[gem5-users] FS system running Binary Code accessing Image Disk (without a kernel)

Hello, I am new to GEM5 and I would appreciate any guidance to start my experiment in memory access performance. I would like to measure the performance of a benchmark binary code generated by compiling an assembly code that I wrote. The assembly code accesses memory addresses where data is

[gem5-users] Executing Binary Code in FS without a Kernel

Hello, I am new to GEM5 and I would appreciate any guidance. I would like to measure the performance of a assembly benchmark code. The benchmark accesses memory addresses where data is pre-dumped at these addresses in a RAW disk image. My current setup consist of the image disk (containing the

[gem5-users] Re: Executing Binary Code in FS without a Kernel

Alain Aoun via gem5-users mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>> wrote: Hello, I am new to GEM5 and I would appreciate any guidance. I would like to measure the performance of a assembly benchmark code. The benchmark accesses memory addresses where data is pre-dumped at these addresses in a RAW di

[gem5-users] panic: Tried to read unmapped address 0x1970

Hi, I am simulation an elf_i386 (32-bit x86) assembly code in SE mode. In my assembly code, there is mov al, [esi] where esi is set to 0x1970. When running my simulation I get the following error: "panic: Tried to read unmapped address 0x1970." I am initializing the DRAM with a binary disk

[gem5-users] Re: panic: Tried to read unmapped address 0x1970

gt;1), Instr: MOV_R_M : ld al, DS:[esi] == Is this a bug in the current version of GEM5 where vaddr and paddr are not being mapped? Alain On Apr 5, 2024, at 12:45 AM, Alain Aoun via gem5-users wrote: Hi, I am simulation an elf_i386 (32-bit x

[gem5-users] Running X86 processor in Real Mode

Hi, Is it possible to force x86 processor to run in Real Mode when simulating in SE or Protected mode is the only possible configuration? Thanks, Alain ___ gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org To unsubscribe send an email to