Hi Gav,
You've done a heck of a lot more than sort out license headers! In particular
when we first entered the incubator there were so many things you did to help
us get our act together.
So thanks for all your help and input as a Wookie mentor, I really appreciate
all that you've done for
Looks good to me too, i can't see anything at all to comment on.
+1
...ant
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Signature/checksums, build, source (RAT), and general snooping around with
emacs all looked good. Thanks Donald!
--kevan
On Aug
Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advice about a legal
situation that I'm not 100% sure about, I'm pretty sure it's a simple
case so I'm asking the IPMC rather than legal-discuss@
In short:
- there is a few files that are part of an existing FOAF+SSL
certification project
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
add it to NOTICES.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advice about a legal
situation that I'm not 100% sure about, I'm pretty sure it's a
BSD license as in with advertising clause or as in new BSD license
without advertising clause? IANAL, but my impression is that the reply
depends on that.
Jochen
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advice
The vote passes with the following four binding +1 IPMC votes :
Donald Woods, Kevan Miller, Ant Elder, Mark Struberg
and the following four non-binding PPMC +1 votes:
Carlos Vara, Simone Tripodi, Gerhard Petracek, Jeremy Bauer
There were no 0 or -1 votes.
Thanks,
Donald
On 8/13/10 1:38
On 08/17/2010 07:48 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17/08/2010 17:35, Carl Trieloff wrote:
To this question, (what will make this model succeed or fail) I find
myself not coming
to defensible answers... I would love to see thoughts of others on this
question.
The thread implies it comes down to
I'm sure I read the rules for this on some ASF web page only a week or
so ago ...
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 18/08/2010 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
add it to NOTICES.
[ X ] +1 - Recommend graduation of Apache Shiro as a TLP
Congrats to everyone. (the remaining issues that are being improperly
discussed on this VOTE thread are minor and not a blocker, IMO)
Dan
On Monday 16 August 2010 2:18:22 pm Kalle Korhonen wrote:
The Apache Shiro community and the
On 18/08/2010 14:25, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 08/17/2010 07:48 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17/08/2010 17:35, Carl Trieloff wrote:
To this question, (what will make this model succeed or fail) I find
myself not coming
to defensible answers... I would love to see thoughts of others on this
Hi,
On 18/08/2010 14:23, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 18/08/2010 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
add it to NOTICES.
Sure, but what about the licence headers?
I think I've seen this done in a few projects (I think one of them
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Bruno Harbulot
bruno.harbu...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
On 18/08/2010 14:23, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 18/08/2010 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you
Do you think this requires a formal IPMC vote or can we just do it?
Thankfully, I think most of our mailing lists, etc. are already generic, so
we shouldn't really need to change much in terms of branding other than the
primary website.
On Aug 16, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
+1 Yay!
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 16, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
The Apache Shiro community and the mentors of the project think the
project is ready to graduate and is asking for IPMC's recommendation
to present the project resolution to the board. The community
graduation vote
On 18 Aug 2010, at 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
add it to NOTICES.
Indeed. We have precedent on bundling of third-party code,
such as expat and pcre.
--
Nick Kew
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed both issues Sebb raised. I doubt either was an impediment to
graduation, but keep 'em coming. Oh and the votes too! (I fear our
little vote will get lost in experiment/radical chat).
I just published the
Thanks so much Niall for both the vote and the svn commit!
Les
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
Fixed both issues Sebb raised. I doubt either was an impediment to
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
When I saw this month's board report for Subversion, I was taken aback
that the board is expected to follow the terminology used by only one
project. Really? The board, which has used the same terms for 10++
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:02, Sanjiva Weerawarana
sanj...@opensource.lk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf
d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
When I saw this month's board report for Subversion, I was taken aback
that the board is expected to follow the terminology used by
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 18:02, Sanjiva Weerawarana
sanj...@opensource.lk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf
d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
When I saw this month's board report for Subversion, I was taken
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/18/10 23:11, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
I know I've been quite here, but I've been
+1
Niall
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Message
From: Joe
To further expand on this comment:
The Board said that PMCs can make their own rules on how committership
is granted. The Board has no opinion on what the Incubator wants to do
with this topic because that choice is and has always been delegated
to the PMC. This is a consensus opinion of the
+1
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 13:44, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have come to the realization that I'm not
going to convince Noel to see things my way
any time soon, so I'd like to now ask for a
formal majority consensus vote on relaxed rules
for the 3 aforementioned projects.
Hi Joe,
+1 from me. Thanks for sticking with this.
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/18/10 4:11 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
+1, happy experimenting!
--tim
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Actually, speaking of which too, Noel, since I'm on the Incubator PMC, please
add me as a mentor for SIS now too. I'll add myself as a mentor to the SIS
proposal on the wiki as well, but can someone please add me to the other
appropriate areas (or tell me how
Hi David,
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/18/10 5:50 PM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Actually, speaking of which too, Noel, since I'm on the Incubator PMC, please
add me as a mentor for SIS now too. I'll add myself as a mentor to the SIS
proposal
+1
Dan
On Wednesday 18 August 2010 7:11:39 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer
Greg Stein wrote:
The Board said that PMCs can make their own rules on how committership
is granted. The Board has no opinion on what the Incubator wants to do
with this topic because that choice is and has always been delegated
to the PMC. This is a consensus opinion of the Board, as no
Ross Gardler wrote:
For me success or failure comes down to the quality of the mentoring and
the willingness of the project committers to learn how to apply the
Apache Way to their community.
+1
--- Noel
-
To
On 2010-08-19, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to
remove the
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi Everyone,
First off I would like to thank everyone for voting on NPanday to be in the
incubator.
We already have our mailing lists setup @
* for NPanday usage questions; npanday-us...@incubator.apache.org
(subscribe by posting to npanday-users-subscr...@incubator.apache.org)
* for
36 matches
Mail list logo
