Re: [Geeqie-devel] geeqie 1.2 tarball?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Am Mo den 8. Sep 2014 um 10:05 schrieb Paul Wise: I wanted to upload geeqie to Debian so it is in jessie but I can't find the tarball for version 1.2, do you know where it is? There is no. We still have some parts of the project on sourceforge. But considering the facts that sourceforge went to the dark force I refuse to have a account there anymore so I cannot and won't upload any tarball. I Cced that question to the devel list as I would like to move to another hoster but I don't want to do this decision alone. There are other ones that are more involved in the project. However, for debian, I just merged the upstream git to the top of debian git. The only think that is missing is to recreate the auto* files that usually gets autocreated by default in a tarball. It is just to find the right hook in dh mechanism. :-) Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJUDYNCAAoJEKZ8CrGAGfasNy4L/iwX22A6y+g3dGQQMUGxe4Pv dCRlvuQTVh9SgJkjf7W0Xjonlrjj0cG0wfU7P6pC4Cr31UxXkPDh0K4PAnfKPxD0 /SZn+h2yn4Rx45v355Xp/D/CS/bWik1iVm3iVT8Dn/oRX3NVApHzlljCBgFTxKQT PiAgzP5w2zcFpMXluUSZL0xSWZdLPqnF0jEhu2Da2OV0XvgIKKL2jlqaWhYhT1qj GjF/XqcKLv2VPmwKtO43W72TVZ7ShjUrLQpefLmUUbPT6k/DytprOwgj9K80qi9U 18lX6ZXkH4WXu1iRnTsfvaj4IYi0Wl54NvZX0d7iZ4V7V4qc+x3ozfWS4HgTE3ID zgmY4bfB0BWywaGG3wTGJPUAIY20POR9T1IuBhZzSKpiKuDfkif6RtURaTAGIj4f 1rPuMj6qVZcocv5odYXN504pwfbeh4Hpd5cKkCtrg5r9rp8iFm/YzqK+wB9hXaTk R0jV1v147Xz/urh61kT13+k7whiZSZJWrQ9bsoZOMg== =c3F9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Geeqie-devel mailing list Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel
Re: [Geeqie-devel] geeqie 1.2 tarball?
Le 08/09/2014 12:21, Klaus Ethgen a écrit : Hi, Am Mo den 8. Sep 2014 um 10:05 schrieb Paul Wise: I wanted to upload geeqie to Debian so it is in jessie but I can't find the tarball for version 1.2, do you know where it is? There is no. We still have some parts of the project on sourceforge. But considering the facts that sourceforge went to the dark force I refuse to have a account there anymore so I cannot and won't upload any tarball. I Cced that question to the devel list as I would like to move to another hoster but I don't want to do this decision alone. There are other ones that are more involved in the project. However, for debian, I just merged the upstream git to the top of debian git. The only think that is missing is to recreate the auto* files that usually gets autocreated by default in a tarball. It is just to find the right hook in dh mechanism. :-) Regards Klaus Hi, i'm fine with moving the project elsewhere, until we have clear information about where are the official website and repositories. I'm not fond of Sourceforge anyway ;) Regards, Zas -- Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Geeqie-devel mailing list Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel
Re: [Geeqie-devel] geeqie 1.2 tarball?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Paul, Am Mo den 8. Sep 2014 um 21:28 schrieb Paul Wise: Maybe.. Have to have a look into it. It basically allows you to download tarballs of git branches, tags and commits so the resulting tarballs won't have autotools stuff in them. Yes, that is the same that you can archive by git archive I think. See no sense to import them into debian git when you can merge them directly... Well, I had not the major problem with their proprietary codebase. In the past days the most important problem was the archaic support for modern repositories like git. That has been resolved for many years now, they have git and hg. I know. That was why I said past days. The most problem I myself have is that they inject proprietary code in free projects for advertisement or force users to use a advertisement downloader to get the files. The time when they start doing that I canceled my account I had with them. Yeah that was a pretty big mistake. IIRC they stopped doing that and I thought it was just a proposal rather than something in production. No, they did that and actively do that in current days. And even if they stop right now I never can trust them anymore. That's true. I would have the resources to provide that on my private server platform but I do not want to make geeqie depending on me personally. It is a free project and it should stay being one. Perhaps this WikiPedia page can help make a choice: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_software_hosting_facilities Nice reference, thanks. Even there: Countries blocked not empty for sourceforge. That is a nogo. Regards Klaus Ps. For the debian related stuff I will write outside of the list. - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C 2011-05-16 Klaus Ethgen kl...@ethgen.de Fingerprint: 85D4 CA42 952C 949B 1753 62B3 79D0 B06F 4E20 AF1C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJUDhQNAAoJEKZ8CrGAGfasd4EL/RDc9w8RLKMyC1JwGqgW7yZE kKOqROoAP3LHI0v/Us3nYSQq8u9WdumyRXm+qDaKNNjz0LGX5uLnhGobpvxWs0iX QEUwwMZaDRHssdrBnNhSaxjS7KsUdgsozqZDrE9Ys6yP0X96waEichvuW5mxCSuP 3GAmVxmLs4hcomkWC+mEl5GbZ1CejVFB/T2KutdkR8OpeL5wdFNVQ4YtoTqlHRRn lnv2ESnOHF6BL1uU8AhrUMouanUiDZqZU0hnaRRyMS+xqvr3wciIMNUZabXJFc4U iSeKnPgZhnziO5FceYmtIc81zeyua87AuM767AEGjcK5OiLtELdPccdBOSI/VnYv JxyiiHRDP4zn05LkiWVyxlXv0WkfM1vRNmOF45dlnIVov7q67BtYWKOHxFLF/Zuj MNy5lXvs370PtCheEaBXrbpA5sVy11cdScaVb5FIPULqjSYdvQMYkT+OinePUjkd CE4Ki1dIcjnyAmO7htHwlQsIkwivzEhBnNF8JmyIJg== =O7sf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Geeqie-devel mailing list Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel
Re: [Geeqie-devel] geeqie 1.2 tarball?
FWIW, I have private debian source packages using all the current dh gizmos. -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. -- Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Geeqie-devel mailing list Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel
