Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-02-02 Thread Frank Bergmann
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:52:40 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: Fixed. Amusingly enough, the lesstif hid had the same conflict, but avoided it as that file didn't pull in the header. Now it builds, thanks! ___ geda-user mailing list

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-02-01 Thread Frank Bergmann
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:26:59 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: and pushed my changes to the master. Enjoy! fetching it from git but gives me an error while compiling for gtk hid. in hid/gtk/gui-netlist-window.c:978 is already a function NetlistChanged() as you introduced with your commits:

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-31 Thread DJ Delorie
I changed the actions to be like this: ElementList(start) ElementList(need,...) ElementList(done) Netlist(freeze) Netlist(add,...) Netlist(thaw) and pushed my changes to the master. Enjoy! Obviously, we'll keep fiddling with it as we get more people using it, but

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-30 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 19:33 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: Since the import method is gnetlist, I assume we don't have to make this a gEDA specific field. I did think (briefly) that we ought to name-space the sources for Import schematics. What's geda-specific about import::src4 ? Nothing.. I

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-29 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 13:03 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: Well, here it is. Yes, I know it's not in git's pretty format, but it's a bunch of local commits that make no sense separately. Discuss, then I'll commit it all. I'm interested in the diffstat (re-ordered to show the biggest changes):

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-29 Thread DJ Delorie
Minor nit - pcblf is not a great name for the backend. Outside our circle, lf is probably not something many will understand, and might end up being one of those FAQ's like Ben mode. Yup. Suggestions? pcbfa? pcbfwd? pcbimport? pcbmigrate? sch2pcb? Netlist(Add,name,pin,defer)

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-29 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:04 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: Good idea. Should freeze/thaw nest, or be a simple flag? Many implementations nest, emitting the notify when the count gets to zero. I don't imagine it would be too hard to make the implementation nest though. I can't (at the moment), think

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-29 Thread Vanessa Ezekowitz
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:04:29 -0500 DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: Minor nit - pcblf is not a great name for the backend. Outside our circle, lf is probably not something many will understand, and might end up being one of those FAQ's like Ben mode. Yup. Suggestions? pcbfa?

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-29 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 14:02 -0600, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote: On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:04:29 -0500 DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: Minor nit - pcblf is not a great name for the backend. Outside our circle, lf is probably not something many will understand, and might end up being one

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-29 Thread Peter Clifton
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 13:03 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: import::src0 ... import::src99 (etc) schematic files. Note that the list stops at the first missing number in sequence, even if there are higher numbered sources present. Since the import method is gnetlist, I assume we

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-29 Thread DJ Delorie
A couple of options I thought of pcb-action or pcb-actions. (Since it effectively creates a PCB action script - is that right?) Right, but there are more types of action scripts than just the one this produces. (Although since it is gEDA specific, it might be good to mention that) It isn't.

Re: gEDA-user: PCB LF patch: single foward annotate sch-pcb button

2010-01-29 Thread DJ Delorie
Since the import method is gnetlist, I assume we don't have to make this a gEDA specific field. I did think (briefly) that we ought to name-space the sources for Import schematics. What's geda-specific about import::src4 ? For sake of argument, if we had a xcircuit import method, I could