Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

Hi Sven, I am confused. What technical reason exists to assume gegl cannot be as fast as vips? Is it memory usage? Extra necessary calculations? Some way in which parallelism is not as possible? -- Daniel On Jan 28, 2016 12:58 PM, "Sven Claussner" wrote: > Hi, > > the

[Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

Hi, the developers of VIPS/libvips, a batch image-processing library, have a performance and memory usage comparison on their website, including a GEGL test. [1] Some days ago I told John Cupitt, the maintainer there, some issues with the reported GEGL tests. In his answer to me John points out

Re: [Gegl-developer] VIPS and GEGL performance and memory usage comparison

On 28.1.2016 at 10:29 PM Daniel Rogers wrote: > Hi Sven, > > I am confused. What technical reason exists to assume gegl cannot be as > fast as vips? Is it memory usage? Extra necessary calculations? Some way > in which parallelism is not as possible? Hi Daniel, you might have misunderstood