Hi Noel,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 23:12 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
As such each request URL addresses a Content object which in turn
resolves to a Component, which finally is responsible for handling
the request and providing a response.
And this differs from a Servlet/Portlet,
I filed a JIRA on the documentation for the maven assembly plugin for
this, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-229, noting that the
requirement for a leading 0 in order to qualify the permissions
definition as being an octal number was inconsistent with the unix
chmod command. Since then I
+1
On 8/8/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/6/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the SDO
Java 1.0-incubating release. The vote thread is here ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
The vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO 1.0-incubating has completed
with 5 +1 votes being cast (3 IPMC binding) and no -1s (see the
tuscany-dev list vote thread [1] and the incubator-general vote
approval thread [2]). Thank you for reviewing and voting.
I will therefore proceed with the
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.0-incubating release
of the Java SDO project.
This project provides an implementation of the SDO 2.1 specification
[1] and this is our first release to provide full coverage of the
specification. In addition to completing the few remaining SDO
+1
Craig
On Aug 9, 2007, at 5:14 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1
On 8/8/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 8/6/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release
the SDO
Java 1.0-incubating release. The vote
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Sling. The proposal
text is attached to this message and can also be found at [1].
+1.
It seems to be primarily focussed on content delivery, not so much
interactivity, right? As such it would handle a sub set of what most
other web frameworks