What about commons javaflow - you're releasing a binary jar for that
(its not been released by apache commons) and no source code from what
I can see:
http://incubator.markmail.org/message/wko4emwcwst5imto
If you're going to release that code then you should include the
source and IMO it would
+1 on what Niall said
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Niall
Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
What about commons javaflow - you're releasing a binary jar for that
(its not been released by apache commons) and no source code from what
I can see:
On 03/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.4.0-rc1. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent,
Cross-pollination and help from the Felix community have been talked
about several times and I absolutely welcome that. As such, please
would Felix committers willing to spend time helping the (proposed)
Aries podling add their names to the initial committer list on the
proposal wiki [1]. This
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 13:20 +0100, sebb wrote:
The reason for putting third-party licenses in lib/licenses was to
ease
maintenance, which in turn should help guarantee that this
information
is up-to-date and accurate. That still seems like a valid reason so
if
possible, I'd like to
Hi,
Richard S. Hall schrieb:
We need the software grant on file for this, did I miss it?
The grant has been recorded and I have updated the IP-Clearance page [2]
Regards
Felix
- richard
On 9/4/09 7:25, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Felix project has received a contribution
On 9/7/09 17:41, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Richard S. Hall schrieb:
We need the software grant on file for this, did I miss it?
The grant has been recorded and I have updated the IP-Clearance page [2]
Great, I see it has been recorded. So, I guess the 72 hour IP clearance
