Andrew Poelstra wrote:
I'm not sure what to do about them. Right now I have a giant
table of default/max/min for all these units, which totals 12
values per unit. Times ten currently-supported units, this is
120 values!
I'd be ok with some standard set of grid stops which gets coarser
the
Colin D Bennett wrote:
Maybe we can store the grids in user preferences instead,
but that's potentially a fair bit of work.
Regardless of implementation difficulty, user preferences are NOT the
place to store grid configurations, since each layout will surely have
its own grid setup
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:09:13AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
There is already some information in user preference that should
really be configurabel on a per project base. Skipping through the
file:
grid-units-mm = 1
This will turn into
grid-units = mm
I was quite frustrated to
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:30:43PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
These too will be changed as we move away from a strict mm/mil
configuration.
I'm not sure what to do about them. Right now I have a giant
table of default/max/min for all these units, which totals 12
values per unit. Times
Great. As an astronomer, I really need to be able to define
my PCB in astronomical units and parsecs :-)
A while back, I had jokingly suggested supporting attoparsecs...
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:55:02 +0200
Gabriel Paubert paub...@iram.es wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:30:43PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
These too will be changed as we move away from a strict mm/mil
configuration.
I'm not sure what to do about them. Right now I have a giant
table
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:30:43 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 02:09:13AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
There is already some information in user preference that should
really be configurabel on a per project base. Skipping through the
file:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:05:56 -0700
Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:55:02 +0200
Gabriel Paubert paub...@iram.es wrote:
Great. As an astronomer, I really need to be able to define
my PCB in astronomical units and parsecs :-)
You'll have to wait for 64-bit
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 01:56:23PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
Great. As an astronomer, I really need to be able to define
my PCB in astronomical units and parsecs :-)
A while back, I had jokingly suggested supporting attoparsecs...
And why we are at it, get rid of the 1/2 oz and similar
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:52:38 -0700
Colin D Bennett co...@gibibit.com wrote:
While I really would like the advanced user-defined grids as in the
recent patch, at least fixing this will help. Often I want to measure
something in mils as I am laying out components on a metric grid. So
I click
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:48:38AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
To follow up on this, the bug with the new patch is at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/724154
also see the geda-user mailing list thread titled “Please test new
grids for GTK PCB” started 24 Feb 2011:
Grids could be stored as top-level attributes...
Attribute(grid:... );
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:06:02 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:48:38AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
To follow up on this, the bug with the new patch is at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/724154
also see the geda-user mailing list thread titled
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:06:02 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
Maybe we can store the grids in user preferences instead,
but that's potentially a fair bit of work.
Regardless of implementation difficulty, user preferences are NOT the
place to store grid configurations, since each
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:06:02 -0700
Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:48:38AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
To follow up on this, the bug with the new patch is at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/724154
also see the geda-user mailing list thread titled
The current file format already supports Attribute()
Sent by R2-D2 astromech droid
-Original message-
From: Vanessa Ezekowitz vanessaezekow...@gmail.com
To: geda-user@moria.seul.org
Sent: Tue, Jul 12, 2011 21:48:32 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: pcb grid
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:47:39PM -0400, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
Why not add the Attribute() item as DJ suggested, but put it
at the top somewhere, inside a comment? Versions of PCB that
don't understand it would simply ignore it.
Move it out of commented out status when that major file
17 matches
Mail list logo
