2009/9/1 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org:
...
+1 for Incubation, btw. I might sign up as Mentor, if I can squeeze in the
time...
Can I persuade you to sign up :-) ... we have two experienced ASF
members as mentors, but I think the additional perspective outside the
two companies putting the
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
...
Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing?
If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in the binary
release.
Even if it is
On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
...
Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for testing?
If so, then it should not be the in
Hi Marcel, I agree it was an oversight. I added the following to the
Relationship with Other Apache Projects section:
Apache Ace - http://incubator.apache.org/ace Apache ACE is a software
distribution framework that allows you to centrally manage and
distribute software components, configuration
Hello Jeremy,
Thanks! I'm still considering if it makes sense to add my name to the
list of initial committers to help out with this, but I will
definitely be following what's going on at Aries.
Greetings, Marcel
On Sep 9, 2009, at 13:09 , Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Hi Marcel, I agree it was
Thank you very much everyone on the previous thread for the help with the
intricacies of what goes in NOTICE and LICENSE. I think we've got the files
to a good point, but before we tag the 1.3-rc3 candidate, I'd like a sanity
check from those that know better than I :) If you can spare a moment,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going
to be hard to get this
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Todd Volkerttvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much everyone on the previous thread for the help with the
intricacies of what goes in NOTICE and LICENSE. I think we've got the files
to a good point, but before we tag the 1.3-rc3 candidate, I'd like a
On 09/09/2009, Todd Volkert tvolk...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much everyone on the previous thread for the help with the
intricacies of what goes in NOTICE and LICENSE. I think we've got the files
to a good point, but before we tag the 1.3-rc3 candidate, I'd like a sanity
check from
(dropped cassandra-dev)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with
putting an acknowledgment in the NOTICE file. (putting terms in the
LICENSE file
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Leo Simonsm...@leosimons.com wrote:
(dropped cassandra-dev)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Even if it is not in the release I believe there is nothing wrong with
putting an
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:44 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2009, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:28 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for
testing?
If so, then it should not be the in
2009/9/2 Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Jeremy Hugheshugh...@apache.org wrote:
We appreciate any feedback and comments on the proposal.
...
* Projects that consist of groups of components often have some
problems maintaining sufficient cohesion as a community.
Since there have been several edits, can you repost the latest proposal?
Also, I'm looking forward to contribute and to help integrate any
changes needed to support OpenJPA for RFC 143.
Thanks,
Donald
Jeremy Hughes wrote:
2009/9/2 Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 22:28 +0100, sebb wrote:
Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for
testing? If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in
the binary release.
We have a source and binary distribution with the same NOTICE and
LICENSE texts in both
On 09/09/2009, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 22:28 +0100, sebb wrote:
Does the release actually *include* JUnit, or is that only used for
testing? If so, then it should not be the in the NOTICE file, nor in
the binary release.
We have a source and binary
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 17:23 +0100, sebb wrote:
We have a source and binary distribution with the same NOTICE and
LICENSE texts in both artifacts. While we don't want/need to ship
the
junit jar in the binary distribution (see CASSANDRA-417), shipping
it in
the source artifact is
Hi Gurkan,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogducgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
...As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans podling , it
takes too much days to release internal milestones of the project
What's preventing OpenWebBeans from graduating?
That's
Hi Leo,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Leo Simonsm...@leosimons.com wrote:
... http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/guides/releasemanagement.xml?r1=805581r2=805940
...
...The important new (to me) bit is Nothing else belongs in the NOTICE
document. Someone want
Hi Bertrand;
What's preventing OpenWebBeans from graduating?
That's the best way of streamlining your release process.
Actually this is ongoing discussion in the openwebbeans dev list. There are two
solutions here, sub-project under Geronimo or TLP. But community are voted on
being a TLP. The
All:
FYI, a new vote is beginning today on the RC3 candidate:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pivot-...@incubator.apache.org/msg03076.html.
This release candidate addresses issues that Sebb discovered with the RC2
candidate.
Thanks,
-T
On Sep 9, 2009, at 3:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Gurkan,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogducgurkanerdo...@gmail.com
wrote:
...As an experienced podling releaser guy from the OpenWebBeans
podling , it
takes too much days to release internal milestones of the
hey Gurkan,
don't worry that much about the user-base. It will grow.
You guys are implementing a pretty new JSR. Once that is used more and
more in the industry,
the users will come to your project.
-Matthias
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Gurkan Erdogdugurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi
Hi Jeremy,
We from SAP would like to join and nominate six people for the
proposed Aries project. What's the process - should I just add the six
names on the wiki ? Maybe we could discuss this offline to not spam
the whole mailing list.
Unfortunately none of the suggested people from our side
Hi Peter,
Excellent! I am hoping that the champions - in this case Kevan Miller and
Guillaume Nodet - will chime in on next steps.
thanks,
dims
On 09/09/2009 01:45 PM, Peter Peshev wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
We from SAP would like to join and nominate six people for the
proposed Aries project.
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Hi Peter,
Excellent! I am hoping that the champions - in this case Kevan
Miller and Guillaume Nodet - will chime in on next steps.
Cool! So, IMO would be best to post the names here on general@ and let
Jeremy update the Wiki. That
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote:
hey Gurkan,
don't worry that much about the user-base. It will grow
Agree about that, an active users list it not a requirement for graduation.
Kevan mentions community diversity as something to improve
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Kevan Millerkevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool! So, IMO would be best to post the names here on general@ and let
Jeremy update the Wiki.
Since we're at it, I'd like to sign up as a committer as well (apache
username ngn). Will be quite time constrained in the
28 matches
Mail list logo
