Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-19 Thread Felix Ruoff
Hello, I just realized, that the 'view'-label in the status bar is still displaying the 'old' boardsize-names. The appended patch replaces them with 'top' and 'bottom'. Should I do a separate bug-report for this? Kind regards, Felix Am 11.04.2011 01:42, schrieb DJ Delorie: I'm pondering a

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread gedau
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:58:51AM +0530, Abhijit Kshirsagar wrote: 1. Agree! I'd find this much more intuitive and easy to work with. The layers option will be a big help... +1 I also like the ieda of dropping component/solder side, replacing it with whatever else that suggests one side and

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread Stephan Boettcher
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk writes: On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 19:42 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: I'm pondering a minor change in pcb's defaults to give us a more useful default stackup. How's this? LAYERNAME (1, top), LAYERNAME (2, ground), LAYERNAME (3, signal2), LAYERNAME (4,

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread DJ Delorie
Is it really the layer order, or the group order that PCB+GL or Ben-mode uses? PCB draws in group order, not layer order. So you can order the drawing layers as you wish, as long as the group order is set to your stacking order. ___ geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread DJ Delorie
I basically agree, but why stop here and not add a Z coordinate to each layer? You deleted the answer to that: Note that this would be an interim change until we get around to either a new-board-wizard or new-means-load-template. ___ geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:20:11AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: I basically agree, but why stop here and not add a Z coordinate to each layer? You deleted the answer to that: Note that this would be an interim change until we get around to either a new-board-wizard or

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread DJ Delorie
Well, I did not really understand that paragraph. Anyeay, fine with me, although I don't really see the interest of an interim step. I.e none of us have time right now to completely rewrite how layers work This was a fairly quick change which should make the current PCB more obviously usable

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread John Griessen
On 04/11/2011 02:11 AM, Gabriel Paubert wrote: consider layers with the same Z coordinate as a layer group OK, that could be used for stackup, and also farther along, Z is a general axis designator, so would become Z position in the stackup, so your group number attrib should be some other

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread Peter Clifton
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 08:18 +0200, Stephan Boettcher wrote: Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk writes: Is it really the layer order, or the group order that PCB+GL or Ben-mode uses? The group numbering - and I don't see any reason why we can't stipulate that is the rendering sequence. -- Peter

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread DJ Delorie
The group numbering - and I don't see any reason why we can't stipulate that is the rendering sequence. I think we decided that a while back. The group order *is* the stacking order. Now we just need to figure out how to enforce it :-) ___

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread Steven Michalske
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:35 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: Now we just need to figure out how to enforce it :-) With a stick! ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread Vanessa Ezekowitz
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:45:18 +0200 Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote: DJ Delorie wrote: I'm pondering a minor change in pcb's defaults to give us a more useful default stackup. How's this? LAYERNAME (1, top), LAYERNAME (2, ground), LAYERNAME (3, signal2),

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread Mark Rages
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:42 PM, DJ Delorie d...@delorie.com wrote: I'm pondering a minor change in pcb's defaults to give us a more useful default stackup.  How's this? My netlist enters pcb by way of gsch2pcb, which supplies its own default stackup. Can these be kept in sync somehow?

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-11 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
Mark Rages wrote: My netlist enters pcb by way of gsch2pcb, which supplies its own default stackup. Can these be kept in sync somehow? My current work-around is to call pcb without a filename but with multiple command line options to set the layer stack. After a save with the desired name,

gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread DJ Delorie
I'm pondering a minor change in pcb's defaults to give us a more useful default stackup. How's this? LAYERNAME (1, top), LAYERNAME (2, ground), LAYERNAME (3, signal2), LAYERNAME (4, signal3), LAYERNAME (5, power), LAYERNAME (6, bottom), LAYERNAME (7, outline), LAYERNAME (8,

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread Peter Clifton
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 19:42 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: I'm pondering a minor change in pcb's defaults to give us a more useful default stackup. How's this? LAYERNAME (1, top), LAYERNAME (2, ground), LAYERNAME (3, signal2), LAYERNAME (4, signal3), LAYERNAME (5, power),

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
DJ Delorie wrote: I'm pondering a minor change in pcb's defaults to give us a more useful default stackup. How's this? LAYERNAME (1, top), LAYERNAME (2, ground), LAYERNAME (3, signal2), LAYERNAME (4, signal3), LAYERNAME (5, power), LAYERNAME (6, bottom), LAYERNAME (7,

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread Bob Paddock
3. Rename outer layers to top/bottom, which seems to be what other   packages (specifically, eagle and kicad) use.  Component/solder   isn't as obvious with SMT. Sometimes the outer layers are called Primary and Secondary. Consider a board of memory chips. Some memories come in mirror image

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread DJ Delorie
I concede that Top/Bottom is more common, not necessarily accurate. We can't just call them this side and that side :-) ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread John Griessen
On 04/10/2011 06:42 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: would such a layout be a better default for you? Fine by me. JG -- Ecosensory Austin TX ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread John Griessen
On 04/10/2011 08:26 PM, Bob Paddock wrote: Sometimes the outer layers are called Primary and Secondary. Main and Second are shorter and might convey similar meaning and be more usable... JG ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread Steven Michalske
Pci cards call them A and B sides. But that too is odd. It seems that, like it or not, top and bottom are the industry standard. On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:24 AM, John Griessen j...@ecosensory.com wrote: On 04/10/2011 08:26 PM, Bob Paddock wrote: Sometimes the outer layers are called

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread Abhijit Kshirsagar
1. Agree! I'd find this much more intuitive and easy to work with. The layers option will be a big help... 2. What would go to the outline layer? The gerber files have outlines for each layer right? ~Abhijit ___ geda-user mailing list

Re: gEDA-user: default pcb stackup change?

2011-04-10 Thread DJ Delorie
2. What would go to the outline layer? The shape of your board, for example. The gerber files have outlines for each layer right? Not by default, no. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org