Re: Gsoc Applicant

2009-03-31 Thread kusum kumar
The image viewer i was talking about is up but the picture aren't visible due to the hosting problems . The link is http://geocities.com/kussumkumar/viewer/. Feedback shall be highly appreciated .I will modify the proposal and submit again by tonight . Please just go through it.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project. We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there are no major problems. All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
I've just noticed that the download links for 0.1 are already in place at http://incubator.apache.org/olio/downloads.html and seem to be working. I thought the release vote had to succeed before publishing anything? See:

RE: If you're not interested in Java and MySQL Cluster, you can stop reading now...

2009-03-31 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Craig Russell wrote: the MySQL Cluster code is currently licensed strictly as GPL/ Commercial. I'm working with the MySQL product folks on changing the license to be similar to the other MySQL connectors (waiving the GPL terms when used with approved open source licenses). You should work

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread Shanti Subramanyam
sebb wrote: On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project. We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there are no major problems. All package names have been changed to

[VOTE] Approve the release of JempBox 0.8.0-incubating

2009-03-31 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, The PDFBox PPMC has voted to release version 0.8.0-incubating of the JempBox library included in PDFBox. The release candidate is available for review at http://people.apache.org/~jukka/pdfbox/jempbox-0.8.0-incubating/ See the original vote messages below for more details. Niall posted a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread Shanti Subramanyam
Sorry about that. This was because of my lack of understanding of the process. I have removed the link now and will re-distribute artifacts after approval. Shanti sebb wrote: I've just noticed that the download links for 0.1 are already in place at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Sebb, Thanks for taking a look. The artifacts were uploaded prematurely and will be taken down. A couple of comments below as well... On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:22 AM, sebb wrote: On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: This is the first binary release of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote: Hi Sebb, Thanks for taking a look. The artifacts were uploaded prematurely and will be taken down. A couple of comments below as well... On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:22 AM, sebb wrote: On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project. We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of JempBox 0.8.0-incubating

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The PDFBox PPMC has voted to release version 0.8.0-incubating of the JempBox library included in PDFBox. The release candidate is available for review at http://people.apache.org/~jukka/pdfbox/jempbox-0.8.0-incubating/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread Craig L Russell
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote: On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project. We have fixed many bugs and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote: On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project. We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of JempBox 0.8.0-incubating

2009-03-31 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/03/2009, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:  See the original vote messages below for more details. Niall posted a  RAT report at http://people.apache.org/~niallp/rat-jempbox-0.8.0.txt There are a few (small)

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of JempBox 0.8.0-incubating

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/03/2009, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: See the original vote messages below for more details. Niall posted a RAT report at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project. We

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread Shanti Subramanyam
Craig L Russell wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote: All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have updated many source license/header files and added the LICENSE, NOTICE files. However, the RAT report shows that there are lots of files without the correct

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote: All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread Craig L Russell
On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote: All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have updated many source license/header files and added the LICENSE, NOTICE files. However, the RAT report

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote: All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have updated

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread Craig L Russell
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sebb wrote: I'm not convinced that the license permits Ruby code to be added to SVN. Here is the a reference I found to the use of works under the Ruby license: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html This does not allows projects to include

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread sebb
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sebb wrote: I'm not convinced that the license permits Ruby code to be added to SVN. Here is the a reference I found to the use of works under the Ruby license:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

2009-03-31 Thread Shanti Subramanyam
Since we have two packages with different LICENSE and NOTICE files, is it okay to name them as follows : . LICENSE_php.txt, NOTICE_php.txt . LICENSE_rails.txt, NOTICE_rails.txt Shanti Craig L Russell wrote: On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sebb wrote: I'm not convinced that the license

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of JempBox 0.8.0-incubating

2009-03-31 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: [x] +1 Approve the release of JempBox 0.8.0-incubating [ ] -1 Do not approve this release because... Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here;

New Incubator Proposal: Null - A cloud-aware Web 3.0 Container

2009-03-31 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, together with Bertrand Delacretaz, Carsten Ziegeler, and Jukka Zitting, I came up with a proposal to bring our cloud-aware Web 3.0 Container to Apache. You'll find all the details here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NullProposal Now, currently we are looking for interested parties.

RE: New Incubator Proposal: Null - A cloud-aware Web 3.0 Container

2009-03-31 Thread Gavin
-Original Message- From: Felix Meschberger [mailto:fmesc...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Felix Meschberger Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 3:23 PM To: Incubator General Subject: New Incubator Proposal: Null - A cloud-aware Web 3.0 Container Hi, together with Bertrand Delacretaz,

RE: New Incubator Proposal: Null - A cloud-aware Web 3.0 Container

2009-03-31 Thread Gavin
-Original Message- From: Gavin [mailto:ga...@16degrees.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2009 3:33 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: New Incubator Proposal: Null - A cloud-aware Web 3.0 Container -Original Message- From: Felix Meschberger