On Sunday 25 April 2010, kai-martin knaak wrote:
6) Opamps:
a) An ideal opamp with essentially infinite
amplification, infinite slew rate, zero bias current, no
input offset, etc.
Here's an op-amp:
* Generic op-amp behavioral model
.subckt opamp (out+ out- in+ in-)
.param
A bit more reading and thinking reveals a problem with current gpart:
To express the many-to-many relation between parts and symbols it uses
a table called device. This is fed by the infamous device attribute
in the symbol libraries. There's nothing wrong in the theory of DB-design
with it, but
[snip]
If you get a blank page, then it means that DNS hasn't been fully
propagated (or if it has, then I've managed to mess something up).
DNS seems to have propagated sufficient, so most services should
be up and running. Let me know if you see something broken.
Hi All,
I'm using Ubuntu and needed to update geda-gaf, as version in repository
is older than latest released. Since RFTM'ing is not my strongest side,
spent an hour or so wondering why configure would fail, even though I
installed guile-1.8 package. Now it seems trivial that I needed
Hi,
Is there a way to suppress the command prompt window in the Win32
builds? Does anyone have any idea what causes that artefact to arise?
Thanks,
Duncan
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:40 PM, John Doty wrote:
Well, you started out complaining about a 741 model. I'd call that a very
rare, obsolete part: I haven't actually seen one in a circuit in over 30
years. I guess it's still in textbooks (read
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
Very rare?! I see 741s everywhere. WTF?
Different worlds. You make my point.
Why is anybody using anything so crummy in the 21st century?
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
j...@noqsi.com
im guessing something related to the geda is a collection of a bunch
of random command line scripts and...
anyway, i saw it there last time i bothered trying pcb on windows and
i was like lol professional.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Duncan Drennan
duncan.dren...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 14:01 +0200, Duncan Drennan wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to suppress the command prompt window in the Win32
builds? Does anyone have any idea what causes that artefact to arise?
Are you building yourself?
Just add the -mwindows flag to the linker command line and the
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 14:19 +0300, Justas Poderys wrote:
Hi All,
I'm using Ubuntu and needed to update geda-gaf, as version in repository
is older than latest released. Since RFTM'ing is not my strongest side,
spent an hour or so wondering why configure would fail, even though I
installed
thats not the window he's talking about.
how about actually running the windows build.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 14:01 +0200, Duncan Drennan wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to suppress the command prompt window in the Win32
builds?
On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:21 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
I think we need to try to be consistent, and adding suggestions for
every possible point of failure could be a lot of work.
More a FAQ than something that belongs in the code.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Dave McGuire wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:40 PM, John Doty wrote:
Well, you started out complaining about a 741 model. I'd call that
a very rare, obsolete part: I haven't actually seen one in a
circuit in over 30 years. I guess it's still in
How about fixing it then.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:23 +0900, timecop wrote:
thats not the window he's talking about.
Yes it is.
how about actually running the windows build.
I'm the one who built it!
--
Peter Clifton
Are you building yourself?
Just add the -mwindows flag to the linker command line and the console
will go away.
Fixing up the Makefiles to add $(MINGW_GUI_LDFLAGS) to the
gschem_LDFLAGS variables should fix the issue. (And similar for
gattrib).
Thanks for the help Peter, I'll have a look
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 15:23 +0200, Duncan Drennan wrote:
Are you building yourself?
Just add the -mwindows flag to the linker command line and the console
will go away.
Fixing up the Makefiles to add $(MINGW_GUI_LDFLAGS) to the
gschem_LDFLAGS variables should fix the issue. (And
On Thursday 29 April 2010, Dave McGuire wrote:
On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:48 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Well, you started out complaining about a 741 model. I'd call that
a very rare, obsolete part: I haven't actually seen one in a
circuit in over 30 years. I guess it's still in textbooks (read
On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Russell Shaw wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Dave McGuire wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:40 PM, John Doty wrote:
Well, you started out complaining about a 741 model. I'd call that
a very rare, obsolete part: I haven't actually seen one in a
On Thursday 29 April 2010, Russell Shaw wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Dave McGuire wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:40 PM, John Doty wrote:
Well, you started out complaining about a 741 model. I'd call that
a very rare, obsolete part: I haven't actually seen one in a
On Thursday 29 April 2010, John Doty wrote:
On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Russell Shaw wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Dave McGuire wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:40 PM, John Doty wrote:
Well, you started out complaining about a 741 model. I'd call that
a very rare,
gcc 4.4.2 recent enough?
Clicking on the link below in Chrome or IE6 is failing my view of
Action Of Lease Surprise:
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/dl/ofc/current/v2gnu/gcc442b.zip
I'm shown the contents of the .zip file, rather than starting a
transfer of the .zip file with a Left Click.
Right
I'm shown the contents of the .zip file, rather than starting a
transfer of the .zip file with a Left Click.
Right, the dl directory is for downloading files from *within* the
zips. Use the zip picker to find a local HTTP mirror and
user-specific installation instructions:
On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:05 AM, timecop wrote:
im guessing something related to the geda is a collection of a bunch
of random command line scripts and...
anyway, i saw it there last time i bothered trying pcb on windows and
i was like lol professional.
Those last two words that close together
On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:03 AM, John Doty wrote:
Very rare?! I see 741s everywhere. WTF?
Different worlds. You make my point.
Why is anybody using anything so crummy in the 21st century?
Most of them that I see are at least ten years old. That said,
they're cheap, readily available
Ok, timecop, you have a serious attitude problem.
Just sayin'.
-Dave
On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:59 AM, timecop wrote:
How about fixing it then.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk
wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 21:23 +0900, timecop wrote:
thats not the
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:19:42 +0300, Justas Poderys j...@seminte.lt wrote:
Hi All,
I'm using Ubuntu and needed to update geda-gaf, as version in repository
is older than latest released. Since RFTM'ing is not my strongest side,
spent an hour or so wondering why configure would fail, even
Hi,
I read some of the SQL files yesterday and just started an attempt to
build gparts.
The INSTAL file list requirements for building with MySQL and PostgreSQL.
The later are present on my machine and I'm used to that DB.
Then it's stated, that PostgreSQL is not supported yet. What is
Hello,
how can i perform scattering S-parameter analysis with gEDA? Can i
create a model from a s2p (touchstone) file model?
Thanks in advance,
Nacho.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
Another strange thing with gparts:
in 'sql/mysql/create-basic.sql' one finds:
cut
...
CREATE TABLE Symbol (
SymbolIDINTEGER UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
SymbolPath VARCHAR(500) NOT NULL,
DeviceIDINTEGER UNSIGNED
On Thursday 29 April 2010, ignacio.dieg...@estumail.ucm.es
wrote:
how can i perform scattering S-parameter analysis with gEDA?
Can i create a model from a s2p (touchstone) file model?
Nothing with gEDA that does it directly and is ready to go.
Your best bet is probably Qucs. It's GUI
Hi, I am very interested to find out what you choose to use for this
sort of analysis. I have played a bit with qucs and agree that's a good
place to start. Please post back your findings!
Geoff
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:08 AM, al davis [1]ad...@freeelectron.net
wrote:
On Apr 29, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
What should I replace
the obsolete OP220 with?
What was it trying to do? That will have a heavy bearing on the replacement
choice.
Mainly not waste too much power ;-)
I used these for a variety of low power, low speed, moderately high
I've got a patch ready for testing (attached), and if you can confirm it
works, I'll push it to git HEAD once Ales declares the servers are ready
for use again.
Working as expected - thanks for that.
___
geda-user mailing list
John Doty wrote:
On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
Very rare?! I see 741s everywhere. WTF?
Different worlds. You make my point.
Why is anybody using anything so crummy in the 21st century?
Perhaps, like me they have a pile of them. I'm staring at about 25 of
[snip]
I've got a patch ready for testing (attached), and if you can confirm it
works, I'll push it to git HEAD once Ales declares the servers are ready
for use again.
git on the new server should be ready for use now (all
repositories). Please report any issues, cause I probably
35 matches
Mail list logo
