RE: Some advice needed on JSPWiki package names

Janne, You and I had the same thought. I suggest going with org.apache.JSPWiki, as suggested by you in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-465?focusedCommentId=12660676# action_12660676. --- Noel - To

[PROPOSAL] Pivot

Hello all, The Pivot team would like to present the Pivot toolkit for consideration to the Apache Incubator. We are excited about the prospect of joining the Incubator and are looking forward to your feedback. Thanks, Greg Brown Abstract Pivot (http://pivot-toolkit.org) is an

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-103) [IP-GRANT] PyLucene

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12660878#action_12660878 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on INCUBATOR-103: --- OK, great. Then I think we are

Re: Some advice needed on JSPWiki package names

Hi Janne, one of my favorite quotes - The problem with quick and dirty is that dirty remains long after quick has been forgotten +) when do you expect a JSPWiki 3.0 release to hit the public - I think it will be a while ... +) even when JSPWiki 3.0 is available only a few people will use it in

Re: Some advice needed on JSPWiki package names

Hi all, Noel J. Bergman schrieb: Janne, You and I had the same thought. I suggest going with org.apache.JSPWiki, as suggested by you in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-465?focusedCommentId=12660676# action_12660676. I would not go that route, actually I agree with Harry

Re: Some advice needed on JSPWiki package names

Hi, On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Janne Jalkanen janne.jalka...@ecyrd.com wrote: We've got some fairly hackish ways around this (which cause pain), so the question to Incubator folks is - can we use a different package name than org.apache.jspwiki for our project, or does it require a full

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pivot

As expected, I think this project is really interesting and have a potential of succeeding, not because it is a standard, but because it is not... It is not killed by a committee and doesn't need to take into considerations from Sun, IBM and other power players, who are cautiously guarding their

[IP-CLEARANCE] PyLucene

Please (lazily) vote to accept the PyLucene software grant: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/pylucene.xml See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-103 Cheers, Grant Ingersoll