On Sep 17, 2009, at 6:51 PM, Nicolas Robidoux wrote:
But I am wondering if for GEGL's target user base an always pretty
good default is preferable to choose your poison.
Well, if all GEGL ever has is a always pretty good default and you
never get to pick your poison, you are making your
Question about future direction for resamplers:
Would it be better if there was only one sampler tuned for upsampling,
and one tuned for downsampling?
My previous vision for GEGL was that my research group would
contribute TWO resamplers tuned for upsampling and TWO resamplers
tuned for
On 09/18/2009 03:51 AM, Nicolas Robidoux wrote:
But I am wondering if for GEGL's target user base an always pretty
good default is preferable to choose your poison.
Comments?
As long as there is good general-purpose resampler (which could
possibly use different algorithms depending on if it
Abstract
Eric Daoust and Adam Turcotte are about to wrap up a pair of Google
Summer of Code 2009 projects having to do with new samplers. In this
document, I explain what the samplers do, how they (may) fit within
the GEGL library, and where (most likely) they are going.
I
4 matches
Mail list logo