On Sep 30, 2010, at 7:00 AM, Armin Faltl armin.fa...@aon.at wrote:
Yes and No. The number of practical orientations a board and part can have
are very limited,
but to check them, until now a human will be involved. True automation
readines requires
that you can feed the file into the
On Sep 30, 2010, at 7:43 AM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
Trouble is that the machine doesn't know how the parts are oriented in the
feeders. Rather than trust that the system works if they get each piece
right, they manually run through an sample of each component type to
On Sep 30, 2010, at 7:43 AM, Rick Collins gnuarm.2...@arius.com wrote:
they manually run through an sample of each component type to make sure it is
placed on the board right. That is all they care about and you only do this
once for a given board. They call this setup and charge a
Great!
Now let me suggest some kind of Patchlevel 0.
Most of these patches deal with well-known issues
discussed on the list or on the tracker; some of them
are years old.
Of course, there are lots of more patches e.g. on the tracker;
I just randomly picked some obvious ones that were not
I suggest we give this release a few weeks stress-test, then do
another late October, focusing on bug fixes. I'd like to make it
build for windows much easier too. After Oct 17th I'll have more time
for it anyway.
Perhaps frequent patch releases on this source base would make
sense. Every 2-3
Steven Michalske wrote:
Would registration marks help with this? Three points forming approximately a
90 degree corner. Would give the ability to detect +x,+y
I know our smt lines heavily depend on these marks.
Steve
I think registration marks help a lot. Attached you find my favourite
On Sep 28, 2010, at 7:25 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
One of the things that attracted me to gEDA years ago was how
clean and concise the documentation was.
Coincidently, some of the my most frustrating experiences with geda/pcb
were due to a lack of readily available documentation ;-)
7 matches
Mail list logo
