Stefan Salewski wrote:
Following the documentation we always have to do the translation
to 0/0, when we save a symbol.
Yes, the documentation is a bit too rigorous at this point. The
only consequence of a symbol not translated to 0/0 is a potential
inconvenience on placement. The symbol may
Stefan Salewski wrote:
And that is a real problem. gschem should really be able to to this
automatically when saving symbols.
IMHO, it should not. Every translation breaks instances of the symbol
in existing schematics.
A better solution would be the notion of an origin, similar to the
Den 2010-12-24 22:16:18 skrev Stephan Boettcher
boettc...@physik.uni-kiel.de:
Johnny Rosenberg gurus.knu...@gmail.com writes:
At http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gsch2pcb_tutorial the following
is written:
”When all the edits are done, it's very important when editing symbols
to do a
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 09:17 +0100, kai-martin knaak wrote:
Stefan Salewski wrote:
And that is a real problem. gschem should really be able to to this
automatically when saving symbols.
IMHO, it should not. Every translation breaks instances of the symbol
in existing schematics.
A
At http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gsch2pcb_tutorial the following is
written:
”When all the edits are done, it's very important when editing symbols to
do a Edit→Symbol Translate to zero before saving. Do that and then save
the symbol with File→Save Page”
My problem is that there is
Johnny Rosenberg gurus.knu...@gmail.com writes:
At http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gsch2pcb_tutorial the following
is written:
”When all the edits are done, it's very important when editing symbols
to do a Edit→Symbol Translate to zero before saving. Do that and then
save the symbol
On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 22:24 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 22:16 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
File-Save
But first it is important
Some of your fine explanations may be already at
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gschem_symbol_creation
More is here:
On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 20:34 +0100, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
At http://www.geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gsch2pcb_tutorial the following is
written:
”When all the edits are done, it's very important when editing symbols to
do a Edit→Symbol Translate to zero before saving.
And that is a real
Hi,
I encountered a segfault trying to connect a net to my shiny little
newly created symbol (attached below). I created a few symbols,
only one of those is causing a segfault (gschem from ubuntu 10.10 repos).
I would be grateful for pointing out the error in creating this symbol
Michal Dwuznik
Micha? Dwu?nik wrote:
mic...@jabberwocky:~/pcb$ cat LM1108SF33-1.sym
v 20100214 2
B 200 300 1400 1000 3 0 0 0 -1 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
N 200 1100 0 1100 1
This is a net, not a pin. Pin definition lines start with the letter P.
{
T 0 900 5 10 0 1 0 0 1
pinnumber=2
T
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 16:29, Kai-Martin Knaak
kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Micha? Dwu?nik wrote:
mic...@jabberwocky:~/pcb$ cat LM1108SF33-1.sym
v 20100214 2
B 200 300 1400 1000 3 0 0 0 -1 -1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
N 200 1100 0 1100 1
This is a net, not a pin. Pin
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:34:36 +0100
Michał Dwużnik michal.dwuznik-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
there's no visible clue in case of such error - segfault
does not seem very elegant...
You should file a bug report on SF project page. gEDA should not crash.
Levente
--
Levente
Levente Kovacs wrote:
You should file a bug report on SF project page. gEDA should
not crash.
This minimum example of a net in a symbol file that shows
the same symptoms:
/---net_crash.sym
v 20100214 2
N 200 0 0 0 1
\
To reproduce:
1) put the file
13 matches
Mail list logo
