I hope the attachment comes through. If not, I'll post it somewhere.
I cannot get rid of the jagged diagonal lines on my design. There's
lots of them. The picture shows a couple of examples. I've tried
different grid sizes, line widths, but nothing fixes the problem.
Redrawing them in
Are you allowing all direction lines?
While if you are only drawing a straight line between 2 points there should not
be a jagged line.
Can you strip it down to one example trace? And send the file.
Steve
On Oct 7, 2010, at 7:09 PM, gene glick carzr...@optonline.net wrote:
I hope the
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 07:09 -0400, gene glick wrote:
Grid space is 1 mil.
Why do you need such a fine grid?
I think I ask you some months ago, and suggested to use larger grid and
employ snap to pins/pads.
Such a fine grid is similar to no grid at all, so I am not really
surprised about your
I cannot get rid of the jagged diagonal lines on my design. There's lots of
them. The picture shows a couple of examples. I've tried different grid
sizes, line widths, but nothing fixes the problem. Redrawing them in order
to eliminate any sections does not help. On PCB, it shows at
On Oct 6, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Dave N6NZ wrote:
I think a lot of people confuse the difference between a theoretical
physicist and an experimental physicist.
A theoretical uses a whiteboard and marker. He/She writes a paper.
An experimental physicist reads the paper and goes -- Oh,
Another thought, I usuially place my parts on a 100 mil grid, maybe on
a 50 mil grid.
Steve
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:55:43 -0400, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com
wrote:
Oh, I almost forgot, NEVER ask a PhD anything to design PCBs. What
the heck are you thinking???
Are you trolling, or just ignorant?
Peter
--
Peter Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk
Remote Sensing Research Group
Surrey
On Oct 7, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 22:29 +0800, Steven Michalske wrote:
I cannot get rid of the jagged diagonal lines on my design. There's lots
of them. The picture shows a couple of examples. I've tried different
grid sizes, line widths, but
Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it in Ruby,
using GTK/Cairo.
You may ask: Do we really need one?
No, gschem works fine.
You may say: That is wasting of your time.
Maybe...
You may say: You should
Why do you need such a fine grid?
Because it lets me route the 8/8 traces without excessive spaces. BTW,
I manually make the spacing 9, but the rules are set at 8.
I think I ask you some months ago, and suggested to use larger
grid and
employ snap to pins/pads.
Yes, I
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 18:20 +, carzr...@optonline.net wrote:
Why do you need such a fine grid?
Because it lets me route the 8/8 traces without excessive spaces.
If you really need 1 mil grid, then there is something wrong -- with PCB
or your layout process.
When I get home,
Hi all,
I don't know where to even start trying to figure out this problem. If
you can give me a clue, I would very much appreciate it.
I have identical builds of a recent git version pcb on my laptop and
desktop and a few other machines. PCB runs just fine on everything but
my desktop. On
Dave N6NZ wrote:
I've had perfectly explainable jaggies that occur when I am
routing parallel traces. The 2nd through Nth traces of a
parallel group can be pushed up against the previous traces
as close as min-space, and therefore end up off-grid. This
is great for routing density, but
Steven Michalske wrote:
Another thought, I usuially place my parts on a 100 mil grid,
maybe on a 50 mil grid.
I prefer 1 mm, sometimes 0.5 mm :-)
(Are there any plans to make inside pcb metric?)
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 01:00:50AM +0200, kai-martin knaak wrote:
I prefer 1 mm, sometimes 0.5 mm :-)
(Are there any plans to make inside pcb metric?)
I would vote for this.
(But no, not that I've heard.)
Andrew
___
geda-user mailing list
Rather than picking an arbitrary grid I have found a happy mix of
most of the small pitch metric parts (0.65 mm pitch MSOP, SSOP,
TSSOP) and a 0.1625 mm grid. I typically use 6/6 space/trace design
rules which most houses work with ok which is the same as my grid
(give or take the metric/inch
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 16:23 -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 01:00:50AM +0200, kai-martin knaak wrote:
I prefer 1 mm, sometimes 0.5 mm :-)
(Are there any plans to make inside pcb metric?)
I would vote for this.
(But no, not that I've heard.)
Andrew
Our
On Oct 7, 2010, at 5:00 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
(Are there any plans to make inside pcb metric?)
A couple of years ago I suggested making the fundamental units nanometers,
since that would make decimal fractions of inches exactly representable as
integers down to 0.01 mil. 0.01 mil =
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 17:37 -0600, John Doty wrote:
On Oct 7, 2010, at 5:00 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
(Are there any plans to make inside pcb metric?)
A couple of years ago I suggested making the fundamental units nanometers,
since that would make decimal fractions of inches exactly
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 05:37:48PM -0600, John Doty wrote:
On Oct 7, 2010, at 5:00 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
(Are there any plans to make inside pcb metric?)
A couple of years ago I suggested making the fundamental units
nanometers, since that would make decimal fractions of inches
Do you have Xinerama enabled?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 14:41 -0700, Cory Cross wrote:
Laptop Desktop both run Debian unstable with Linux 2.6.32 for 686,
Xorg 1.7.7
Laptop uses intel driver for 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express
Desktop uses open-source radeon driver for Radeon 9250
Are you using compositing? (e.g. compiz
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 07:09 -0400, gene glick wrote:
I hope the attachment comes through. If not, I'll post it somewhere.
I cannot get rid of the jagged diagonal lines on my design. There's
lots of them. The picture shows a couple of examples. I've tried
different grid sizes, line
If the tracks select as a single piece, it is just a rendering artefact
due to the line not being _exactly_ 45 degrees. The gerber plot might be
better when viewed in High quality mode in gerbv.
PCB, and the lower quality gerbv modes don't render anti-aliased lines,
so this is likely the
Go for it! I think your idea is really neat. I'm a hard core Ruby
programmer and have had similar experiences - you can say a lot in a
little bit of space, the code is very readable, and coding goes
quickly. I can think of some other useful applications for a Ruby
version of gschem. A
25 matches
Mail list logo
