Re: gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-17 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:11:13 -0400 DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: EVERY time I draw a new footprint, I spend half the time figuring out where the “imaginary” line endpoint should lie. I just use the rectangle tool. Oh! I forgot you can use the rectangle tool to make pads too. That

Re: gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-16 Thread Peter Clifton
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 18:34 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote: Exciting news everyone! I have just pushed the nanometer conversion patches to git HEAD. I'm really glad to see this work merged. When I get a moment, I will rebase my PCB+GL branches against it. (I might do it in a few gentle steps,

Re: gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-16 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:53:21PM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 18:34 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote: Exciting news everyone! I have just pushed the nanometer conversion patches to git HEAD. I'm really glad to see this work merged. When I get a moment, I will rebase

Re: gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-16 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:53:21 +0100 Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote: I have some ideas about how pad-stacks could be made more general though, so a square pad (like many others) is just a special case of a polygon - which can, of course.. be rotated arbitrarily, either at the pad level, or

Re: gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-16 Thread DJ Delorie
EVERY time I draw a new footprint, I spend half the time figuring out where the “imaginary” line endpoint should lie. I just use the rectangle tool. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org

gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-15 Thread Andrew Poelstra
Exciting news everyone! I have just pushed the nanometer conversion patches to git HEAD. Please test and let me know how things are working. I have compiled all 56 commits (by script) to confirm that they can compile so git bisect will work. I have done a few save/load tests. There does not

Re: gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-15 Thread Russell Dill
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote: Exciting news everyone! I have just pushed the nanometer conversion patches to git HEAD. Please test and let me know how things are working. I have compiled all 56 commits (by script) to confirm that they can compile so

Re: gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-15 Thread Felix Ruoff
Congratulations! Really an impressive work! I found an 'incomplete function' (or bug) with the new coord-entry in the gtk gui: The spinning-arrows just work with mil unit set. Even, when changed to mm and back to mil, they don't work at my short test. And: the line /* FIXME:

Re: gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-15 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:47:18PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote: Congratulations! Really an impressive work! I found an 'incomplete function' (or bug) with the new coord-entry in the gtk gui: The spinning-arrows just work with mil unit set. Even, when changed to mm and back to mil,

Re: gEDA-user: Nanometer conversion pushed to git head

2011-08-15 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:47:18PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote: Congratulations! Really an impressive work! I found an 'incomplete function' (or bug) with the new coord-entry in the gtk gui: The spinning-arrows just work with mil unit set. Even, when changed to mm and back to mil,