacs wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:17:34 +0100
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Anyway, it would be worth testing to check
I tested it on my notebook. It has an Atom CPU with an intel GPU.
With the GL renderer it can do 7fps.
What GPU
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:17:34 +0100
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Anyway, it would be worth testing to check
I tested it on my notebook. It has an Atom CPU with an intel GPU.
With the GL renderer it can do 7fps.
With the original renderer it is 7.2.
No significant change.
Levente
--
Hi,
Is there any drawbacks running the GL renderer on system without hardware
openGL support?
Thanks,
Levente
--
Kovacs Levente leventel...@gmail.com
Voice: +36705071002
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:45 +0200, Kovacs Levente wrote:
Hi,
Is there any drawbacks running the GL renderer on system without hardware
openGL support?
It would be slower than the non-GL version, due to the software
emulation of the graphics calls.
Your X11 driver might have had 2D
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:17:34 +0100
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
It would be slower than the non-GL version, due to the software
emulation of the graphics calls.
Your X11 driver might have had 2D acceleration for the non-GL
version's rendering calls, for example. Even if the non-GL
5 matches
Mail list logo