Hi,
the developers of VIPS/libvips, a batch image-processing library,
have a performance and memory usage comparison on their website,
including a GEGL test. [1]
Some days ago I told John Cupitt, the maintainer there, some issues
with the reported GEGL tests.
In his answer to me John points out
Hi Daniel,
thanks for sharing your thoughts. I agree with you in many points.
On 29.1.2016 at 5:37 PM Daniel Rogers wrote:
* Anyone can do dynamic compilation nowadays with llvm. Imagine
taking the gegl dynamic tree, and compiling it into a single LLVM
dynamically compiled
On 28.1.2016 at 10:29 PM Daniel Rogers wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> I am confused. What technical reason exists to assume gegl cannot be as
> fast as vips? Is it memory usage? Extra necessary calculations? Some way
> in which parallelism is not as possible?
Hi Daniel,
you might have misunderstood
Hi,
I just created or updated some searches in our Bugzilla:
Searches to prepare release notes:
==
Babl - changes since last release
GEGL - changes since last release
GIMP 2.8 - changes since last release
GIMP master - changes since last release
GIMP Help -
