On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Stefan Seelmann seelm...@apache.org wrote:
+1
RAT report looks good.
Source distribution exists.
Binary distributions and WAR contain licenses and notices of included
libraries.
Some notes, maybe you can fix that in the next release: the war file
+1 to releasing most of this. I do think the duplicate and incorrect
legal files should be cleaned up as Stefan commented, and because of
those the webapp modules in the maven repo look like they have ended
up with the wrong license/notice files. I also think it would be
better to change from
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:41 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to releasing most of this. I do think the duplicate and incorrect
legal files should be cleaned up as Stefan commented, and because of
those the webapp modules in the maven repo look like they have ended
up with the
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's third milestone
release (PhotArk M3-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval
to publish the release. This release candidate has minimal changes compared
to
