On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
Apache/Maven release process as documented at
On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
Apache/Maven release process as documented at
Hi,
The Apache Aries community is pleased to announce the Apache Aries
0.1-incubating release. This is the first release of Apache Aries.
The Aries project delivers a set of pluggable Java components enabling
an enterprise OSGi application programming model. This includes
implementations and
On May 26, 2010, at 2:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
Apache/Maven release process as
On May 26, 2010, at 3:31 AM, sebb wrote:
On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the standard
Apache/Maven release process as documented at
On 26/05/2010, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On May 26, 2010, at 3:31 AM, sebb wrote:
On 25/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The release is made following the
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On May 26, 2010, at 2:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Shiro, version
1.0.0-incubating. The
While I haven't looked at what Shiro has done, your
explanation of the relevance of a buildable source
package sounds fine.
- Original Message
From: ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wed, May 26, 2010 11:11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Shiro
On 26/05/2010, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On May 26, 2010, at 2:00 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The staging site appeared to be part of the vote as it was not
specifically excluded.
This was a mistake - it probably should have been excluded. AFAICT,
staging sites are _not_ considered release artifacts because they're
never
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but thats
not enough as an ASF release must include a source release. If I've
just missed it
On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The staging site appeared to be part of the vote as it was not
specifically excluded.
This was a mistake - it probably should have been excluded. AFAICT,
staging
On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood l...@hazlewood.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but thats
not enough as an ASF
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit confusing to have two copies of the NL files in the root
of the archive:
LICENSE and LICENSE.txt have the same content.
NOTICE and NOTICE.txt have significantly different content.
LICENSE and NOTICE are not in SVN as
On May 26, 2010, at 10:14 AM, sebb wrote:
On 26/05/2010, Les Hazlewood l...@hazlewood.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way
to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the
On May 26, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but
thats
not enough as an ASF release
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Les Hazlewood l...@hazlewood.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:11 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't find all the source for the release. AFAICT the only way to
recreate all the release artifacts would be from the svn tag but thats
not enough
Thanks Ant!
And we'll be updating the website today to have all the valid
disclaimers and links back to the Incubator website.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:02 AM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Les Hazlewood l...@hazlewood.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at
On 26/05/2010, Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a bit confusing to have two copies of the NL files in the root
of the archive:
LICENSE and LICENSE.txt have the same content.
NOTICE and NOTICE.txt have
This looks correct to me. The way it's setup with the apache parent
pom is that the root module will have the fully buildable source, all
the individual modules still have their source and jdocs for ide
integration.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Les Hazlewood l...@hazlewood.com wrote:
On
20 matches
Mail list logo
