On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
On 10/28/2009 08:58 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
+1, but I would like to see a more imaginative name ;-)
Nephelococcygia ? ;-)
Not that it matters, but +1 from me too, this sounds really useful.
-- leif
-
To unsubscribe,
On 10/28/2009 07:39 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LibcloudProposal
Please cast your
-Original Message-
From: Paul Querna [mailto:p...@querna.org]
Sent: Thursday, 29 October 2009 4:40 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Libcloud proposal for incubation
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start
+1 (non-binding)
Looking forward to using such a unified API from within ACE.
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hello Martin,
I may fail to understand Paul's question, indeed. Let me give my best
try to answer to your questions.
Is it not true that OpenMeetings requires Red5 in order to function
properly?
True.
The Openmeetings requires Red5 to function properly.
So that, if we cannot distribute Red5 as
Hello Niclas,
Thanks for a link [1]! It reads:
The LGPL is ineligible primarily due to the restrictions it places on larger
works
Well, I believe if lawyers said that, they have enough attribution.
Though I always thought that LGPL is GPL limited to the library scope.
How does LGPL place
[X] +1 Accept Libcloud for incubation (binding)
On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
On Wed 28 Oct 2009 14:39, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LibcloudProposal
+1
--kevan
On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LibcloudProposal
On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Reliance on Salaried Developers
The majority, but not all, of the developers are paid by their
employer to work on libcloud at this time.
I assume these are cloudkick employees? Will diversity be an issue for
graduation? Since no
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Reliance on Salaried Developers
The majority, but not all, of the developers are paid by their
employer to work on libcloud at this time.
I assume these are
2009/10/29 Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com:
How does LGPL place restrictions on larger works?
The main issue is section 6 in LGPL, namely we would have to ensure
that downstream users are allowed to reverse engineer the derived
works. So what does that really mean?
LGPL defines linking
2009/10/29 Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com:
1. Anyone can distribute GPL-licensed binary, or LGPL-licensed
library. The virus problems begin when you try to modify the source of
the product. This always requires proper attributions in COPYRIGHT
file, but anyway.
Correct (to a point),
14 matches
Mail list logo
