Phil Steitz wrote on Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 22:32:24 -0500:
On 2/5/11 4:16 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Bertrand,
I agree. The good thing about a vibrant community is that they
generally enforce this. All I'm saying is this shouldn't be a must
requirement, rather it should be a shall and we
Hi All
The Chemistry podling has been in the incubator since early 2009. In the
last 6 months, the podling has had two sucessful Java releases, and now
its first sucessful non-Java release too. The community is healthy and
diverse, has added new committers, and brought in other code bases +
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote:
...Following advice from the mentors, the Chemistry podling has now voted to
graduate:...
I'd therefore like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation
+1
Special kudos for the chemistry and opencmis teams for
Yes, I agree with that. In the example I used, things like master
poms which are infrastructure, or a minor site updates, or fixing
'moved' repositories which wouldn't let things build. Those were our
only real exceptions.
Most changes we give the 72 hours for because if it's deserving of a
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Alan D. Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
It's my understanding that all voting takes place during a 72 hour period.
If that period ends on a weekend then it's customary to wait until Monday to
complete.
I don't see this documented on
+1 from me. (binding)
Congrats guys!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 11, 2011, at 3:53 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
Hi All
The Chemistry podling has been in the incubator since early 2009. In the
last 6 months, the podling has had two sucessful Java releases, and now
its first sucessful non-Java release
Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How
would I proceed?
Well, I *won't* proceed by asking for an ASF lab. Why? Because an ASF
lab precludes me from collaboration with anyone except ASF committers,
and that's a completely arbitrary distinction.
So, these days, my
On 2/11/11 5:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How
would I proceed?
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/ ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On 2011-02-11, Nick Burch wrote:
I'd therefore like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation.
+1 - I approve of the Chemistry graduation
0 - I've not had time to look into it, sorry
-1 - There's an issue with graduation at this time, which is
+1
Stefan
Those have zero oversight, and are supposed to be associated with
existing projects, no?
More seriously,
There are a number of things Apache Extras projects can not do since
they are not official Apache Software Foundation projects, including
1) include the word Apache in their name, 2) use the
As an Apache outsider who has some role in guiding our overall company
use of open-source software, the high-barrier to entry is *precisely*
what makes Apache currently so valuable to us, as a client.
Not sure you want to dilute that.
-Eric.
On 2/11/11 8:44 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Those
Eric,
I don't feel that your reply is fair. I am not 'lowering the bar' to
the eventual creation of a TLP that makes official Apache releases. I
am proposing, if you will excuse the metaphor, to create a less steep
ramp that approaches that bar. Right now, we say 'go away until you
have a
Le 11 févr. 2011 à 17:13, Benson Margulies a écrit :
Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How
would I proceed?
Well, I *won't* proceed by asking for an ASF lab. Why? Because an ASF
lab precludes me from collaboration with anyone except ASF committers,
and
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I *won't* proceed by asking for an ASF lab. Why? Because an ASF
lab precludes me from collaboration with anyone except ASF committers,
and that's a completely arbitrary distinction.
As a Labs PMC member
hat's a completely arbitrary distinction.
As a Labs PMC member at least I would be open to a proposal to change
that rule, if that's the only thing preventing Labs from being used
for something like this.
In the interests of email economy:
A scheme to do this at the Lab would be fine with
+1
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-02-11, Nick Burch wrote:
I'd therefore like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation.
+1 - I approve of the Chemistry graduation
0 - I've not had time to look into it, sorry
-1 - There's an issue with
+1
Although the initial committers list are all paied by Yahoo, but I
trust that the project will attract a lot of other developers more
specifically from Hadoop family of projects.
Only one note: Do you really need a separate users@ list, I didn't
find in your proposal any pointers to a
17 matches
Mail list logo
