On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:46 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Eric Sammer esam...@cloudera.com wrote:
== Rationale ==
MRUnit has existed as a contrib component of Apache Hadoop. This has served
to introduce users to the library and to provide
Hi Guys,
I don't know, none of those things really sound like justification for
a separate TLP, keeping something like this nearby to Hadoop MapReduce
seems like it would help give it a better chance of long term survival
to me. Wouldn't simply moving mrunit out from
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Guys,
I don't know, none of those things really sound like justification for
a separate TLP, keeping something like this nearby to Hadoop MapReduce
seems like it would help give it a better
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
The Hadoop community has been VOTE'ing over the past month to abandon
development of portions of their code base...
...A few of us members (myself, Patrick and Nige) were willing to step
Hi Ant,
On Feb 28, 2011, at 7:18 AM, ant elder wrote:
You're right about the entry criteria, there's a very low bar to
becoming an Incubator poddling so if you all really want to I'm pretty
sure you'll be able to make it happen. But this is a proposal
discussion thread which asks for
Hey Bertrand,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
My point was that the technical reasons listed in this thread don't
seem to warrant forking MRUnit into its own project,
Meh, arguably they do. One of the big issues is release
With 9 binding +1 votes and no -1s, the vote passes. I'll take the
naming issue back to the Howl contributors to discuss what we want to
do about it.
What's the next step now?
Alan.
On Feb 22, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
I would like to call a vote on accepting Howl as an
On 25/02/11 01:08, Ate Douma wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good shape so
I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal
The vote passes with a total of 29 +1
