Hi
I discovered a bug in the partslist[1-3] backend for gnetlist when
processing hierarchical designs. It strips the refdes of sub-schematic
symbols from the sub-schematic components meaning you end up with
duplicate refdes's. I've attached a patch which should fix this issue.
To reproduce the
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 06:12 -0400, vinny wrote:
I can move components but not trace, is there way to do that?
Select the traces you want to move and the layer you wish to move them
to. Select 'EditMove selected to current layer' or press Shift-M. You
can also just press M when the cursor is over
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 17:01 -0700, David McQuate wrote:
I've tried clicking, double-clicking, click-and-drag, mouse button
combinations, shift / control / alt click.
Nothing seems to bring the menus and buttons back from their grayed-out
inactive state.
The mouse cursor still moves, and
Hi,
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 15:19 -0400, Rick Collins wrote:
No, as you can see above, your reply is all run
together. I also have this problem with one
poster in the ZPU mail list. He says it is
Eudora, but I only have the problem with two or
three posters. Go figure! Do computers
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 12:48 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
We have lines starting with a letter followed by up to 16 decimal
numbers
We are NOT going with another position-determines-meaning file format.
May I suggest that while deciding on a file format and choosing how it
will work it would be
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 21:31 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
The same happens with partslist2. How come? When producing a netlist,
gnetlist obviously can descend to sub sheets and extract the involved
symbols. What would it take to make BOM creation aware of hierarchy, too?
I don't know if
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:08 +0100, Robert Spanton wrote:
Can someone with push rights to gaf get Richard's gnetlist patch into
mainline?
It would be very useful if someone could either accept or reject this
patch as it is beginning to cause problems for my organisation.
Thanks,
Richard
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 17:29 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Throw the most complex usually-hideously-slow board at it.. how does it
perform?
I've run the benchmark on the most complex board that I've currently
designed in PCB.
Run on a AMD Phenom 9750 (4822 bogomips) with nVidia GeForce
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 02:01 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
Perhaps try with the patch I just sent in reply to KMK which moves a
couple of glEnableClientState calls.
Using VBOs that gives 85.4FPS, so effectively no difference.
Using arrays it gives an average of 93.1FPS, literally no difference!
Hi,
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 14:35 +0100, Bert Timmerman wrote:
I tried the above and ran into trouble with the requirement of gtkglext-1.0:
there seems to be no such RPM package available for Fedora 13 ;-(
I'm running Fedora 13 and had no problems. Installing the gtkglext-devel
package provides
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 09:46 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
1. My VBOs and arrays are pretty large buffers, to fit lots of geometry.
...
So.. we have a large buffer. That is a large chunk of graphics memory to
be requesting all the time. I think that contributes if the card doesn't
have a
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 17:21 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d_packages_mockup3.png
http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/pcb+gl_3d/pcb+gl_3d_packages_mockup4.png
Wow, they look amazing!
Perhaps pixel shaders and bump mapping is a little
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 00:12 +0200, Markus Hitter wrote:
Am 11.06.2011 um 23:39 schrieb Colin D Bennett:
Try re-running 'sh autogen.sh' before configure.
Thanks, Colin, this was it.
Now I get
disabling 3D rasterization
segmentation fault
I also got a segmentation fault after
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:08 +0100, Rob Spanton wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 01:46 +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
With a number of recommended work-flows PCB and gschem do not
return to the last saved state. Instead, they update to the
current state of the source file. The gsch2pcb
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:42 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:09 +0100, Richard Barlow wrote:
I've started implementing this[1] with a little help from the gedit
source. Unfortunately the info bar widget that I've used was introduced
in GTK 2.18 and PCB currently depends
15 matches
Mail list logo
